Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ad Hoc Open-ended Intergovernmental Group of Experts on Energy and Sustainable Development (2001): Report of the Ad Hoc Open-ended Intergovernmental Group of Experts on Energy and Sustainable Development. Second Session 26 February-2 March 2001 (E/CN.17//2001/15). Internet: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/enrexpert.htm. New York: United Nations (UN).

    Google Scholar 

  2. AEBIOM -Association Européenne Pour la Biomasse (1999): Statement of AEBIOM on the Green Paper From the Commission on Renewable Sources of Energy. Internet: http://www.ecop.ucl.ac.be/aebiom/publications/Paperl.html. Louvain-1a-Neuve, Belgien: AEBIOM.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agence France Press (2002): Central Asia: World Bank Chief in Talks Over Pipeline. Paris: Agence France Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andronova, N. G. und Schlesinger, M. E. (2001): Objective estimation of the probability density function for climate sensitivity. Journal of Geophysical Research 106, 22605–22611.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Angerer, G. (1995): Auf dem Weg zu einer ökologischen Stoffwirtschaft, Teil I: Die Rolle des Recyclings. GAIA 4 (2), 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Azar, G., Lindgren, K. und Persson, T. (2001): Carbon Sequestration from Fossil Fuels and Biomass — Long-term Potentials. Paper Presented at Second Nordig Minisymposium on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Goeteborg, October 26, 2001. Internet: . Göteborg: Entek.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bachu, S. (2000): Sequestration of CO2 in geological media: criteria and approach for site selection in response to climate change. Energy Conversion and Management 41, 953–970.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bächler, G., Böge, V., Klötzli, S., Libiszewski, S. und Spillmann, K. R. (1996): Kriegsursache Umweltzerstörung: Ökologische Konflikte in der Dritten Welt und Wege ihrer friedlichen Bearbeitung. Band 1. Chur, Zürich: Rüegger.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baklid, A., Korbol, R. und Owren, G. (1996): Sleipner west CO2 disposal, CO2 injection into a shallow water underground aquifer. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Paper 36600.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bates, J., Brand, C., Davison, P. und Hill, N. (2001): Economic Evaluation of Sectoral Emission Reduction Objectives for Climate Change. Economic Evaluation of Emissions Reductions in the Transport Sector of the EU. Bottom-up Analysis. Abingdon: AEA Technology Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Batley, S. L., Colbourne, D., Fleming, P. D. und Urwin, P. (2000): Citizen versus consumer: challenges in the UK green power market. Energy Policy 29, 479–487.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bauer, M. und Quintanilla, J. (2000): Conflicting energy, environment, economy policies in Mexico. Energy Policy 28, 321–326.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Beauchamp, E. G. (1997): Nitrous oxide emission from agricultural soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 77, 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Behera, D., Sood, P. und Singhi, S. (1998): Respiratory symptoms in Indian children exposed to different cooking fuels. JAPI 46 (2), 182–184.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bell, R. G. (2002): Are market-based instruments the right choice for countries in transition? Resources for the Future (146), 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  16. BfN — Bundesamt für Naturschutz (Hrsg.) (2002): Daten zum Naturschutz. Bonn: BfN.

    Google Scholar 

  17. BGR — Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (Hrsg.) (1998): Reserven, Ressourcen und Verfügbarkeit von Energierohstoffen. Hannover: BGR.

    Google Scholar 

  18. BGR — Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (2000): Geht die Kohlenwasserstoff-Ära zu Ende? Internet: http://www.bgr.de/bl23/kw_aera/kw_aera.htm. Hannover: BGR.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bharati, K., Mohanty, S. R., Rao, V. R. und Adhya, T. K. (2001): Influence of flooded and non-flooded conditions on methane flux from two soils planted to rice. Chemosphere — Global Change Science 3, 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  20. BMBF — Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (1995): Wasserstoff als Energieträger — Ergebnisse der Forschung der letzten 20 Jahre und Ausblick auf die Zukunft. Bericht zum Statusseminar. Berlin: BMBF Projektträger BEO.

    Google Scholar 

  21. BMU — Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (Hrsg.) (2000): Nationales Klimaschutzprogramm. Fünfter Bericht der Interministeriellen Arbeitsgruppe „CO2-Reduktion“. Berlin: BMU.

    Google Scholar 

  22. BMU — Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (Hrsg.) (2002a): Entwicklung der Erneuerbaren Energien — Aktueller Sachstand. Bonn: BMU.

    Google Scholar 

  23. BMU — Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (Hrsg.) (2002b): Erneuerbare Energien und nachhaltige Entwicklung. Berlin: BMU.

    Google Scholar 

  24. BMU — Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (Hrsg.) (2002c): Ökologische Begleitforschung zur Offshore-Windenergienutzung. Fachtagung des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit und des Projektträgers Jülich. Bremerhaven 28. und 29. Mai 2002. Berlin: BMU.

    Google Scholar 

  25. BMZ — Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (1999): Erneuerbare Energie für nachhaltige Entwicklung und Klimaschutz. Bonn, Berlin: BMZ.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Boman, U. R. und Turnbull, J. H. (1997): Integrated biomass energy systems and emissions of carbon dioxide. Biomass and Bioenergy 13, 333–343.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bond, G. und Carter, L. (1995): Financing energy projects. Experience of the International Finance Corporation. Energy Policy 23, 967–975.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bosch, H.-S. und Bradshaw, A. M. (2001): Kernfusion als Energiequelle der Zukunft. Physikalische Blätter (November), 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Boyd, P. W., Watson, A. I., Law, G. S., Abraham, E. R., Thill, T., Murdoch, R., Bakker, D. G. E., Bowie, A. R., Büßeier, K. O., Chang, H., Charette, M., Croot, P., Downing, K., Frew, R., Gall, M., Hadfield, M., Hall, J., Harvey, M., Jameson, G., LaRoche, J., Liddicoat, M., Ling, R., Maldonado, M. T., McKay, R. M., Nodder, S., Pickmere, S., Pridmore, R., Rintoul, S., Safi, K., Sutton, P., Strzepek, R., Tanneberger, K., Turner, S., Waite, T. und Zeldis, A. (2000): A mesoscale phytoplankton bloom in the polar Southern Ocean stimulated by iron fertilization. Nature 407, 695–702.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Börjesson, P., Gustavson, L., Christersson, L. und Linder, S. (1997): Future production and utilisation of biomass in Sweden: Potentials and CO2 mitigation. Biomass and Bioenergy 13, 399–412.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brauch, H. G. (1998): Klimapolitik der Schwellenstaaten Südkorea, Mexiko und Brasilien. Mosbach: Afes-Press Report.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Brockmann, K. L., Stronzik, M. und Bergmann, H. (1999): Emissionsrechtehandel — Eine neue Perspektive für die deutsche Klimapolitik nach Kioto. Heidelberg: Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Brown, C. E. (2002): World Energy Resources. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bruce, N., Perez-Padilla, R. und Albalak, R. (2000): Indoor air pollution in developing countries: a major environmental and public health challenge. Bulletin of the WHO 78 (9), 1078 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bruckner, T., Petschel-Held, G.,Toth, F. L., Füßel, H. M., Helm, G., Leimbach, M. und Schellnhuber, H. J. (1999): Climate change decision report and the tolerable windows approach. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 4, 217–234.

    Google Scholar 

  36. BTM Consult (2001): World Market Update 2000. Ringkø-bing: BTM Consult.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bundesverband Windenergie (2001): Von A bis Z — Fakten zur Windenergie.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bunn, G. (2002): Reducing the Threat of Nuclear Theft and Sabotage. IAEA Diskussionspapier, IAEA-SM-367/4/08. Wien: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Burger, A. und Hanhoff, I. (2002): Unterwegs in die nächste Dimension. Kassensturz — Strukturwandel durch Ökologische Finanzreform. Politische Ökologie (77–78), 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  40. CEFIR — Center for Economic and Financial Research und Club 2015 (2001): Russia in the WTO: Myths and Reality. Internet: http://www.hhs.se/site/Publications/WTO-report_0907.pdf. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics: CEFIR, Club 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  41. CENR- Committee on Energy and Natural Resources for Development (2000): Financial Mechanisms and Economic Instruments to Speed up the Investment in Sustainable Energy Development. Internet: http://www.un.org/esa/sust-dev/energy/cenr/e_cl4_2000_l.pdf. New York: United Nations Economic and Social Council.

    Google Scholar 

  42. CESCR — Comittee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (1991): The Right to Adequate Housing (Art. 11 (1): CESCR General Comment 4). Internet: http://www.unhchr.ch. New York: UNHCHR.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Chen, H., Zhou, H. und Ma, S. (2002): Brightness Program and its Progress. Peking: Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chisholm, S. W., Falkowski, P. G. und Cullen, J. J. (2001): Discrediting ocean fertilization. Science 249, 309–310.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ciais, P., Rasool, I., Steffen, W., Raupach, M., Donney, S., Hood, M., Heinze, G., Sabine, G., Hibbard, K. und Cihlar, J. (2003): The carbon conservation challenge. In: Integrated Global Observing Strategy (IGCO) (Hrsg.): Carbon Theme Report 2003. Paris: IGCO.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Clark, A. (2001): Implications of power sector reform in South Africa on poor people’s access to energy: lessons for Africa. In: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (Hrsg.): African High-level Regional Meeting on Energy and Sustainable Development. Nairobi: UNEP, 127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cnossen, S. und Vollebergh, H. R. J. (1992): Toward a global excise on carbon. National Tax Journal 35 (1), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Coles, S. L. (2001): Coral bleaching: what do we know and what can we do? In: Salm, R. V. und Coles, S. L. (Hrsg.): Coral Bleaching and Marine Protected Areas. Proceedings of the Workshop on Mitigating Coral Bleaching Impact Through MPA Design, Honolulu, Hawaii, 29–31 May 2001. Asia Pacific Coastal Marine Program Report 0102. Honolulu: The Nature Conservancy, 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  49. COM (2000): EU Policies and Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Towards a European Climate Change Programme (ECCP), Mitteilung der EU Kommission, Brüssel, COM(2000)88. Brüssel: EU-Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Cook, J. H., Beyea, J. und Keeler, K. H. (1991): Potential impacts of biomass production in the United States on biological diversity. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 16, 401–431.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Cook, I., Marbach, G., Di Pace, L., Girard, C. und Taylor, N. P. (2001): Safety and Environmental Impact of Fusion. European Fusion Development Agreement (EFDA) Report EFDA-S-RE-1.EUR (01) CCE-FU\FTC 8\5. Brüssel: EFDA.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Copeland, B. und Taylor, M. (2000): Free trade and global warming: a trade theory view of the Kyoto protocol. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper Series 7657. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Cottier, T. und Evtimov, E. (2000): Präferenzielle Abkommen der EG: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen im Rahmen der WTO. ZEuS 4, 477–505.

    Google Scholar 

  54. CRED — The Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (2003): Disaster Profiles. Internet: http://www.cred.be/emdat/disindex.htm. Brüssel: CRED.

    Google Scholar 

  55. CSE — Centre for Science and Environment (2001): Poles Apart. Global Environmental Negotiations No. 2. New Delhi: CSE.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Davidson, O. und Sokona, Y. (2001): Energy and sustainable development: key issues for Africa. In: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (Hrsg.): African High-level Regional Meeting on Energy and Sustainable Development. Nairobi: UNEP, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  57. DeLallo, M. R., Buchanan, T. L., White, J. S., Holt, N. A. und Wolk, R. H. (2000): Evaluation of innovative fossil cycles incorporating CO2 removal. Paper presented on the Gasification Technologies Conference, San Francisco California. Internet: http://www.gasification.org/98GTC/Gtc00360.pdf. Arlington, VA: Gasification Technologies Council.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Deutsche Bank Research (2001): Hoffnungsträger Erneuerbare Energien. DBR: Aktuelle Themen (195), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  59. de Vries, B., Bollen, J., Bouwan, L., den Elzen, M, Janssen, M. und Kreileman, E. (2000): Greenhouse gas emissions in an equity-, environment- and service-oriented world: an IMAGE-based scenario for the 21st century. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 63 (2–3), 137–174.

    Google Scholar 

  60. DFID — Department for International Development (Hrsg.) (2002): Energy for the Poor. Underpinning the Millenium Development Goals. London: DFID.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Dixon, J. A., Talbot, L. M. und Le Moigne, G. J. M. (1989): Dams and the Environment: Considerations in World Bank Projects. World Bank Technical Paper 110. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  62. DLR — Deutsche Gesellschaft für Luft- und Raumfahrt und DIW — Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (1990): Bedingungen und Folgen von Aufbaustrategien für eine solare Wasserstoffwirtschaft. Untersuchung für die Enquete-Kommission Technikfolgenabschätzung und -Bewertung des Dt. Bundestages. Bonn: DLR, DIW.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Drange, H., Alendal, G. und Johannessen, O. M. (2001): Ocean release of fossil fuel CO2: A case study. Geophysical Research Letters 28(1), 2637–2640.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Dreier, T. und Wagner, U (2000): Perspektiven einer Wasserstoffwirtschaft. Brennstoff Wärme Kraft (BWK) 12, 52.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Dröge, S. und Trabold, H. (2001): Umweltbezogene Verhaltens-kodizes für ausländische Direktinvestitionen: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. DIW-Arbeitspapier. Internet:

    Google Scholar 

  66. http://www.diw.de. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Duijm, B. (1998): Das Europäische System der Zentralbanken — ein Modell für ein Europäisches Kartellamt? Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik 47 (2), 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Dunkerley, J. (1995): Financing the energy sector in developing countries. Context and overview. Energy Policy (23), 929–939.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Dwinnell, J. H. (1949): Principles of Aerodynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  70. EBRD — European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (Hrsg.) (2001): Transition Report 2001. Energy in Transition. London: EBRD.

    Google Scholar 

  71. ECMT — European Conference of Ministers of Transport (Hrsg.) (2001): Sustainable Transport Policies. Paris: ECMT

    Google Scholar 

  72. Edenhofer, O., Kriegler, E. und Bauer, N. (2002): Szenarien zum Umbau des Energiesystems. Externes Gutachten für den WBGU Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  73. EEA — European Environment Agency (Hrsg.) (2001): TERM 2001. Indicators Tracking Transport and Environment Integration in the European Union. Kopenhagen: EEA.

    Google Scholar 

  74. EIA — Energy Information Administration (2000): The Changing Structure of the Electric Power Industry 2000: An Update. Internet: http://www.eia.doe.gov/bookshelf/elec-tric.html. Washington, DC: EIA.

    Google Scholar 

  75. EIA — Energy Information Administration (2001): International Energy Outlook 2001. Internet: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/index.html. Washington, DC: EIA.

    Google Scholar 

  76. EIA — Energy Information Administration (2002): Country Brief: Brazil. Internet: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/brazil.html. Washington, DC: EIA.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Energy Charter Secretariat (2000): Work Programme 2001. Internet: http://www.encharter.org/cDetail.jsp7contendID=6&topicID=13. Brüssel: Energy Charter Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Energy Star Australia (2002): Promoting Energy Star. Internet: http://www.energystar.gov.au/promo.html. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Enquete-Kommission „Schutz der Erdatmosphäre“ (Hrsg.) (1995): Klima und Mobilität. Bonn: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Enquete-Kommission “Nachhaltige Energieversorgung unter den Bedingungen der Globalisierung und der Liberalisierung“ (Hrsg.) (2001): Erster Bericht der Enquete-Kommission. Teilbericht zu dem Thema Nachhaltige Energieversorgung auf liberalisierten und globalisierten Märkten: Bestandsaufnahme und Ansatzpunkt. Bundestags-Drucksache 14/7509. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Enquete-Kommission „Nachhaltige Energieversorgung unter den Bedingungen der Globalisierung und der Liberalisierung“ (Hrsg.) (2002): Endbericht der Enquete-Kommission. Bundestags-Drucksache 14/9400. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Erdmann, G. (2001): Energiekonzepte für das 21. Jahrhundert. Internationale Politik 56 (1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  83. ESMAP — Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme (1998): Malawi Rural Energy and Institutional Development. Washington, DC: ESMAP.

    Google Scholar 

  84. ESMAP — Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme (1999): Uganda Rural Electrification Strategy Study. Final Report. Washington, DC: ESMAP.

    Google Scholar 

  85. ESMAP — Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme (2000): Subsidies and Sustainable Rural Energy Services: Can We Create Incentives Without Distorting Markets? Internet: http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/esmap/pdfs/010–00-subs_services.pdf. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  86. ESMAP — Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme (2001): Best Practice Manual: Promoting Decentralized Electrification Investment. Internet: http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/esmap/publication/bestpractice.html. Washington, DC: ESMAP.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Espey, S. (2001): Internationaler Vergleich energiepolitischer Instrumente zur Förderung von regenerativen Energien in ausgewählten Industrieländern. Norderstedt: Books on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Esty, D C. (1995): Private Sector Foreign Investment and the Environment. RECIEL 4, 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  89. ETH-Rat (1998): 2000 Watt-Gesellschaft — Modell Schweiz Strategie Nachhaltigkeit im ETH-Bereich. Internet: http://www.novatlantis.ch/projects/2000W/brochure/resour-ces/pdf/ge_brochure.pdf. Zürich: ETH Wirtschaftsplattform.

    Google Scholar 

  90. ETSU — Renewable and Energy Efficiency Organisation (1998): A Structured State-of-the-Art Survey and Review. FANTASIE Contract No. ST-96-AM-1109, Deliverable 8. Internet: http://www.etsu.com/fantasie/public.html. Oxfordshire: ETSU.

    Google Scholar 

  91. EU-Kommission (1998): Energie für die Zukunft: Erneuerbare Energieträger. Weißbuch für eine Gemeinschaftsstrategie und Aktionsplan. Brüssel: Kommission der Europäischen Gemeinschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  92. EU-Kommission (1999a): Elektrizität aus erneuerbaren Energieträgern und der Elektrizitätsbinnenmarkt. Arbeitsdokument der Kommission, 14.4.1999; SEK (1999)470 endg. Brüssel: EU-Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  93. EU-Kommission (1999b): Energy in Europe. Economic Foundations for Energy Policy. Special Issue: December 1999. Internet: http://www.shared-analysis.fhg.de/Publ-fr.htm. Brüssel: EU-Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  94. EU-Kommission (Hrsg.) (2000a): Grünbuch — Hin zu einer Strategie für Energieversorgungssicherheit. Brüssel: EU-Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  95. EU-Kommission (2000b): Nukleare Sicherheit in den Neuen Unabhängigen Staaten und den mittel- und osteuropäischen Ländern. Internet: http://www.europa.eu.int/scaplus/leg/de/lvb/127036.htm. Brüssel: EU-Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  96. EU-Kommission (2001a): Energy & Transport in Figures. Internet: http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/energy_transport/etif/index.html. Brüssel. EU-Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  97. EU-Kommission (2001b): Förderung der Stromerzeugung aus erneuerbaren Energiequellen (Förderung des EE-Stroms). Internet: http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/energy/library/renouvelables-de.pdf. Brüssel: EU-Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  98. EU-Kommission (2001c): White Paper. European Transport Policy for 2010: Time to Decide. Internet: http://europa.eu.int/comm/energy_transport/en/lb_en.html. Brüssel: EU-Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  99. EU-Kommission (Hrsg.) (2001d): Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001 on the Promotion of Electricity Produced from Renewable Energy Sources in the Internal Electricity Market. Official Journal of the European Communities 2001/77/EC, L 283/33–40. Brüssel: EU-Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  100. EU-Kommission (2002): Mitteilung der Kommission an den Rat und das Europäische Parlament: Halbzeitbewertung der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik. Brüssel: Europäische Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  101. EU-Kommission (Hrsg.) (2003): Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings. Official Journal of the European Communities L 1/65,4.1.2003. Brüssel: EU-Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  102. EU-Parlament (2001): Possible Toxic Effects From the Nuclear Reprocessing Plants at Sellafield (UK) and Cap de La Hague (France). Bericht des STOA, PE. Nr. 303.110. Luxemburg: EU-Parlament.

    Google Scholar 

  103. EUREC Agency (Hrsg.) (2002): The Future for Renewable Energy. London: James & James.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Eurostat (2002): UN-Weltgipfel für nachhaltige Entwicklung -6% des Energieverbrauchs in der EU entfällt auf erneuerbare Energieträger. Internet: http://europa.eu.int/comm/ eurostat/Public/datashop/print-product/DE?catalogue=Euro stat&product=8–23082002-DE-AP-DE&mode=download. Brüssel: Statistisches Amt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  105. FAO — Food and Agriculture Organisation (2002): FAOSTAT Statistical Database. Internet: http://apps.fao.org/default.htm. Rom: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  106. FAO — Food and Agriculture Organisation Land and Plant Nutrition Management Service (2002): TERRASTAT Land-resource Potential and Constraints Statistics at Country and Regional Level. Internet: http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/agll/ter-rastat/. Rom: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Fearnside, P. M. (1995): Hydroelectric Dams in the Brazilian Amazon as Sources of „Greenhouse“ Gases. Environmental Conservation 22 (1), 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Fearnside, P. M. (1997): Greenhouse-gas emissions from Amazonian hydroelectric reservoirs: the example of Brazil’s Tucu-rui Dam as compared to fossil fuel alternatives. Environmental Conservation 24 (1), 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Feldmann, G. C. und Gradwohl, J. (1996): Oil Pollution. Cambridge, MA: Smithsonian Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Fesa — Förderverein Energie- und Solaragentur Freiburg (2002): Land- und forstwirtschaftliche Biomasse zur Energiegewinnung. Freiburg: fesa.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Fischedick, M., Nitsch, J., Lechtenböhmer, S., Hanke, T., Bar-thel, C., Jungbluth, C., Assmann, D., vor der Brüggen, T., Trieb, F., Nast, M., Langniß, O. und Brischke, L.-A. (2002): Langfristszenarien für eine nachhaltige Energieversorgung in Deutschland. Forschungsvorhaben für das Umweltbundesamt. Berlin: Umweltbundesamt (UBA).

    Google Scholar 

  112. Fischer, G. und Schrattenholzer, L. (2001): Global bioenergy potentials through 2050. Biomass and Bioenergy 20, 151–159.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Fischer, G., van Velthuizen, H., Shah, M. und Nachtergäle, F. O. (2001): Global Agro-ecological Assessment for Agriculture in the 21st Century. Laxenburg, Rom: IIASA, FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Fischer, G., van Velthuizen, H., Shah, M. und Nachtergäle, F. O. (2002): Global Agro-ecological Assessment for Agriculture in the 21st Century: Methodology and Results. Laxenburg, Rom: IIASA, FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Fleig, J. (Hrsg.) (2000): Zukunftsfähige Kreislaufwirtschaft. Mit Nutzenverkauf, Langlebigkeit und Aufarbeitung ökonomisch und ökologisch wirtschaften. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  116. FNR — Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (Hrsg.) (2000): Leitfaden Bioenergie — Planung, Betrieb und Wirtschaftlichkeit von Bioenergieanlagen. Gülzow: FNR.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H., Sokolov, A. P., Allen, M. R. und Webster, M. D. (2002): Quantifying in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations. Science 295, 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Freibauer, A. (2002): Biogenic Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture in Europe — Quantification and Mitigation. Agrarwissenschaften II (Agrarökonomie, Agrartechnik und Tierproduktion). Hohenheim: Institut für Landwirtschaftliche Betriebslehre (410b) der Universität Hohenheim.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Freibauer, A., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Smith, P. und Verhagen, J. (2002): Background Paper on Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils under Article 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol. European Climate Change Programme (ECCP), Working Group Agriculture, Subgroup Soils. Brüssel: Europäische Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Freund, R. (2002): Einspar-Contracting bei Gemeindegebäuden. Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen 52 (7), 472–475.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Fritsche, U. R. und Matthes, F. C. (2002): Changing Course. A Contribution to a Global Energy Strategy (GES). External Review Draft. Berlin: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Froggart, A. (2002): World Nuclear Industry Status Report. Studie im Auftrag von Greenpeace International. Amsterdam: Greenpeace International.

    Google Scholar 

  123. G8 Renewable Energy Task Force (2001): Final Report. Internet: http://www.renewabletaskforce.org/report.asp. G8.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Gattuso, J. P., Allemand, D. und Frankignolle, M. (1999): Photosynthesis and calcification at cellular, organismal, and community levels in coral reefs: a review on interactions and control by carbonate chemistry. Am. Zool. 39, 160–183.

    Google Scholar 

  125. GEF — Global Environment Facility (2000): GEF Programmes. Internet: http://www.gefweb.org/PROGLIST.pdf. Washington, DC: GEF.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Gerling, P. und May, F. (2001): Stellungnahme vor der Enquete-Kommission Nachhaltige Energieversorgung des Deutschen Bundestages. Internet: http://www.bundestag.de/gremien/ ener/ener_stell_gerl.pdf. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Ghosh, S. (2002): Electricity consumption and economic growth in India. Energy Policy 30, 125–129.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Göttlicher, G. (1999): Energetik der Kohlendioxidrückhaltung in Kraftwerken. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI zur Energietechnik. Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Goldemberg, J. (1996): A note on the energy intensity of developing countries. Energy Policy 24, 759–761.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Goldemberg, J. (2001): Energy and Human Well Being. HDRO-Human Development Office. Internet: http://www. undp.org/hdro/occ.htm#2. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Golob, T. F. und Regan, A. C. (2001): Impacts of information technology on personal travel and commercial vehicle operations: research challenges and opportunities. Transportation Research, Part C, Emerging Technologies 9, 87–121.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Goor, F., Dubuisson, X. und Jossart, J.-M. (2000): Adäquation, impact environnemental et bilan d’énergie de quelques cultures énergétiques en Belgique. Cahiers Agricultures 9, 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Goulder, L. H. (1995): Environmental taxation and the double dividend: a readers’ guide. International Tax and Public Finance 2, 157–183.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Goulder, L. und Mathai, K. (2000): Optimal CO2 abatement in the presence of induced technological change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Graham, R. L., Downing, M. und Walsh, M. E. (1996): A framework to assess regional environmental impacts of dedicated energy crop production. Environmental Management 20, 475–485.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Grassi, G. (1999): Modern bioenergy in the European Union. Renewable Energy 16, 985–990.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Green, M. J. B. und Paine, J. (1997): State of the World’s Protected Areas at the End of the Twentieth Century. Paper presented at IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas Symposium on Protected Areas in the 21st Century: From Islands to Networks. Albany, Australia, 24–29th November 1997. Cambridge, UK: World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC).

    Google Scholar 

  138. Green, M. A., Emery, K., King, D. L., Igari, S. und Warta, W. (2002): Progress in Photovoltaics. Research and Applications 10, 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Greenpeace (Hrsg.) (2002): Große Tankerkatastrophen 1967–2002. Internet: http://www.greenpeace.org/deutschland/fak-ten/klima/erdoel-gefahr-fuer-die-umwelt/große-tankerkat-astrophen-1967–2001. Amsterdam: Greenpeace.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Greiner, S., Großmann, H., Koopmann, G., Matthies, K., Michaelowa, A. und Steger, S. (2001): WTO-/GATT-Rahmen-bedingungen und Reformbedarf für die Energiepolitik sowie die Rolle der Entwicklungspolitik im Kontext einer außen-handels- und klimapolitischen Orientierung. Gutachten im Auftrag der Enquete-Kommission „Nachhaltige Energieversorgung“ des Deutschen Bundestages. Hamburg: Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).

    Google Scholar 

  141. Grimston, M. C., Karakoussis, V., Fouquet, R., van der Vorst, R., Pearson, P. und Leach, M. (2001): The European and global potential of carbon dioxide sequestration in tackling climate change. Climate Policy 1, 155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Gröger, K. (2000): Structural Fiscal Measures and Electronic Tolling. The German Experience. ECMT Joint Conference on Smart CO2 Reductions. Non-product Measures for Reducing Emissions from Vehicles, TURIN 2–3 March 2000. Internet: http://wwwl.oecd.org/cem/Topics/env/CO2turin/CO2groeger.pdf. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Groscurth, H., Beeck, H. und Zisler, S. (2000): Erneuerbare Energien im liberalisierten Markt. Elektrizitätswirtschaft 99 (24), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Grupp, M., Bergler, H., Biermann, E., Klingshirn, A., de Lange, E. und Wentzel, M. (2002): Solar Cooker Field Test in South Africa — Phase 2 — Memo: Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions by Different Cooking Fuels and the Potential GHG Impact of Solar Stoves — Draft 2. Eschborn: GTZ, DME.

    Google Scholar 

  145. Gsänger, S. (2001): Germany’s EEG goes global. New Energy 2, 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  146. GTZ — Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (1998): GTZ Microfinance-Multinationals: Microfinance-Netzwerke und Geberinitiativen im Überblick. Internet: http://www.gtz.de/themen/ebene3.asp?Thema=112&ProjectId=212&Rei henfolge=5&spr=1. Eschborn: GTZ. Microfinance Operations. Division 41.

  147. Gupta, J., Vlasblom, J. und Kroeze, C. (2001): An Asian Dilemma: Modernising the Electricity Sector in China and India in the Context of Rapid Economic Growth and the Concern for Climate Change. Report number E-01/04. Amsterdam, Wageningen: Dutch National Research Programme on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change (NOP).

    Google Scholar 

  148. Hall, D. O. und House, J. I. (1995): Biomass energy in Western Europe to 2050. Land Use Policy 12, 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Halsnaes, K., Markandya, A., Sathaye, J., Boyd, R., Hunt, A. und Taylor, T. (2001): Transport and the Global Environment. Accounting for GHG Reductions in Policy Analysis. Internet: http://www.uccee.org/OverlaysTransport/TransportGlobalO verlays.pdf. Roskilde, Dänemark: UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  150. Hamacher, T. und Bradshaw, A. M. (2001): Fusion as a Future Power Source: Recent Achievements and Prospects. Proceedings of the 18th World Energy Congress. Buenos Aires: World Energy Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  151. Hanegraaf, M. C., Biewinga, E. E. und van der Bijl, G. (1998): Assessing the ecological and economic sustainability of energy crops. Biomass and Bioenergy 15 (4–5), 345–355.

    Google Scholar 

  152. Hebling, C., Glunz, S. W., Schumacher, J. O. und Knobloch, J. (1997): High-Efficiency (19.2%) Silicon Thin-Film Solar Cells with Interdigitated Emitter and Base Front-Contacts. 14th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Barcelona. Bedford: Stephens.

    Google Scholar 

  153. Hein, M., Meusel, M., Baur, C., Dimroth, F., Lange, G., Siefer, G., Tibbits, T. N. D., Bett, A. W., Andreev, V. M. und Rumyantsev, V. D. (2001): Characterisation of a 25% high-efficiency fresnel lens module with GaInP/GaInAs dual-junction concentrator solar cells. Proceedings of the 17th EU-PVSEC Munich (eingereicht).

    Google Scholar 

  154. Hendricks, C. A. und Turkenburg, W. C. (1997): Towards Meeting CO2 Emission Targets: The Role of Carbon Dioxide Removal. IPTS Report 16, 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  155. Hendriks, C.A., Wildenborg, A. F. B., Blok, K., Floris, F. und van Wees, J. D. (2001): Costs of Carbon Dioxide Removal by Underground Storage. In: Williams, D., Durie, B., MacMullan, P., Paulson, C. und Smith, A. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing, 967–972.

    Google Scholar 

  156. Herzog, H. (2001): What future for carbon capture and sequestration? Environmental Science and Technology 35, 148A–153A.

    Google Scholar 

  157. Hoegh-Guldberg, O. (1999): Climate change, coral bleaching and the future of the world’s coral reefs. Marine and Freshwater Research (50), 839–866.

    Google Scholar 

  158. Hoffert, M. I., Caldeira, K. und Jain, A. K. (1998): Energy implications of future stabilization of atmospheric CO2 content. Nature 395, 881–884.

    Google Scholar 

  159. Holloway, S. (1997): Safety of the underground disposal of carbon dioxide. Energy Conversion and Management 38 (Supplement), 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  160. Holm, D. (2000): Interventions and Cost Savings in Environmentally Sound Low-Cost Energy Efficient Housing Study for USAID. Washington, DC: The United Nations Energy for International Development (USAID).

    Google Scholar 

  161. Horlacher, H.-B. (2002): Globale Potenziale der Wasserkraft. Externes Gutachten für den WBGU: Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  162. Horta, K., Round, R. und Young, Z. (2002): The Global Environmental Facility. The First Ten Years — Growing Pains or Inherent Flaws. Internet: http://www.halifaxinitiative. org/hi.php/Publications/333. Halifax, Kanada: Halifax Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  163. Hu, P. S. (1997): Estimates of 1996 U.S. Military Expenditures on Defending Oil Supplies from the Middle East: Literature Review. Revised August. Internet: http://www-cta.ornl.gov/Publications/military.pdf. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory for the U.S. Energy Department.

    Google Scholar 

  164. Hulscher, W. (1997): Renewable Energy in Thailand. Internet: http://www.rwedp.org/acrobat/p_carbon.pdf. Rom: FAO Regional Wood Energy Development Programme in Asia (RWEDP).

    Google Scholar 

  165. Huynen, M. und Martens, P. (2002): Future Health. The Health Dimension in Global Scenarios. Maastricht: ICIS, Maastricht University.

    Google Scholar 

  166. IABG — Industrieanlagen-Betriebsgesellschaft mbH (Hrsg.) (2000a): FANTASIE „Synthesis of Impact Assessment and Potentials“. Project Funded by the European Commission Under the Transport RTD Programme of the 4th Framework Programme. Internet: http://www.etsu.com/fantasie/fanta-sie.htm Ottobrunn: IABG.

    Google Scholar 

  167. IABG — Industrieanlagen-Betriebsgesellschaft mbH (Hrsg.) (2000b): FANTASIE „Forecasting and Assessment of New Technologies and Transport Systems an their Impacts on the Environment“. Final Report. Project funded by the European Commission under the Transport RTD Programme of the 4th Framework Programme. Internet: http://www. etsu.com/fantasie/fantasie.htm. Ottobrunn: IABG.

    Google Scholar 

  168. IAEA — International Atomic Energy Agency (1998): Technical Basis for the ITER Final Design Report, Cost Review and Safety Analysis (FDR). ITER EDA Documentation Series No. 16. Wien: IAEA.

    Google Scholar 

  169. IAEA — International Atomic Energy Agency (2001): Final Report of the ITER EDA, ITER EDA Documentation Series No. 21. Wien: IAEA.

    Google Scholar 

  170. ICOLD — International Commission on Large Dams (1998): World Register of Dams. Paris: ICOLD.

    Google Scholar 

  171. ICRP — International Commission on Radiological Protection (Hrsg.) (1991): Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  172. IEA — International Energy Agency (Hrsg.) (1997): Transport, Energy and Climate Change. Paris: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  173. IEA — International Energy Agency (Hrsg.) (1998): Technical Basis for the ITER Final Design Report. Cost Review and Safety Analysis (FDR). Wien: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  174. IEA — International Energy Agency (Hrsg.) (1999): World Energy Outlook 1999. Looking at Energy Subsidies: Getting the Prices Right. Paris: OECD, IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  175. IEA — International Energy Agency (2000): Energy Technology and Climate Change — A Call to Action. Paris: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  176. IEA — International Energy Agency (Hrsg.) (2001a): Competition in Electricity Markets. Paris: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  177. IEA — International Energy Agency (Hrsg.) (2001b): World Energy Outlook 2000. Paris: OECD, IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  178. IEA — International Energy Agency (Hrsg.) (2001c): Things That Go Blip In the Night — Standby Power and How to Limit it. Paris: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  179. IEA — International Energy Agency (Hrsg.) (2002a): Russia Energy Survey 2002. Paris: OECD, IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  180. IEA — International Energy Agency (Hrsg.) (2002b): Energy Policies of IEA Countries: The United States 2002 Review. Paris: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  181. IEA — International Energy Agency (Hrsg.) (2002c): World Energy Outlook 2002. Paris: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  182. IEA — International Energy Agency (Hrsg.) (2003): World Energy Outlook 2003. Insights: Global Energy Investment Outlook. Paris: IEA (noch nicht erschienen).

    Google Scholar 

  183. IfE/TU München (2003): Lehrstuhl für Energiewirtschaft und Kraftwerkstechnik der Technischen Universität München. Vorlesungsunterlagen.

    Google Scholar 

  184. IFRC-RCS — International Federation of Red Cross und RCS — Red Crescent Societies (2001): World Disasters Report. Genf: IFRC-RCS.

    Google Scholar 

  185. IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Hrsg.) (1996): Climate Change 1995. Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific Technical Analyses. Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the IPCC Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  186. IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Hrsg.) (2000a): Land Use, Land-use Change, and Forestry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  187. IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000b): Emissions Scenarios. Special Report of Working Group III of the IPCC Genf: IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  188. IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Hrsg.) (2001a): Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. IPCC Third Assessment Report. Summary for Policymakers. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  189. IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Hrsg.) (2001b): Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Third Assessment Report. Summary for Policymakers. Draft. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  190. IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Hrsg.) (2001c): Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  191. IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001d): Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  192. IPS — Institute for Policy Studies (1999): OPIC, Ex-Im and Climate Change: Business as Usual? Internet: http://www. seen.org/oeordonl.html. Washington, DC: IPS.

    Google Scholar 

  193. IPTS — Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (2001): Expert Panel on Sustainability, Environment and Natural Resources. Enlargement Futures Project. Final Report. Internet: http://www.jrc.es/projects/enlargement/. Sevilla: IPTS.

    Google Scholar 

  194. ISIS — Institute for Science and International Security (2000): Special Section: Nuclear Terrorism. Internet: http://www.isis-online.org. Washington, DC: ISIS.

    Google Scholar 

  195. Iten, R., Oettli, B., Jochem, E. und Mannsbart, W. (2001): Förderung des Exports im Bereich der Energietechnologien. Studie im Auftrag des Bundesamtes für Energie. Zürich, Karlsruhe: INFRAS und Fraunhofer Institut Systemtechnik und Innovationsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  196. Izaguirre, A. K. (2000): Private Participation in Energy. Private Sector Note No. 208. Internet: http://rru.worldbank.org/View-point/HTMLNotes/250/250Izagu-101502.pdf. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  197. Jabir, I. (2001): The shift in US oil demand and its impact on OPEC’s market share. Energy Economics 23, 659–666.

    Google Scholar 

  198. Jantzen, J., Cofala, J. und de Haan, B. J. (2000): Technical Report on Enlargement. RIVM report 481505022. Internet: http://www.europe.eu.int/comm/environment/enveco/prio-rity-study/enlargement.pdf. Den Haag: RIVM.

    Google Scholar 

  199. Jenzen, H. (1998): Energiesteuern im nationalen und internationalen Recht: eine verfassungs-, europa- und welthandelsrechtliche Untersuchung. Frankfurt/M: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  200. Jochem, E. (1991): Long-term potentials of rational energy use — the unknown possibilities of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Energy & Environment (2), 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  201. Jochem, E. und Turkenburg, W. (2003): Long-term potentials of energy and material efficiency. Energy & Environment (eingereicht).

    Google Scholar 

  202. Johansson, B. und Ahman, M. (2002): A Comparison of Technologies for Carbon-neutral Passenger Transport. Transportation Research Part D 7. Internet: http://www.elsevier com/locate/trd. Dordrecht: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  203. Johnson, S., McMillan, J. und Woodruff, C. (1999): Property Rights, Finance and Entrepreneurship. EBRD Working Paper 43. London: EBRD.

    Google Scholar 

  204. Jotzo, F. und Michaelowa, A. (2002): Estimating the CDM market under the Marrakech Accords. In: Climate Policy 2 (2–3), 179–201.

    Google Scholar 

  205. Kämpf, K., Schulz, J., Walter, C., Benz, T., Steven, C., Hülser, W. (2000): Umweltwirkungen von Verkehrsinformations- und -leitsystemen im Straßenverkehr. Berlin: Umweltbundesamt (UBA).

    Google Scholar 

  206. Kainer, A. und Spielkamp, R. (1999): Gebündelte Macht. Entgleitet die Liberalisierung in Oligopolstrukturen? Frankfurt/M.: FAZ 2783/B3.

    Google Scholar 

  207. Kaltschmitt, M., Reinhardt, G. und Stelzer, T. (1997): Life cycle analysis of biofuels under different environmental aspects. Biomass and Bioenergy 12, 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  208. Kaltschmitt, M., Bauen, A. und Heinz, A. (1999): Perspektiven einer energetischen Nutzung organischer Ernte- und Produktionsrückstände in Entwicklungsländern. Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart. Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung.

    Google Scholar 

  209. Kaltschmitt, M., Merten, D., Fröhlich, N. und Nill, M. (2002): Energiegewinnung aus Biomasse. Externes Gutachten für den WBGU: Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  210. Kashiwagi, T. (1995): Chapter 20. In: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (Hrsg.): Second Assessment Report. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 649–677.

    Google Scholar 

  211. Kebede, B. und Kedir, E. (2001). Energy Subsidies and the Urban Poor in Ethiopia: The Case of Kerosene and Electricity. Draft Report. Nairobi: African Energy Policy Research Network (AFREPREN).

    Google Scholar 

  212. Keilhacker, M., Gibson, A., Gormezano, C., Lomas, P. J., Thomas, P. R., Watkins, M. L., Andrew, P., Balet, B., Borba, D. und JET Team (1999): High fusion performance from deuterium-tritium plasmas in JET Nuclear Fusion 39 (2), 209–235.

    Google Scholar 

  213. Keohane, R. O. (1996): Analyzing the effectiveness of international environmental institutions. In: Keohane, R. O. und Levy, M. (Hrsg.): Institutions for Environmental Aid: Pitfalls and Promise. Cambridge, MA, London: Cambridge University Press, 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  214. KfW — Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (Hrsg.) (2001): Stellungnahme zu einem Fragekatalog der Enquete-Kommission Nachhaltige Energieversorgung. Thema: Neue Institutionen zur Bewältigung globaler Umwelt- und Energieprobleme und Probleme bei der Finanzierung von Projekten zur Energieversorgung in den Entwicklungs- und Transformationsländern. Berlin: KfW.

    Google Scholar 

  215. Kheshgi, H. S., Prince, R. C. und Marland, G. (2000): The potential of biomass fuels in the context of global climate change: Focus on transportation fuels. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 25, 199–244.

    Google Scholar 

  216. Klare, M. (2001): The New Geography of Conflict. Foreign Affairs 80 (3), 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  217. Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F. und Plattner, G.-K. (2002): Constraint on radiative forcing and future climate change from observations and climate model ensembles. Nature 416, 719–723.

    Google Scholar 

  218. Kriegler, E. und Bruckner, T. (2003): Sensitivity analysis of emissions corridors for the 21st century. Climatic Change (eingereicht).

    Google Scholar 

  219. Kronshage, S. und Trieb, F. (2002): Berechnung von Weltpotenzialkarten. Externes Gutachten für den WBGU, Stuttgart: Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  220. Kulshreshtha, S. N., Junkins, B. und Desjardins, S. (2000): Prioritizing greenhouse gas emission mitigation measures for agriculture. Agricultural Systems 66, 145–166.

    Google Scholar 

  221. Kutter, A. (2002): Neue Herausforderungen an die GEF DNR EU-Rundschreiben 09.02, 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  222. Leach, G. (1986): Energy and Growth. London: Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  223. Lee, J. J., Unander, F., Murtishaw, S. und Ting, M. (2001): Historical and future trends in aircraft performance, cost and emissions. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 26 (11), 167–200.

    Google Scholar 

  224. Leimbach, M. und Bruckner, T. (2001): Influence of economic constraints on the shape of emission corridors. Computational Economics 18, 173–191.

    Google Scholar 

  225. Lerer, L. B. und Scudder, T. (1999): Health impacts of large dams. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 19, 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  226. Levine, M., Koomey, J., McMahin, J., Sanstad, A. und Hirst, E. (1995): Energy efficiency policies and market failures. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment (20), 535–555.

    Google Scholar 

  227. Lewandowski, L., Clifton-Brown, J. G. und Walsh, M. (2000): Miscanthus: European experience with a novel energy crop. Biomass and Bioenergy 19, 209–227.

    Google Scholar 

  228. Lookman, A. A. und Rubin, E. S. (1998): Barriers to adopting least-cost particulate control strategies for Indian power plants. Energy Policy 26 (14), 1053–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  229. LSMS — Living Standard Measurement Study (2002): LSMS Household Surveys. Internet: http://www.worldbank. org/lsms/. Washington, DC: World Bank’s LSMS.

    Google Scholar 

  230. Luther, J., Preiser, K. und Willeke, G. (2003): Solar modules and photovoltaic systems. In: Bubenzer, A. und Luther, J. (Hrsg.): Photovoltaics Guidebook for Decision Makers. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokio: Springer, 41–106.

    Google Scholar 

  231. Luukkanen, J. und Kaivo, J. (2002): ASEAN Tigers and Sustai-nability of Energy Use — Decomposition Analysis of Energy and CO2 Efficiency Dynamics. Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere. Department of Regional Studies and Environmental Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  232. Lux-Steiner, M. C. und Willeke, G. (2001): Strom von der Sonne. Physikalische Blätter (11), 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  233. Mahmood, K. (1987): Reservoir Sedimentation: Impact, Extent and Mitigation. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  234. Margolis, R. M. und Kammen, D. W. (1999): Underinvestment: the energy technology and R&D policy challenge. Science 285, 690–692.

    Google Scholar 

  235. Markels Jr., M. und Barber, R. T. (2001): Sequestration of CO2 by Ocean Fertilization. Poster Presentation at NETL Conference on Carbon Sequestration. Washington, DC: Conference Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  236. Marrison, C. I. und Larson, E. D. (1996): A preliminary analysis of the biomass energy production potential in Africa in 2025 considering projected land needs for food production. Biomass and Bioenergy 10, 337–351.

    Google Scholar 

  237. Martin, J. H., Coale, K. H., Johnson, K. S., Fitzwater, S. E., Gordon, R. M., Tanner, S. J., Hunter, C. N., Elrod, V. A., Nowicki, J. L., Coley, T. L., Barber, R. T., Lindley, S., Watson, A. J., Van Scoy, K., Law, C. S., Liddicoat, M. I., Ling, R., Stanton, T., Stockel, J., Collins, C., Anderson, A., Bidigare, R., Ondrusek, M., Latasa, M., Millero, F. J., Lee, K., Yao, W., Zhang, J. Z., Fredrich, G., Sakamoto, C., Chavez, F., Buck, K., Kolber, Z., Green, R., Falkowski, P.G., Chisholm, S.W., Hoge, F., Swift, R., Yungle, J., Turner, S., Nightingale, P. l., Hatton, A., Liss, P. und Tindale, N. W. (1994): Testing the iron hypothesis in ecosystems of the equatorial Pacific. Nature 371, 123–129.

    Google Scholar 

  238. Maskus, K. E. (2000): Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  239. Matthes, F. C. (1999): Führen Stromexporte aus Osteuropa die Bemühungen um Klimaschutz und Atomausstieg ad absurdum? Internet: http://www.oeko.de/bereiche/energie/docu-ments/ostimport.pdf. Freiburg: Öko-Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  240. Maurer, C. und Bhandari, R. (2000): The Climate of Export Credit Agencies. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute (WRI).

    Google Scholar 

  241. Maurer, C. (2002): The Transition from Fossil to Renewable Energy Systems: What Role for Export Credit Agencies? Externes Gutachten für den WBGU: Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  242. McAllister, D., Craig, J., Davidson, N., Murray, D. und Seddon, M. (2000): Biodiversity Impacts of Large Dams. Contributing Paper prepared for the Thematic Review II.1 of the World Commission on Dams. Internet: http://www.damsreport.org/ docs/kbase/contrib/env245.pdf. Kapstadt: World Commission on Dams (WCD).

    Google Scholar 

  243. McCully, P. (1996): Silenced Rivers. The Ecology and Politics of Large Dams. London, New Jersey: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  244. Melchert, A. (1998): Möglichkeiten des Least-Cost Planning zur Energiekostenminimierung für den Haushaltssektor in der Elektrizitätswirtschaft. Dissertation. Berlin: Technische Universität.

    Google Scholar 

  245. Messner, S. und Schrattenholzer, L. (2000): MESSAGE-MACRO: Linking an energy supply model with a macroeco-nomic module and solving it iteratively. Energy 25, 267–282.

    Google Scholar 

  246. Michaud, C. M., Murray, C. J. L. und Bloom, B. R. (2001): Burden of disease — implications for future research. JAMA 285 (5), 535–539.

    Google Scholar 

  247. Milly, P. C. D., Wetherald, R. T., Dunne, K. A. und Delworth, T. L. (2002): Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature 415, 514–517.

    Google Scholar 

  248. Ministry of Trade and Industry (1999): Greenhouse Gas Reduction by Bioenergy Based on the Targets of the Action Plan. Internet: http://www.vtt.fi/ene/tuloksia/uusiutuvat/Ed-kalvot-engl.ppt. Espoo, Finnland: VTT Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  249. Mitra, S., Jain, M. G., Kumar, S., Bandyopadhyay, S. K. und Kalra, N. (1999): Effect of rice cultivars on methane emission. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 73, 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  250. Morita, T., Nakicenovic, N. und Robinson, J. (2000): Overview of mitigation scenarios for global climate stabilization based on new IPCC emission scenarios (SRES). Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 3, 65–88.

    Google Scholar 

  251. Morse, E. L. (1999): A new political economy of oil? Journal of International Affairs 53 (1), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  252. Moss, D., Davies, C. und Roy, D. (1996): CORINE Biotope Sites. Database Status and Perspectives 1995. Kopenhagen: European Environment Agency (EEA).

    Google Scholar 

  253. Muchlinski, P. (1998): Towards a multilateral investment agreement (MAI). In: Weiss, F. (Hrsg.): International Economic Law With a Human Face. Den Haag: Kluwer Law International, 429–451.

    Google Scholar 

  254. Müller, F. (2002): Energiepolitische Interessen in Zentralasien. Das Parlament — Beilage “Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte” (B8–02), 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  255. Münchner Rückversicherung (2001): Topics 2001. Jahresrückblick Naturkatastrophen. Internet: http://www.munich re.com/pdf/topics_2001_d.pdf. München: Münchner Rückversicherung.

    Google Scholar 

  256. Murphy, J.T. (2001): Making the energy transition in rural East Africa: is leapfrogging an alternative? Technological Forecasting & Social Change 68, 173–193.

    Google Scholar 

  257. Murray, C. und Lopez, A. (Hrsg.) (1996): Global Burden of Disease. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  258. Nakashiki, N. und Oshumi, T. (1997): Dispersion of CO2 injected into the ocean at the intermediate depth. Energy Conversion and Mangement 38S, 355–360.

    Google Scholar 

  259. Nakicenovic, N., Grübler, A. und McDonald, A. (1998): Global Energy Perspectives. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  260. Nakicenovic, N. und Riahi, K. (2001): An Assessment of Technological Change Across Selected Energy Scenarios. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA).

    Google Scholar 

  261. Nash, L. (1993): Water quality and health. In: Gleick, P. H. (Hrsg.): Water in Crisis — A Guide to the World’s Fresh Water Resources. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  262. National Energy Policy Development Group (Hrsg.) (2001): National Energy Policy Report. Washington, DC: National Energy Policy Development Group.

    Google Scholar 

  263. Newman, P. und Kenworthy, M. (1990): Cities and Automobile Dependence. London: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  264. Nitsch, J. und Staiß, F. (1997): Perspektiven eines solaren Energieverbundes für Europa und den Mittelmeerraum. In: Brauch, H. G. (Hrsg.): Energiepolitik. Berlin: Springer, 473–486.

    Google Scholar 

  265. Nitsch, J. (2002): Potenziale der Wasserstoffwirtschaft. Externes Gutachten für den WBGU: Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  266. Nordhaus, W. D. und Boyer, J. (2000): Warming the World. Economic Models of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  267. Odell, P. (2001): Book Review. Energy Policy 29, 943–944.

    Google Scholar 

  268. Odum, E. P. (1969): The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164, 262–270.

    Google Scholar 

  269. OECD — Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Hrsg.) (2000): Synthesis Report of the OECD Project on Environmentally Sustainable Development (EST). Internet: http://www.oecd.org/env/ccst/est/estproj/estproj1. htm. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  270. OECD — Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Hrsg.) (2001): Development Co-operation: 2000 Report: Efforts and Policies of the Development Assistance Committee. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  271. OECD — Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Hrsg.) (2002): Entwicklungszusammenarbeit. Bericht 2001. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  272. Öko-Institut und DIW — Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (2001): Analyse und Vergleich der flexiblen Instrumente des Kioto-Protokolls. Externe Expertise der Enquete-Kommission „Nachhaltige Energieversorgung unter den Bedingungen der Globalisierung und der Liberalisierung“. Berlin: Öko-Institut und DIW.

    Google Scholar 

  273. OPEC — Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (Hrsg.) (2001): Annual Statistical Bulletin 2000. Genf: OPEC.

    Google Scholar 

  274. OTA — Office of Technology Assessment (Hrsg.) (1991): Energy in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: Congress of the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  275. Ott, B. (2002): Vorlesungsbegleitende Unterlagen für Technik im Sachunterricht der Primärstufe SS 2002. Dortmund: Universität Dortmund. Lehrstuhl Technik und ihre Didaktik I.

    Google Scholar 

  276. Paine, L. K., Peterson, T. L., Undersander, D. J., Rineer, K. C., Bartlet, G. A.,Temple, S.A., Sample, D.W. und Klemme, R. M. (1996): Some ecological and socio-economic considerations for biomass energy crop production. Biomass and Bioenergy 10, 131–242.

    Google Scholar 

  277. Parson, E. A. und Keith, D. W. (1998): Fossil fuels without CO2 emissions. Science 282, 1053–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  278. Pearce, F. (1992): The Damned. Rivers, Dams and the Coming World Water Crisis. London: Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  279. Pehnt, M. (2002): Ganzheitliche Bilanzierung von Brennstoffzellen in der Energie- und Verkehrstechnik. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, Reihe 6: Energietechnik, Nr. 476. Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  280. Pehnt, M., Bubenzer, A. und Räuber, A. (2003): Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic systems 1. Trying to fight deep-seated prejudices. In: Bubenzer, A. und Luther, J. (Hrsg.): Photovoltaics Guidebook for Decision Makers. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokio: Springer, 179–214.

    Google Scholar 

  281. Percy, K. E., Awmack, C. S., Lindroth, R. L., Kubiske, M. E., Kopper, B. J., Isebrands, J. G., Pregitzer, K. S., Hendrey, G. R., Dickson, R. E., Zak, D. R., Oksanen, E., Sober, J., Harrington, R. und Karnosky, D. F. (2002): Altered performance of forest pests under atmospheres enriched by CO2and O3. Nature 420, 403–407.

    Google Scholar 

  282. Petschel-Held, G., Block, A., Cassel-Gintz, M., Kropp, J., Luedeke, M. K. B., Moldenhauer, O., Reusswig, F. und Schellnhuber, H. J. (1999): Syndromes of Global Change: a qualitative modelling approach to assist global environmental management. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 4, 295–314.

    Google Scholar 

  283. Petsonk, A. (1999): The Kyoto Protocol and the WTO: Integrating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Allowance Trading into the Global Marketplace. Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum 10, 185–220.

    Google Scholar 

  284. Philips, M. und Browne, B. H. (o.X): Accelerating PV Markets in Developing Countries. Internet: http://www. repp.org/repp_pubs/articles/pv/7/7.html. Washington, DC: Renewable Energy Policy Project.

  285. Ploetz, C. (2002): Sequestrierung von CO2-Technologien, Potenziale, Kosten und Umweltauswirkungen. Externes Gutachten für den WBGU: Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  286. Quaschning, V. (2000): Systemtechnik einer klimaverträglichen Elektrizitätsversorgung in Deutschland für das 21. Jahrhundert. Fortschritt-Bericht VDI. Reihe 6: Energietechnik. Düsseldorf : VDI Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  287. Raeder, J., Cook, I., Morgenstern, F. H., Salpietro, E., Bunde, R. und Ebert, E. (1995): Safety and Environmental Assessment of Fusion Power (SEAFP). Brüssel: European Commission DG XII.

    Google Scholar 

  288. Ramsey, F. P. (1928): A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal 38, 543–559.

    Google Scholar 

  289. Raphals, P. (2001): Restructured Rivers: Hydropower in the Era of Competitive Markets. Berkeley: International Rivers Network (IRN).

    Google Scholar 

  290. RECS — Renewable Energy Certificate System (2002): Renewable Energy Certification System. Internet: http://www.recs.org. Rotterdam: RECS.

    Google Scholar 

  291. Reddy, A. K. N. (2002): Energy technologies and policies for rural development. In: Goldemberg, T. B. (Hrsg.): Energy for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  292. Reichle, D., Houghton, J., Kane, B. und Ekmann, J. (1999): Carbon Sequestration Research and Development. Internet: http://www.ornl.gov/carbon_sequestration/. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).

    Google Scholar 

  293. Reusswig, F. (1994): Lebensstile und Ökologie. Frankfurt: Institut für sozial-ökologische Forschung.

    Google Scholar 

  294. Reusswig, F., Gerlinger, K. und Edenhofer, O. (2002): Lebensstile und globaler Energieverbrauch. Analyse und Strategieansätze zu einer nachhaltigen Energiestruktur. Externes Gutachten für den WBGU. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  295. Revenga, G., Murray, S., Abramovitz, J. und Hammond, A. (1998): Watersheds of the World: Ecological Value and Vulnerability. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute und Worldwatch Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  296. Riahi, K. und Roehrl, R. A. (2000): Greenhouse gas emissions in a dynamics-as-usual scenario of economic and energy eve-lopment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 63, 175–205.

    Google Scholar 

  297. Riahi, K. (2002): Data From Model Runs With Message. Externes Gutachten für den WBGU: Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  298. Roehrl, R. A. und Riahi, K. (2000): Technology dynamics and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation: a cost assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 63, 231–261.

    Google Scholar 

  299. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (Hrsg.) (2000): Energy — The Changing Climate. Twenty-second Report. London: Royal Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  300. Ruttan, V. (2000): Technology, Growth and Development: An Induced Innovation Perspective. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  301. Salameh, M. G. (2000): Global oil outlook: return to the absence of surplus and its implications. Applied Energy 65, 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  302. Sanderson, M. A., Reed, R. L., Mclaughlin, R. B., Conger, B. V., Parrish, D.J., Taliaferro, C., Hopkins, A.A., Ocumpaugh, W. R. und Tischler, C. R. (1996): Switchgrass as a sustainable bio-energy crop. Bioresource Technology 56, 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  303. Sankovski, A., Barbour, W. und Pepper, W. (2000): Quantification of the IS99 emission scenario storylines using the atmospheric stabilization framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 63, 263–287.

    Google Scholar 

  304. Sanstad, A. H. (2002): Information Technology and Aggregate Energy Use in the U.S.: Empirical and Theoretical Issues. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA. IEA Workshop on Impact of Information & Communication Technologies on the Energy System, Paris, France, February 21, 2002. Internet:http://www.iea.org/effi/index.htm. Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA).

    Google Scholar 

  305. Schellnhuber, H. J. (1998): Earth system analysis: The scope of the challenge. In: Schellnhuber, H. J. und Wenzel, V. (Hrsg.): Earth System Analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokio: Springer, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  306. Schneider, L. C., Kinzig, A. P., Larson, E. D. und Solorzano, L. A. (2001): Method for spatially explicit calculations of potential biomass yields and assessment of land availability for bio-mass energy production in Northeastern Brazil. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 84, 207–226.

    Google Scholar 

  307. Scholz, F. (2002): Energiesicherung oder neue politisch-globale Strategie? Vorder- und Mittelasien im Brennpunkt der US-Interessen. Geographische Rundschau 54 (12), 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  308. Schulze, E.-D., Lloyd, J., Kelliher, F. M., Wirth, G., Rebmann, G., Lühker, B., Mund, M., Knohl, A., Milyukova, I. M., Schulze, W., Dore, S., Grigoriev, S., Kolle, O., Panfyorov, M., Tchebakova, N. und Vygodskaya, N. N. (1999): Productivity of forests in the Eurosiberian boreal region and their potential to act as a carbon sink — a synthesis. Global Change Biology 5, 703–722.

    Google Scholar 

  309. Schulze, E.-D., Valentini, R. und Sanz, M.-J. (2002): The long way from Kyoto to Marrakesh: Implications of the Kyoto Protocol negotiations for global ecology. Global Change Biology 8, 505–518.

    Google Scholar 

  310. Schulze, E.-D. (2002): Die Bedeutung der naturnahen Forstwirtschaft für den globalen CO2-Haushalt. AFZ — Der Wald 20, 1051–1053.

    Google Scholar 

  311. Scott, M. J., Sands, R. D., Rosenberg, N. J. und Izaurralde, N. G. (2002): Future N2O from US agriculture: projecting effects of changing land use, agricultural technology, and climate on N2O emissions. Global Environmental Change 12, 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  312. Seibel, B. A. und Walsh, P. J. (2001): Potential impacts of CO2injection on deep-sea biota. Science 294, 319–320.

    Google Scholar 

  313. Smith, K. S., Corvalan, C. F. und Kjellström, T. (1999): How much global ill health is attributable to environmental factors? Epidemiology 10 (5), 573–584.

    Google Scholar 

  314. Smith, K. R., Samet, J. M., Romieu, I. und Bruce, N. (2000): Indoor air pollution in developing countries and acute lower respiratory infections in children. Thorax 55, 518–532.

    Google Scholar 

  315. Smith, K. R. (2000): National burden of disease in India from indoor air pollution. PNAS 97 (24), 13286–13293.

    Google Scholar 

  316. Smith, K. R. (2002): In Praise of Petroleum? Science 298, 1847.

    Google Scholar 

  317. Snedacker, S. G. (1984): Mangroves: a summary of knowledge with emphasis on Pakistan. In: Haq, B. U. und Milliman, J. D. (Hrsg.): Marine Geology and Oceanography of Arabian Sea and Coastal Pakistan. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 99.

    Google Scholar 

  318. Spreng, D. und Semadeni, M. (2001): Energie, Umwelt und die 2000 Watt Gesellschaft. Zürich: Centre for Energy Policy and Economics (cepe).

    Google Scholar 

  319. SRU — Rat von Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen (Hrsg.) (1994): Umweltgutachten 1994. Für eine dauerhaft umwelt-gerechte Entwicklung. Wiesbaden: SRU.

    Google Scholar 

  320. SRU — Rat von Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen (Hrsg.) (2002): Umweltgutachten 2002. Für eine neue Vorreiterrolle. Berlin: SRU.

    Google Scholar 

  321. SRW — Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (1998): Vor weit reichenden Entscheidungen. Stuttgart, Mainz: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  322. Stahel, W. R. (1997): The service economy: wealth without resource consumption? Philos T Roy Soc A (355), 1386–1388.

    Google Scholar 

  323. Stanley, D. G. und Warne, A. G. (1993): Nile Delta: recent geological evolution and human impact. Science 260, 628–634.

    Google Scholar 

  324. Statistisches Bundesamt (2002): Statistisches Jahrbuch 2002 für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  325. Stucki, S., Palumbo, R., Baltensperger, U, Boulouchos, K., Haas, O., Scherer, G. G., Siegwolf, R. und Wokaun, A. (2002): The Role of Chemical Processes in the Transition to Sustainable Energy Systems. Villingen, Schweiz: Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI).

    Google Scholar 

  326. Stüwe, M. (1993): Sonnige Zukunft: Energieversorgung jenseits von Öl und Uran. Amsterdam: Greenpeace International.

    Google Scholar 

  327. Subedi, S. P. (1998): Foreign investment and sustainable development. In: Weiss, F. (Hrsg.): International Economic Law With a Human Face. Den Haag: Kluwer Law International, 413–428.

    Google Scholar 

  328. Svensson, B. (1999): Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydroelectric Reservoirs — The Need of a Appraisal. Presentation Given at the COP-6 Meeting of the UNFCCC in The Hague, The Netherlands. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript. Stockholm: SwedPower AB.

    Google Scholar 

  329. Swiss Re (2001): Natural Catastrophes and Man-made Disasters in 2000: Fewer Insured Losses Despite Huge Floods. Internet: http://www.swissre.ch. Zürich: Swiss Re.

    Google Scholar 

  330. Tahvanainen, L. und Rytkönen, V.-M. (1999): Biomass production of Salix viminalisin southern Finland and the effect of soil properties and climate conditions on its production and survival. Biomass and Bioenergy 16, 103–117.

    Google Scholar 

  331. Tamburri, M. N., Peltzer, E. T., Friederich, G. E., Aya, I., Yamane, K. und Brewer, P. (2000): A field study of the effects of CO2ocean disposal on mobile deep-sea animals. Marine Chemistry 72, 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  332. Terivision (2002): Integrated Energy Solutions for Rural Families. Internet: http://www.teriin.org/news/terivsn/issue6/spe-crep.htm. New Delhi: Data Energy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  333. Thuille, A., Buchmann, N. und Schulze, E.-D. (2000): Carbon stocks and soil respiration rates during deforestation, grassland use and subsequent Norway spruce afforestation in the Southern Alps, Italy. Tree Physiology 20, 849–857.

    Google Scholar 

  334. Tol, R. S. J. und Verheyen, R. (2001): Liability and Compensation for Climate Change Damages — A Legal and Economic Assessment. Internet: http://www.uni-hamburg.de/Wiss/ FB/15/Sustainability/Liability.pdf. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  335. Torp, T. A. (Hrsg.) (2000): Final Report „Saline Aquifer CO2Storage“ Project (SACS). Bergen: Statoil.

    Google Scholar 

  336. Toth, F. L., Bruckner, T., Füßel, H. M., Leimbach, M., Petschel-Held, G. und Schellnhuber, H. J. (1997): The tolerable window approach to integrated assessments. In: CGER — Center for Global Environmental Research (Hrsg.): Climate Change and Integrated Assessment Models — Bridging the Gap. Iba-raki, Tokio: CGER, 403–430.

    Google Scholar 

  337. UBA — Umweltbundesamt (Hrsg.) (1996): Manual on Methodologies and Criteria for Mapping Critical Levels/ Loads and Geographical Areas Where They are Exceeded. UN/ ECE Convention on Long- range Transboundary Air Pollution. UBA Texte 71/96. Berlin: UBA.

    Google Scholar 

  338. UBA — Umweltbundesamt (Hrsg.) (1997): Nachhaltiges Deutschland — Wege zu einer dauerhaft umweltgerechten Entwicklung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.

    Google Scholar 

  339. UN — United Nations (1997): Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly for the Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21. United Nations General Assembly, Nineteenth Special Session, New York, 23–27 June 1997. Internet: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/enrl.htm. New York: United Nations (UN).

    Google Scholar 

  340. UN-Ad Hoc Inter-Agency Task Force on Energy (2001): Briefing Paper on Energy Activities of the United Nations. Internet: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/csd9/briefing_iaenr.pdf. New York: United Nations (UN).

    Google Scholar 

  341. UNCTAD — United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2000): Trade Agreements, Petroleum and Energy Policies. New York, Genf: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  342. UNCTAD — United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2001): Energy Services in International Trade: Development Implications. A Note by the Secretariat. Genf: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  343. UNCTAD — United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2002): World Investment Report 2002. Transnational Corporations and Export Competitiveness. New York, Genf: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  344. UNDP — United Nations Development Programme (Hrsg.) (1997): Energy After Rio. Prospects and Challenges. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  345. UNDP — United Nations Development Programme (Hrsg.) (2002a): Human Development Report 2002. Deepening Democracy in a Fragmented World. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  346. UNDP — United Nations Development Programme (2002b): Weltbevölkerungsbericht. Wege aus der Armut: Menschen, Chancen und Entwicklung. New York: UNDP

    Google Scholar 

  347. UNDP — United Nations Development Programme, UN-DESA — United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs und WEC — World Energy Council (Hrsg.) (2000): World Energy Assessment. Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  348. UNEP — United Nations Environment Programme und IEA -International Energy Agency (2001): Energy Subsidy Reform and Sustainable Development: Challenges for Policymakers. Synthesis Report. Internet: http://www.iea.org/workshop/sus-tain/. Paris: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  349. UNEP — United Nations Environment Programme (2002): Global Environmental Outlook. Internet: http://www.unep. org/geo/geo3/english/index.htm. New York: UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  350. UN-ECE — United Nations Economic Commission for Europe und FAO — Food and Agricultural Organisation (2000): Forest Resources of Europe, CIS, North America, Australia, Japan and New Zealand. New York, Genf, Rom: UN-ECE und FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  351. UN-ECE — United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2001): Energy Efficiency and Energy Security in the CIS. ECE Energy Series No. 17 (Dokument ECE/ENERGY/44). Internet: http://www.unece.org/energy/nrghome.html. New York, Genf: United Nations (UN).

    Google Scholar 

  352. UN-ECOSOC — United Nations Economic and Social Council (2001): Commission on Sustainable Development: Report on the Ninth Session. Internet: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/csd9/ecnl72001–19e.htm#Decision%209/l. New York: United Nations (UN).

    Google Scholar 

  353. UNEP-CCEE — United Nations Environment Programm Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment (2002): Implementation of Renewable Energy Technology — Opportunities and Barriers. Internet: http://www.uccee. org/RETs/SummaryCountryStudies.pdf. New York: UNEP-CCEE.

    Google Scholar 

  354. UNESCO — United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (2001): World Solar Programme 1996–2005. Internet: http://www.unesco.org/science/wsp/background/ full_report.htm#action. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  355. UNFCCC — United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2002): Report on the Conference of the Parties on Its Seventh session, Held at Marrakesh from 29 October to 10 November 2001, FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.l, 21. Januar 2002. UNFCCC.

    Google Scholar 

  356. US-DOE — U.S. Department of Energy (1999): Carbon Sequestration — Research and Development. Internet: http://www.fe.doe.gov/coal_power/sequestration/reports/rd/index.s html. Springfield, VA: DOE.

    Google Scholar 

  357. US-DOE — U.S. Department of Energy (2002): World Production of Primary Energy by Selected Country Groups (Btu), 1991–2000. Internet: http://www.eia.doe. gov/emeu/iea /table29.html. Washington, DC: DOE.

    Google Scholar 

  358. Van Beers, C. und de Moor, A. (2001): Public Subsidies and Policy Failures: How Subsidies Distort the Natural Environment, Equity and Trade, and How to Reform Them. Cheltenham, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  359. Van Vurren, D. und Bakkes, J. (1999): GEO-2000 Alternative Policy Study for Europe and Central Asia — Energy-related environmental impacts of policy scenarios, 1990–2010. Nairobi, Bilthoven: UNEP und RIVM.

    Google Scholar 

  360. Varma, C. V. J., Lafitte, R. und Schultz, B. (2000): Open Letter from ICOLD, IHA and ICID on the Final Report of the World Commission on Dams. Internet: http://www.unep-dams.org/print.php?doc_id=68. Paris, Sutton, New Delhi: International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD), International Hydropower Association (IHA) und International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage (IHA).

    Google Scholar 

  361. VENRO -Verband Entwicklungspolitik deutscher Nichtregierungsorganisationen (2001): Armut bekämpfen — Gerechtigkeit schaffen. Folgerungen aus der internationalen und nationalen Debatte über Armutsbekämpfung für die deutsche Entwicklungspolitik. Bonn: VENRO.

    Google Scholar 

  362. Vesterdal, L., Ritter, E. und Gundersen, P. (2002): Change in soil organic carbon following afforestation of former arable land. Forest Ecology and Management 169, 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  363. Von Bieberstein Koch-Weser, M. (2002): Nachhaltigkeit von Wasserkraft. Externes Gutachten für den WBGU: Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  364. Von Hirschhausen, C. und Engerer, H. (1998): Post-Soviet gas sector restructuring in the CIS: a political economy approach. Energy Policy 26, 1113–1123.

    Google Scholar 

  365. Waelde, T., Bamberger, C. und Linehan, J. (2000): The Energy Charter Treaty in 2000 (2000): In A New Phase. CEPMLP-Journal 7–1. Internet: http://www.dundee.ac.uk/ecpmlp/jour-nal/html/article7-l.html. Dundee: University of Dundee.

    Google Scholar 

  366. Wancura, H., Keukeleere, D. und Jensen, P. (2001): Reaching the EC Alternative Fuels Objectives — A Multi-Path Mapping Analysis European Alternative Fuel Policy Status and Outlook.Internet: http://www.enigmatic-network.org/scree-ning_workshop_paper_vL4.pdf. Brüssel: Enigmatic Network.

    Google Scholar 

  367. Watson, A. J., Bakker, D. C. E., Ridgwell, A. J., Boyd, P. W. und Law, C. S. (2000): Effect of iron supply on Southern Ocean CO2uptake and implications for glacial atmospheric CO2. Nature 407, 730–733.

    Google Scholar 

  368. WBCSD — World Business Council on Sustainable Development (2001): Mobility 2001. World Mobility at the End of the Twentieth Century and its Sustainability. Internet: http://www.wbcsdmobility.org. Genf: WBCSD.

    Google Scholar 

  369. WBGU -Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (1995): Szenario zur Ableitung globaler CO2-Reduktionsziele und Umsetzungsstrategien. Stellungnahme zur 1. Vertragsstaatenkonferenz der Klimarahmenkonvention in Berlin. Sondergutachten 1995. Bremerhaven: WBGU.

    Google Scholar 

  370. WBGU -Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (1996): Welt im Wandel: Herausforderung für die deutsche Wissenschaft. Hauptgutachten 1996. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokio: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  371. WBGU -Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (1997): Ziele für den Klimaschutz 1997. Stellungnahme zur dritten Vertragsstaatenkonferenz der Klimarahmenkonvention in Kyoto. Sondergutachten 1997. Bremerhaven: WBGU.

    Google Scholar 

  372. WBGU -Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (1999): Welt im Wandel: Strategien zur Bewältigung globaler Umweltrisiken. Hauptgutachten 1998. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokio: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  373. WBGU -Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (2000): Welt im Wandel: Erhaltung und nachhaltige Nutzung der Biosphäre. Hauptgutachten 1999. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokio: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  374. WBGU -Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (2001a): Welt im Wandel: Neue Strukturen globaler Umweltpolitik. Hauptgutachten 2000. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokio: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  375. WBGU -Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (2001b): Die Chance von Johannesburg: Eckpunkte einer Verhandlungsstrategie. Politikpapier 1. Berlin: WBGU.

    Google Scholar 

  376. WBGU -Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (2002): Entgelte für die Nutzung globaler Gemeinschaftsgüter. Sondergutachten 2002. Berlin: WBGU.

    Google Scholar 

  377. WCD — World Commission on Dams (2000): Dams and Development. A New Framework for Decision-Making. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  378. WEC — World Energy Council (2000): Energy for Tomorrow’s World — Acting Now! Internet: http://www.worldenergy.org/wecgeis/publications/reports/etwan/exec_summary/exec_summary.asp. London: WEC.

    Google Scholar 

  379. WEED -World Economy Ecology and Development (2002a): Stärkung von Umweltschutz bei Auslandsdirektinvestitionen. Kompromisspapier des vom BMU initiierten Dialogprozesses „Umwelt und Auslandsdirektinvestitionen“ vom 23.05.2002. Internet: http://www.weedbonn.org/unreform/bdidialog.htm. Bonn: WEED.

    Google Scholar 

  380. WEED -World Economy Ecology and Development (2002b): Leitlinien zur Nachhaltigkeit von Auslandsdirektinvestitionen der deutschen Wirtschaft, WEED-Entwurf vom Januar 2002. Internet: http://www.weedbonn.org/unreform/bdidia-log.htm. Bonn: WEED.

    Google Scholar 

  381. Werksmann, J. (2001): Greenhouse-gas emissions trading and the WTO. In: Chambers, W. B. (Hrsg.): Inter-linkages. The Kyoto-Protocol and the International Trade and Investment Regimes. Tokio, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, 153–190.

    Google Scholar 

  382. WHO -World Health Organization (Hrsg.) (1999): Air Quality Guidelines. Genf: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  383. WHO -World Health Organization (Hrsg.) (2000): Air Pollution. Fact Sheet N 187. Genf: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  384. WHO — World Health Organization (Hrsg.) (2002a): An Anthology on Women, Health and Environment: Domestic Fuel Shortage and Indoor Pollution. Genf: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  385. WHO — World Health Organization (Hrsg.) (2002b): World Health Report 2002. Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life. Genf: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  386. WHO -World Health Organization (2002c): Women’s Health and the Environment. Internet: http://w3.whosea.org/women2/environment.htm. Genf: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  387. Wiemken, E., Beyer, H., Heydenreich, G. W. und Kiefer, K. (2001): Power characteristics of PV ensembles: experiences from the combined power production of 100 grid connected PV systems distributed over the area of Germany. Solar Energy 70 (6), 513–518.

    Google Scholar 

  388. Williams, R. (2000): Advanced Energy Supply Technologies. Chapter 8 in World Energy Assessment. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  389. Winter, C. J. und Nitsch, J. (1989): Wasserstoff als Energieträger. Technik, Systeme, Wirtschaft. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokio: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  390. WISE — World Information Service on Energy (2001): Mögliche Toxische Auswirkungen der Wiederaufbereitungsanlagen in Sellafield und La Hague. Paris: WISE.

    Google Scholar 

  391. Wiser, G. M. (1999): The Clean Development Mechanism Versus the World Trade Organization: Can Free-Market Greenhouse Gas Emissions Abatement Survive Free Trade? Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 11 (3), 531–597.

    Google Scholar 

  392. Wissenschaftlicher Beirat beim Bundesministerium der Finanzen (1997): Umweltsteuern aus finanzwissenschaftlicher Sicht. Schriftenreihe des BMF Heft 63. Bonn: Stollfuß.

    Google Scholar 

  393. World Bank (1991): Environmental Assessment Sourcebook. Band III. Guidelines for Environmental Assessment of Energy and Industry Projects. Washington, DC: World Bank Environmental Department.

    Google Scholar 

  394. World Bank (1993): The World Bank’s Role in the Electric Power Sector: Policies for Effective Institutional, Regulatory and Financial Reform. World Bank Policy Paper. Internet: http://www.worldbank.org/energy/subenergy/policy_papers. htm. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  395. World Bank (2000): Energy Services for the World’s Poor. Energy and Development Report 2000. Internet: http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/esmap/energy_report 2000/. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  396. World Bank (2001a): Reforming India’s Energy Sector (1978–99). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  397. World Bank (2001b): Topical Briefing to the Board of Directors on Energy. The World Bank Group’s Energy Program. Poverty Alleviation, Sustainability, and Selectivity. Internet: http://www.worldbank.org/energy/pdfs/business_renewal.pdfWashington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  398. World Bank (2001c): World Development Indicators 2001. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  399. World Bank (2002a): World Development Indicators 2002. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  400. World Bank (2002b): Global Development Finance. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  401. World Bank (2002c): Energy and the Environment. Energy and Development Report 2001. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  402. World Tourism Organization (2002): Latest Data. Internet: http://www.world-tourism.org/market_research/facts&figu-res/menu.htm. Madrid: World Tourism Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  403. WRI — World Resource Institute (2001): World Resources 2000–2001. Washington, DC: WRI.

    Google Scholar 

  404. WRI -World Resource Institute (2002): Energy Consumption by Economic Sector, Table ERC3. Internet: http://earth trends.wri.org/.Washington, DC: WRI.

    Google Scholar 

  405. WRI — World Resources Institute, UNEP — United Nations Environment Programme und WBCSD — World Business Council for Sustainable Development (Hrsg.) (2002): Tomorrow’s Markets. Global Trends and Their Implications for Business. Washington, DC: WRI, UNEP, WBCSD.

    Google Scholar 

  406. WTO — World Trade Organisation/Council for Trade in Services (1998): Energy Services — Background Note by the Secretariat (S/C/W/52) vom 9. September 1998. Internet: http://www.docsonline.wto.org/gen_search.asp. Genf: WTO.

    Google Scholar 

  407. WTO — World Trade Organisation (2001): International Trade Statistics 2001. Genf: WTO.

    Google Scholar 

  408. Zan, C. S., Fyles, J. W., Girouard, P. und Samson, R. A. (2001): Carbon sequestration in perennial bioenergy, annual corn and uncultivated systems in southern Quebec. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 86, 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  409. Zittel, W. und Altmann, M. (1996): Molecular Hydrogen and Water Vapour Emissions in a Global Hydrogen Energy Economy. Proceedings 11th World Hydrogen Energy Conference. Internet: http://www.hydrogen.org/Wissen/Vapour. htm. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (WBGU). (2003). Literatur. In: Welt im Wandel: Energiewende zur Nachhaltigkeit. Mitglieder des Wissenschaftlichen Beirats der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55861-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55861-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-52301-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55861-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics