Abstract
TransForum is an innovation program which aims to make a substantial contribution to the transition towards more sustainable development of the Dutch agricultural sector. This article describes the scientific foundation and architecture of this program. TransForum operates on the basis of five working hypotheses which together constitute one integrated analytical framework. These hypotheses are: (1) sustainable development is a dynamic system property; (2) sustainable development needs system innovation; (3) system innovation is a non-linear learning process; (4) system innovation requires active participation of relevant key players from knowledge institutes, governmental bodies, civil society organisations and the business community; (5) the program requires transdisciplinary collaboration of all players. TransForum identifies three new innovation strategies: (1) vital clusters; (2) regional development; (3) international agro-food networks; as alternatives to the current arrangements. Innovative projects are organised in these innovation strategies. The aim of the scientific program is threefold: (1) it addresses research questions raised in the innovative projects; (2) it investigates the need for system-innovations and the way in which they can be realized; (3) it designs research projects to test the five main working hypotheses of the program. The scientific program is organised in four themes following a cyclic innovation process which is constantly monitored. The cycle starts with people’s preferences and images, followed by studies on which inventions are required to achieve a successful innovation. Subsequently, it is investigated how to organize new innovations and transitions and finally, how citizen/consumers behaviour and preferences mobilizes sustainable development, closing the loop.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Argyris C. (1994) Initiating change that perseveres, J. Public Administration Res. Theory: J-PART 4, 343–355
Argyris C. (1999) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison Wesley, Boston, MA, 560 p.
Anderies J.M., Janssen M.A., Ostrom E. (2004) A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective, Ecol. Soc. 9, 18.
Berkes F., Colding J., Folke C. (Eds.) (2003) Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Bouma J. ( 2005) Agenda for future research, in: Koeman J.H., Schiereck J.D. (Eds.), Responsibilities of Environmental Research, KNAW, Amsterdam.
Cafiero C., Capitanio F., Cioffi A., Coppola A. (2007) Risk and crisis management in the reformed European agricultural policy, Can. J. Agr. Econ. 55, 419–441.
Carpenter S., Walker B., Anderies J.M., Abel N. (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4, 765–781.
Castells M. (1996) The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. I: The Rise of the Network Society, Blackwell, Malden, MA, 556 p.
Castells M. (1997) The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. II: The Power of Identity, 461 p., Vol. III: End of Millennium, 418 p., Blackwell, Malden, MA.
Dijk G., van, Mackel C. (1991) Dutch agriculture seeking for market leader strategies, Eur. Rev. Agr. Econ. 18, 345–364.
Driel H. van, Schot J. (2005) Radical innovation as a multi-level process, Technol. Cult. 46, 51–76.
Dunn E.C. (2003) Trojan pig: paradoxes of food safety regulation, Environ. Planning A 35, 1493–1511.
Elkington J. (1998) Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, New Society, Stony Creek, CT.
Fiksel J. (2006) Sustainability and resilience: towards a systems approach, Sustain. Sci. Practice Policy 2, 14–21.
Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage, London.
Giller K.E., Leeuwis C., Anderson J.A., Andriesse W., Brouwer A., Frost P., Hebinck P., Heitkönig I., Ittersum M.K., Koning N., Ruben R., Slingerland M., Udo H., Veldkamp A., van de Vijver C., van Wijk, M.T., Windmeijer P. (2008) Competing claims of natural resources: what is the role of Science, Ecol. Soc. 13(2), 34.
Lawrence R.J., Després C. (2004) Futures of transdisciplinarity, Futures 36, 397–405.
Liu J., Dietz T., Carpenter S.R., Alberti M., Folke C., Moran E., Pell A.N., Deadman P., Kratz T., Lubchenco J., Ostrom E., Ouyang Z., Provencher W., Redman C.L., Schneider S.H., Taylor W.W. (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems, Science 14, 1513–1516.
Lebel L., Anderies J.M., Campbell B., Folke C., Hatfield-Dodds S., Hughes T.P., Wilson J. (2006) Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems, Ecol. Soc. 11, 19.
Leeuwis C. (2000) Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: towards a negotiation approach, Dev. Change 31, 931–959.
Maris A., de Veer J. (1973) Dutch agriculture in the period 1950–1970 and a look ahead, Eur. Rev. Agr. Econ. 1, 63–78.
Martens P. (2006) Sustainability: science or fiction? Sustain. Sci. Practice Policy 2. Available online: http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol2iss1/communityessay.martens.pdf
Newman L. (2005) Uncertainty, innovation, and dynamic sustainable development, Sustain. Sci. Practice Policy 1. Available online: http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol1iss2/0501--001.newman.pdf
Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M. (2003) Introduction: ‘mode 2’ revisited: the new production of knowledge, Minerva 3, 179–194.
Pedroli B., van Doorn A., de Blust G., Parachini M.L., Wascher D., Bunce F. (Eds.) (2007) Europe’s living landscapes. Essays exploring our identity in the countryside. LANDSCAPE EUROPE / KNNV, Wageningen / Zeist, The Netherlands, 432 p.
Pohl C., Hirsch Hadorn G. (2007) Principles for Designing Transdisciplinary Research – Proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences, Oekom, Munich, 120 p.
Polanyi M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension, Doubleday, Garden City, NY.
Porter M.E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Harvard Business Review 90211, 857 p.
Porter M.E. (2000) Location, competition, and economic development: local clusters is global economy, Eco. Dev. Q. 14, 15–34.
Porter M.E. (2003) The economic performance of regions, Reg. Stud. 37, 549–578.
Rotmans J. (2003) Transitiemanagement: sleutel naar een duurzame samenleving, van Gorcum Uitgeverij, Assen.
Stoker G., Mossberger K. (1994) Urban regime theory in comparative perspective, in: Environment and Planning, C, Government and Policy, 12, 195–212.
Thomson G.R. (2002) Foot and mouth disease: facing the new dilemmas, Sci. Techn. Rev. 21, 498.
Verburg P.H., Rounsevell M.D.A., Veldkamp A. (2006a) Scenario based studies of future land use in Europe, (Editorial), Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 114, 1–6.
Verburg P.H., Schulp C.J.E., Witte N., Veldkamp A. (2006b) Downscaling of land use scenarios to assess the dynamics of European landscapes, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 114, 39–56.
Wiskerke J.S.C., Van der Ploeg J.D. (Eds.) (2004) Seeds of transition: essays on novelty production, niches and regimes in agriculture, Van Gorcum, Assen.
Acknowledgements
This article has benefited form the useful and constructive remarks made by two anonymous reviewers and a field editor.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Veldkamp, A. et al. (2009). Triggering Transitions Towards Sustainable Development of the Dutch Agricultural Sector: Trans Forum's Approach. In: Lichtfouse, E., Navarrete, M., Debaeke, P., Véronique, S., Alberola, C. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2665-1
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2666-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)