Skip to main content

Diagnostic Results and Indications

  • Chapter
Stress Echocardiography

Abstract

The relationship between the data obtained from provocative tests and angiographically assessed coronary artery disease is usually expressed in terms of sensitivity and specificity, where sensitivity is the frequency of a positive test result in a population of patients with coronary artery disease and specificity is the frequency of a negative test result in a population of patients without disease. In a given population, the values of sensitivity and specificity are affected by a constellation of factors (some of which — more relevant to stress echocardiography — are summarized in Tables 1 and 2) related to the angiographic standard, patient population, stress methodology, and criteria of interpretation. In the presence of more severe and extensive coronary artery disease, any stress echocardiography test will give higher sensitivity values.

No test is so good that you cannot make it look bad; no test is so bad that you cannot make it look good

Marco Antonio Torres [1]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Torres M (1996) Stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 27:514–515. Letter

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lu C, Picano E, Pingitore A, et al (1995) Complex coronary artery lesion morphology influences results of stress echocardiography. Circulation 91:1669–1675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Heyman J, Salvade P, Picano E, et al (1997) The elusive link between coronary lesion morphology and dobutamine stress echocardiography results. The EDIC (Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative) Study Group. Int J Card Imaging 13:395–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gliozheni E, Picano E, Bernardino L, et al (1996) Angiographically assessed coronary collateral circulation increases vulnerability to myocardial ischemia during vasodilator stress testing. Am J Cardiol 78:1419–1424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beleslin BD, Ostojic M, Djordjevic-Dikic A, et al (1999) Integrated evaluation of relation between coronary lesion features and stress echocardiography results: the importance of coronary lesion morphology. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:717–726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marwick T, Willemart B, D’Hondt AM, et al (1993) Selection of the optimal nonexercise stress for the evaluation of ischemic regional myocardial dysfunction and malperfusion. Comparison of dobutamine and adenosine using echocardiography and 99mTc-MIBI single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 87:345–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Severi S, Picano E, Michelassi C, et al (1994) Diagnostic and prognostic value of dipyridamole echocardiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Comparison with exercise electrocardiography. Circulation 89:1160–1173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Marwick T, D’Hondt AM, Baudhuin T, et al (1993) Optimal use of dobutamine stress for the detection and evaluation of coronary artery disease: combination with echocardiography or scintigraphy, or both? J Am Coll Cardiol 22:159–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Parodi G, Picano E, Marcassa C, et al (1999) High dose dipyridamole stress imaging: simultaneous sestamibi scintigraphy and two-dimensional echocardiography for the detection and evaluation of coronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis 10:177–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Quinones MA, Verani MS, Haichin RM, et al (1992) Exercise echocardiography versus 201TI single-photon emission computed tomography in evaluation of coronary artery disease. Analysis of 292 patients. Circulation 85:1026–1031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. De Albuquerque Fonseca L, Picano E (2001) Comparison of dipyridamole and exercise stress echocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease (a meta-analysis). Am J Cardiol 87:1193–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Picano E, Bedetti G, Varga A, et al (2000) The comparable diagnostic accuracies of dobuta-mine-stress and dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies: a meta-analysis. Coron Artery Dis 11:151–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Imran MB, Palinkas A, Picano E (2002) Head to head comparison of dipyridamole echocardiography and stress perfusion scintigraphy for the detection of coronary artery disease: a metaanalysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 19; 23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pingitore A, Picano E, Colosso MQ, et al (1996) The atropine factor in pharmacologic stress echocardiography. Echo Persantine (EPIC) and Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative (EDIC) Study Groups. J Am Coll Cardiol 27:1164–1170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pingitore A, Picano E, Varga A, et al (1999) Prognostic value of pharmacological stress echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a prospective, large-scale, multicenter, head-to-head comparison between dipyridamole and dobutamine test. Echo-Persantine International Cooperative (EPIC) and Echo-Dobutamine International Cooperative (EDIC) Study Groups. J Am Coll Cardiol 34:1769–1777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Picano E, Ostojic M, Varga A, et al (1996) Combined low dose dipyridamole-dobutamine stress echocardiography to identify myocardial viability. J Am Coll Cardiol 27:1422–1428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin TW, Seaworth JF, Johns JP, et al (1992) Comparison of adenosine, dipyridamole, and dobutamine in stress echocardiography. Ann Intern Med 116:190–196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Beleslin BD, Ostojic M, Stepanovic J, et al (1994) Stress echocardiography in the detection of myocardial ischemia. Head-to-head comparison of exercise, dobutamine, and dipyridamole tests. Circulation 90:1168–1176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sochowski RA, Yvorchuk KJ, Yang Y, et al (1995) Dobutamine and dipyridamole stress echocardiography in patients with a low incidence of severe coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 8:482–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. San Roman JA, Vilacosta I, Castillo JA, et al (1996) Dipyridamole and dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Comparison with exercise stress test, analysis of agreement, and impact of antianginal treatment. Chest 110:1248–1254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Marwick TH, Nemec JJ, Pashkow FJ, et al (1992) Accuracy and limitations of exercise echocardiography in a routine clinical setting. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:74–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lattanzi F, Picano E, Bolognese L, et al (1991) Inhibition of dipyridamole-induced ischemia by antianginal therapy in humans. Correlation with exercise electrocardiography. Circulation 83:1256–1262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferrara N, Coltorti F, Leosco D, et al (1995) Protective effect of beta-blockade on dipyridamole-induced myocardial ischaemia. Role of heart rate. Eur Heart J 16:903–908

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferrara N, Longobardi G, Nicolino A, et al (1992) Effect of beta-adrenoceptor blockade on dipyridamole-induced myocardial asynergies in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 70:724–727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Longobardi G, Ferrara N, Leosco D, et al (1995) Failure of protective effect of Captopril and enalapril on exercise and dipyridamole-induced myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 76:255–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fioretti PM, Poldermans D, Salustri A, et al (1994) Atropine increases the accuracy of dobut-amine stress echocardiography in patients taking beta-blockers. Eur Heart J 15:355–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dodi C, Pingitore A, Sicari R, et al (1997) Effects of antianginal therapy with a calcium antagonist and nitrates on dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography. Comparison with exercise electrocardiography. Eur Heart J 18:242–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Timothy Bricker J, et al (2002) ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 40:1531–1540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheitlin MD, Alpert JS, Armstrong WF, et al (1997) ACC/AHA guidelines for the clinical application of echocardiography: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:862–879

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (2001) Cardiac Stress Test Supplement. October 2001. http://www.ICI.org (Accessed March 21, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Picano, E. (2003). Diagnostic Results and Indications. In: Stress Echocardiography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05096-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05096-5_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-05098-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05096-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics