Abstract
The relationship between the data obtained from provocative tests and angiographically assessed coronary artery disease is usually expressed in terms of sensitivity and specificity, where sensitivity is the frequency of a positive test result in a population of patients with coronary artery disease and specificity is the frequency of a negative test result in a population of patients without disease. In a given population, the values of sensitivity and specificity are affected by a constellation of factors (some of which — more relevant to stress echocardiography — are summarized in Tables 1 and 2) related to the angiographic standard, patient population, stress methodology, and criteria of interpretation. In the presence of more severe and extensive coronary artery disease, any stress echocardiography test will give higher sensitivity values.
No test is so good that you cannot make it look bad; no test is so bad that you cannot make it look good
Marco Antonio Torres [1]
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Torres M (1996) Stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 27:514–515. Letter
Lu C, Picano E, Pingitore A, et al (1995) Complex coronary artery lesion morphology influences results of stress echocardiography. Circulation 91:1669–1675
Heyman J, Salvade P, Picano E, et al (1997) The elusive link between coronary lesion morphology and dobutamine stress echocardiography results. The EDIC (Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative) Study Group. Int J Card Imaging 13:395–401
Gliozheni E, Picano E, Bernardino L, et al (1996) Angiographically assessed coronary collateral circulation increases vulnerability to myocardial ischemia during vasodilator stress testing. Am J Cardiol 78:1419–1424
Beleslin BD, Ostojic M, Djordjevic-Dikic A, et al (1999) Integrated evaluation of relation between coronary lesion features and stress echocardiography results: the importance of coronary lesion morphology. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:717–726
Marwick T, Willemart B, D’Hondt AM, et al (1993) Selection of the optimal nonexercise stress for the evaluation of ischemic regional myocardial dysfunction and malperfusion. Comparison of dobutamine and adenosine using echocardiography and 99mTc-MIBI single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 87:345–354
Severi S, Picano E, Michelassi C, et al (1994) Diagnostic and prognostic value of dipyridamole echocardiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Comparison with exercise electrocardiography. Circulation 89:1160–1173
Marwick T, D’Hondt AM, Baudhuin T, et al (1993) Optimal use of dobutamine stress for the detection and evaluation of coronary artery disease: combination with echocardiography or scintigraphy, or both? J Am Coll Cardiol 22:159–167
Parodi G, Picano E, Marcassa C, et al (1999) High dose dipyridamole stress imaging: simultaneous sestamibi scintigraphy and two-dimensional echocardiography for the detection and evaluation of coronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis 10:177–184
Quinones MA, Verani MS, Haichin RM, et al (1992) Exercise echocardiography versus 201TI single-photon emission computed tomography in evaluation of coronary artery disease. Analysis of 292 patients. Circulation 85:1026–1031
De Albuquerque Fonseca L, Picano E (2001) Comparison of dipyridamole and exercise stress echocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease (a meta-analysis). Am J Cardiol 87:1193–1196
Picano E, Bedetti G, Varga A, et al (2000) The comparable diagnostic accuracies of dobuta-mine-stress and dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies: a meta-analysis. Coron Artery Dis 11:151–159
Imran MB, Palinkas A, Picano E (2002) Head to head comparison of dipyridamole echocardiography and stress perfusion scintigraphy for the detection of coronary artery disease: a metaanalysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 19; 23–28
Pingitore A, Picano E, Colosso MQ, et al (1996) The atropine factor in pharmacologic stress echocardiography. Echo Persantine (EPIC) and Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative (EDIC) Study Groups. J Am Coll Cardiol 27:1164–1170
Pingitore A, Picano E, Varga A, et al (1999) Prognostic value of pharmacological stress echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a prospective, large-scale, multicenter, head-to-head comparison between dipyridamole and dobutamine test. Echo-Persantine International Cooperative (EPIC) and Echo-Dobutamine International Cooperative (EDIC) Study Groups. J Am Coll Cardiol 34:1769–1777
Picano E, Ostojic M, Varga A, et al (1996) Combined low dose dipyridamole-dobutamine stress echocardiography to identify myocardial viability. J Am Coll Cardiol 27:1422–1428
Martin TW, Seaworth JF, Johns JP, et al (1992) Comparison of adenosine, dipyridamole, and dobutamine in stress echocardiography. Ann Intern Med 116:190–196
Beleslin BD, Ostojic M, Stepanovic J, et al (1994) Stress echocardiography in the detection of myocardial ischemia. Head-to-head comparison of exercise, dobutamine, and dipyridamole tests. Circulation 90:1168–1176
Sochowski RA, Yvorchuk KJ, Yang Y, et al (1995) Dobutamine and dipyridamole stress echocardiography in patients with a low incidence of severe coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 8:482–487
San Roman JA, Vilacosta I, Castillo JA, et al (1996) Dipyridamole and dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Comparison with exercise stress test, analysis of agreement, and impact of antianginal treatment. Chest 110:1248–1254
Marwick TH, Nemec JJ, Pashkow FJ, et al (1992) Accuracy and limitations of exercise echocardiography in a routine clinical setting. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:74–81
Lattanzi F, Picano E, Bolognese L, et al (1991) Inhibition of dipyridamole-induced ischemia by antianginal therapy in humans. Correlation with exercise electrocardiography. Circulation 83:1256–1262
Ferrara N, Coltorti F, Leosco D, et al (1995) Protective effect of beta-blockade on dipyridamole-induced myocardial ischaemia. Role of heart rate. Eur Heart J 16:903–908
Ferrara N, Longobardi G, Nicolino A, et al (1992) Effect of beta-adrenoceptor blockade on dipyridamole-induced myocardial asynergies in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 70:724–727
Longobardi G, Ferrara N, Leosco D, et al (1995) Failure of protective effect of Captopril and enalapril on exercise and dipyridamole-induced myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 76:255–258
Fioretti PM, Poldermans D, Salustri A, et al (1994) Atropine increases the accuracy of dobut-amine stress echocardiography in patients taking beta-blockers. Eur Heart J 15:355–360
Dodi C, Pingitore A, Sicari R, et al (1997) Effects of antianginal therapy with a calcium antagonist and nitrates on dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography. Comparison with exercise electrocardiography. Eur Heart J 18:242–247
Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Timothy Bricker J, et al (2002) ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 40:1531–1540
Cheitlin MD, Alpert JS, Armstrong WF, et al (1997) ACC/AHA guidelines for the clinical application of echocardiography: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:862–879
Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (2001) Cardiac Stress Test Supplement. October 2001. http://www.ICI.org (Accessed March 21, 2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Picano, E. (2003). Diagnostic Results and Indications. In: Stress Echocardiography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05096-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05096-5_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-05098-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05096-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive