Abstract
Empirical studies of emergent democratic social systems reveal elements which consistently are evoked during the design phase of the new institutions. Considerable scholarly work has been invested in understanding these elements and rationalizing how they collectively represent a precondition for building stable new democratic structures. Less attention has been directed at this time to optimizing this process by considering sequences with which the design elements might be evoked within specific civic contexts. This chapter represents a contribution to our thinking about possibilities for optimizing democratic emergence with enhanced collaborative design methodologies.
The design methodology illustrated is called Structured Dialogic Design in the United States and Structured Democratic Dialogue in Europe. It is a derivative of Interactive Management co-invented by Alexander N. Christakis and John N. Warfield in the 1970s. The method applies the engineering tool of Interpretive Structural Modeling within a soft systems context so that citizens of greatly varied levels of technological capacity can contribute equally in complex systems design. In its various forms, the design method has been used most consistently and extensively in the nation rebuilding efforts of the citizens of Cyprus over the past 20 years. The generic use of this method to design contextually-tuned pathways for democratic emergence has not previously been reported.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & Hart, P. (2008). Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public Administration, 86(1), 225–242.
Christakis, A. N., & Bausch, K. C. (2006). How people harness their collective wisdom and power to construct the future. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Denning, S. (2011). The leader's guide to storytelling: Mastering the art and discipline of business narrative. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; Wiley.
Esri Hosts WWW Conference (2012/2013). Reinventing the art of conversation. ArcNews, 34(2). Accessed from http://www.esri.com/esri-news/arcnews/winter1213articles/esri-hosts-www-conference-reinventing-the-art-of-conversation (Winter).
Flanagan, T. R. (2008). Scripting a collaborative narrative: An approach for spanning boundaries. Design Management Review, 19(3), 80–86.
Flanagan, T. R., & Bausch, K. C. (2012). Body wisdom in dialogue. Riverdale: Ongoing Emergence Press.
Flanagan, T. R., & Christakis, A. N. (2010). The talking point: Creating an environment for exploring complex meaning. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions, and fantasies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Golemon, L. A. (2010). Finding our story: Narrative leadership and congregational change. Herndon: Alban Institute.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
Hardin, G. (1978). Political requirements for preserving our common heritage. In H. P. Bokaw (Ed.), Wildlife and America (pp. 310–317). Washington, D.C.: Council on Environmental Quality.
Hester, R. L., & Walker-Jones, K. (2009). Know your story and lead with it: The power of narrative in clergy leadership. Herdon: The Alban Institute.
Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2006). What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review, 66(6), 111–121.
Lasswell, H. D. (1963). The future of political science. New York: Atherton.
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Estlund, D., Follesdal, A., Fung, A., et al. (2010). The place of self-interest and the role of power in deliberative democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1), 64–100.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1996). Covenants, collective action, and common-pool resources. In K. E. Soltan & S. L. Elkin (Eds.), The constitution of good societies (pp. 23–38). Pennsylvania State University Press: University Park.
Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dogal, N., Stern, P. C., Stanich, S., & Weber, E. U. (2002). The drama of the commons: Committee on the human dimensions of global change. Washington, D.C.: Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, National Academy Press.
Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1971). Public choice: A different approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review, 37, 203–216.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rader, D. (2011). Engaged resistance: American Indian art, literature, and film from Alcatraz to the NMAI. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Robertson, P. J., & Tang, S.-Y. (1995). The role of commitment in collective action: Comparing the organizational behavior and rational choice perspectives. Public Administration Review, 55(1), 67–80.
Romzek, B. S., LeRoux, K., & Blackmar, J. M. (2012). A preliminary theory of informal accountability among network organizational actors. Public Administration Review, 72, 442–453.
Secretary Panetta on Defense Priorities – C-SPAN Video Library. (n.d.). C-SPAN video library. Accessed from http://c-spanvideo.org/program/PanettaonD
Sharp, G. (1993). From dictatorship to democracy: A conceptual framework for liberation. East Boston: The Albert Einstein Institution.
Simmons, A. (2006). The story factor. New York: Basic Books.
Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66, 20–32.
Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1993). The cultures of work organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Wheatley, M. J. (1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world. San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler Publishers.
Wondolleck, J. M., & Yaffee, S. L. (2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, D.C.: Island.
Acknowledgments
The author is grateful for the encouragement and guidance that Dr. Kenneth C. Bausch provided in the effort to honor the contributions of the Ostroms and their colleagues in a concise and readable fashion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Flanagan, T.R. (2014). Designing the Means for Governing the Commons. In: Metcalf, G. (eds) Social Systems and Design. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 1. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54478-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54478-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54477-7
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54478-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)