Skip to main content

Triggering Transitions Towards Sustainable Development of the Dutch Agricultural Sector: Trans Forum's Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Agriculture

Abstract

TransForum is an innovation program which aims to make a substantial contribution to the transition towards more sustainable development of the Dutch agricultural sector. This article describes the scientific foundation and architecture of this program. TransForum operates on the basis of five working hypotheses which together constitute one integrated analytical framework. These hypotheses are: (1) sustainable development is a dynamic system property; (2) sustainable development needs system innovation; (3) system innovation is a non-linear learning process; (4) system innovation requires active participation of relevant key players from knowledge institutes, governmental bodies, civil society organisations and the business community; (5) the program requires transdisciplinary collaboration of all players. TransForum identifies three new innovation strategies: (1) vital clusters; (2) regional development; (3) international agro-food networks; as alternatives to the current arrangements. Innovative projects are organised in these innovation strategies. The aim of the scientific program is threefold: (1) it addresses research questions raised in the innovative projects; (2) it investigates the need for system-innovations and the way in which they can be realized; (3) it designs research projects to test the five main working hypotheses of the program. The scientific program is organised in four themes following a cyclic innovation process which is constantly monitored. The cycle starts with people’s preferences and images, followed by studies on which inventions are required to achieve a successful innovation. Subsequently, it is investigated how to organize new innovations and transitions and finally, how citizen/consumers behaviour and preferences mobilizes sustainable development, closing the loop.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Argyris C. (1994) Initiating change that perseveres, J. Public Administration Res. Theory: J-PART 4, 343–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C. (1999) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison Wesley, Boston, MA, 560 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderies J.M., Janssen M.A., Ostrom E. (2004) A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective, Ecol. Soc. 9, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F., Colding J., Folke C. (Eds.) (2003) Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouma J. ( 2005) Agenda for future research, in: Koeman J.H., Schiereck J.D. (Eds.), Responsibilities of Environmental Research, KNAW, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cafiero C., Capitanio F., Cioffi A., Coppola A. (2007) Risk and crisis management in the reformed European agricultural policy, Can. J. Agr. Econ. 55, 419–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S., Walker B., Anderies J.M., Abel N. (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4, 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells M. (1996) The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. I: The Rise of the Network Society, Blackwell, Malden, MA, 556 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M. (1997) The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. II: The Power of Identity, 461 p., Vol. III: End of Millennium, 418 p., Blackwell, Malden, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijk G., van, Mackel C. (1991) Dutch agriculture seeking for market leader strategies, Eur. Rev. Agr. Econ. 18, 345–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driel H. van, Schot J. (2005) Radical innovation as a multi-level process, Technol. Cult. 46, 51–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn E.C. (2003) Trojan pig: paradoxes of food safety regulation, Environ. Planning A 35, 1493–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J. (1998) Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, New Society, Stony Creek, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiksel J. (2006) Sustainability and resilience: towards a systems approach, Sustain. Sci. Practice Policy 2, 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller K.E., Leeuwis C., Anderson J.A., Andriesse W., Brouwer A., Frost P., Hebinck P., Heitkönig I., Ittersum M.K., Koning N., Ruben R., Slingerland M., Udo H., Veldkamp A., van de Vijver C., van Wijk, M.T., Windmeijer P. (2008) Competing claims of natural resources: what is the role of Science, Ecol. Soc. 13(2), 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence R.J., Després C. (2004) Futures of transdisciplinarity, Futures 36, 397–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J., Dietz T., Carpenter S.R., Alberti M., Folke C., Moran E., Pell A.N., Deadman P., Kratz T., Lubchenco J., Ostrom E., Ouyang Z., Provencher W., Redman C.L., Schneider S.H., Taylor W.W. (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems, Science 14, 1513–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebel L., Anderies J.M., Campbell B., Folke C., Hatfield-Dodds S., Hughes T.P., Wilson J. (2006) Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems, Ecol. Soc. 11, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwis C. (2000) Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: towards a negotiation approach, Dev. Change 31, 931–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maris A., de Veer J. (1973) Dutch agriculture in the period 1950–1970 and a look ahead, Eur. Rev. Agr. Econ. 1, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens P. (2006) Sustainability: science or fiction? Sustain. Sci. Practice Policy 2. Available online: http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol2iss1/communityessay.martens.pdf

  • Newman L. (2005) Uncertainty, innovation, and dynamic sustainable development, Sustain. Sci. Practice Policy 1. Available online: http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol1iss2/0501--001.newman.pdf

  • Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M. (2003) Introduction: ‘mode 2’ revisited: the new production of knowledge, Minerva 3, 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroli B., van Doorn A., de Blust G., Parachini M.L., Wascher D., Bunce F. (Eds.) (2007) Europe’s living landscapes. Essays exploring our identity in the countryside. LANDSCAPE EUROPE / KNNV, Wageningen / Zeist, The Netherlands, 432 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl C., Hirsch Hadorn G. (2007) Principles for Designing Transdisciplinary Research – Proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences, Oekom, Munich, 120 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension, Doubleday, Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M.E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Harvard Business Review 90211, 857 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M.E. (2000) Location, competition, and economic development: local clusters is global economy, Eco. Dev. Q. 14, 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M.E. (2003) The economic performance of regions, Reg. Stud. 37, 549–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans J. (2003) Transitiemanagement: sleutel naar een duurzame samenleving, van Gorcum Uitgeverij, Assen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker G., Mossberger K. (1994) Urban regime theory in comparative perspective, in: Environment and Planning, C, Government and Policy, 12, 195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson G.R. (2002) Foot and mouth disease: facing the new dilemmas, Sci. Techn. Rev. 21, 498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P.H., Rounsevell M.D.A., Veldkamp A. (2006a) Scenario based studies of future land use in Europe, (Editorial), Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 114, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P.H., Schulp C.J.E., Witte N., Veldkamp A. (2006b) Downscaling of land use scenarios to assess the dynamics of European landscapes, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 114, 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiskerke J.S.C., Van der Ploeg J.D. (Eds.) (2004) Seeds of transition: essays on novelty production, niches and regimes in agriculture, Van Gorcum, Assen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article has benefited form the useful and constructive remarks made by two anonymous reviewers and a field editor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Veldkamp .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Veldkamp, A. et al. (2009). Triggering Transitions Towards Sustainable Development of the Dutch Agricultural Sector: Trans Forum's Approach. In: Lichtfouse, E., Navarrete, M., Debaeke, P., Véronique, S., Alberola, C. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics