Skip to main content
  • 2507 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter continues the description of DBS constructs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The gender specification in the singular is needed for agreement with a possible coreferential pronoun.

  2. 2.

    The function words the, has, a, and a in the surface of 23.1.2 are absorbed into the associated content word proplets and represented as certain values such as def(inite). In as much as the girl, for example, is regarded as phrasal at the surface level, but as elementary at the corresponding content level, the notion ‘phrasal’ is used differently at the two levels.

  3. 3.

    For the corresponding treatment of adnominal subclauses, aka relative clauses, see CLaTR, Sect. 9.3.

  4. 4.

    In DBS, recognition, reasoning, and action do not require a language ability. However, natural agents without language must be capable of nonlanguage communication at least to the degree that reproduction is ensured.

References

  • Elmasri, R., and S.B. Navathe (2010) Fundamentals of Database Systems, 6th edn. Redwood City: Benjamin-Cummings

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Exercises

Exercises

Section 23.1

  1. 1.

    Give an example of an elementary and a phrasal noun, adj, and verb.

  2. 2.

    Name the clausal relations of natural language.

  3. 3.

    Why are the clausal relations opaque?

  4. 4.

    Explain the relation between the sentential subject and the matrix verb in 23.1.3. Describe the relevant attributes and values.

  5. 5.

    Define a corresponding proplet set for a sentential object construction.

  6. 6.

    Define a corresponding proplet set for a sentential adverb construction.

Section 23.2

  1. 1.

    Compare a classic network database and a word bank.

  2. 2.

    What is the primary key for storage and retrieval in a word bank?

  3. 3.

    What is the difference between an owner proplet and a member proplet?

  4. 4.

    What is the storage location for a new proplet?

  5. 5.

    Explain the core and the continuation attributes in a proplet.

  6. 6.

    Why are the proplets of a proposition stored in different token lines?

  7. 7.

    How does a content navigation use the retrieval mechanism of the word bank?

Section 23.3

  1. 1.

    Explain how the semantic relations subject-predicate, object-predicate, adnominal-noun, adverbial-verb, and conjunct-conjunct are represented in an SRG.

  2. 2.

    Compare an SRG and a corresponding signature.

  3. 3.

    How are coreferential pronouns represented in a signature?

  4. 4.

    Are NAGs defined for the speak mode or for the hear mode?

  5. 5.

    Explain surface realizations in which a surface requires more than one traversal step and in which one traversal step realizes more than one surface.

  6. 6.

    How are paratactic and hypotactic constructions represented in an SRG?

  7. 7.

    Explain why systems based on the principle of possible substitution cannot define relations between content words directly.

Section 23.4

  1. 1.

    Explain the two reasons why a propositional content may have alternative surfaces.

  2. 2.

    In what sense is a mapping between alternative surfaces and a propositional content in the same language analogous to a mapping between a given content and equivalent surfaces in different languages?

  3. 3.

    Describe the tasks of the mapping between a content and a surface in the speak and in the hear mode.

  4. 4.

    What are the respective advantages and disadvantages of postulating a universal representation of a propositional content, within a language and across languages.

  5. 5.

    What relations allow the construction of contents which are unlimited in size?

Section 23.5

  1. 1.

    Describe the ten Slim states of cognition.

  2. 2.

    What are the three possible activation points of a Slim machine?

  3. 3.

    Compare the Slim states of language-based and context-based cognition.

  4. 4.

    Compare the Slim states of immediate and mediated reference.

  5. 5.

    How do the speak and the hear mode differ in a Slim machine?

  6. 6.

    Why is immediate reference a special case of mediated reference?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hausser, R. (2014). Semantic Relations of Structure. In: Foundations of Computational Linguistics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41431-2_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41431-2_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41430-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41431-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics