Skip to main content

Methods to Prevent or Mitigate Accidents with Large Animals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Characterization and Development of Biosystems and Biomaterials

Abstract

Although accidents with animals represent a small portion in the official statistics, these accidents have an economic effect. The regulatory costs in Germany added up to an average of 370–464 million Euros annually in the years between 2000 and 2005. The insurance companies registered between 210,000 and 235,000 deer accidents on average every year. The largest part of the data collected by the insurance companies is accidents with damage to property. But accidents with large animals are a danger to vehicle occupants. German statistics for accidents with animals for this period show between 18 and 28 fatally injured persons and between 580 and 750 severely injured and 2,100–2,600 light casualties every year. Accidents that are caused by evasive maneuvers causing running-off track and finally colliding with the infrastructure or causing a cross-over collision have not been taken into account. The aim of this investigation is to evaluate typical accident scenarios and accident simulation with large animals. In particular, the effects on the vehicle occupants are investigated by multi-body simulation methods. The occupant load for accidents with animals is determined and influencing factors on the load are derived. Based on these investigations, avoidability scenarios are developed and methods are introduced that are relevant to the vehicle (active and passive safety) and also to the infrastructure and the driver. The objective is to develop effective counteractions in order to avoid accidents with animals or at least mitigate the accident aftermath.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bruinderink, G., Hazebroek, E.: Ungulate traffic collisions in Europe. Conserv. Biol. 10, 1059–1067 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brockmann, S.: Wildunfälle, Untersuchungsgebiet Oberbergischer Kreis NRW. Unfallforschung der Versicherer, GDV, Presseforum 25 April (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Björnstig, U., Eriksson, A., Thorson, J., Bylund, P.O.: Collisions with passenger cars and moose. Am. J. Public Health 76(4), 460–462 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sullivan, J.M.:Relationship between lighting and animal-vehicle collisions. University of Michigan, Transport Research Institute; Report No. UMTRI-2009-35, Oct (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hedlund, J.H., Curtis, P.D., Curtis, G., Williams, A.F.: Methods to reduce traffic crashes involving deer: what works and what does not. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Oct (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ansari, S.A., Ashraff, A.K.S.M.: Camel collision as a major cause of low cervical spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 36, 415–417 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Ghamdi, A.S., AlGadhi, S.A.: Warning signs as countermeasures to camel-vehicle collisions in Saudi Arabia. Accid. Anal. Prev. 36, 749–760 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Attewell, R., Glase, K.: Bull bars and road trauma. Road Safety Report CR200, Department of Transport and Regional Services, Australian Transport Safety Bureau, Dec (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. DSD: PC-Crash Manual, Linz (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Europäische Kommission—Generaldirektion Wettbewerb. Kraftfahrzeugvertrieb und -Kundendienst in der Europäischen Union. Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1400/2002 der Kommission vom 31. July (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. http://media.news.de/resources/thumbs/58/d3/6358735260f58f19485d4d8d0912.jpg

  12. http://kenai.fws.gov/overview/notebook/images/moose_collision_with_car.JPG

  13. Winner, H., et al.: Handbuch fahrerassistenzsysteme, vieweg + teubner. GWV Fachverlag GmbH, Wiesbaden (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. TNO: By the Way. Sept (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huijser, M.P., McGowen, P., Fuller, J., Hardy, A., Kociolek, A., Clevenger, A.P., Smith, D., Ament, R.: Wildlife-vehicle collision reduction study: report to congress. U.S. Department of Transport, Federal Highway administration, Report No. FHWA-HRT-08-034 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reed, D.F.: Effectiveness of highway lighting in reducing deer-vehicle accidents. J. Wildl. Manage. 45, 721–726 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Sinz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Name

Scientific name

Distribution

Length of head and torso

Shoulder height

Weight

  

Cow

Bos primigenius taurus

World wide

1.6–3.0

1.2–1.5

500–1,200

Scott Bauer (US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service).

Horse

Equus ferus caballus

World wide

2.0–3.0

1.0–1.6

175–450

Vulkano

Wild boar

Sus scrofa

World wide

1.3–1.8

0.8–1.0

70–200

Richard Bartz, Munich Makro Freak

Stag

  

0.7–2.9

0.3–1.9

7–800

  

(white-tailed deer)

Odocoileus virginianus

North America

 

1.0–1.1

100–150

Scott Bauer, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

Red deer

Cervus elaphus

Europe

1.80–2.10

 

100–168

Heinz Seehagel

Wapiti

Cervus canadensis

North America, Eastern Asia

 

0.75–1.50

230–450

Jim Leupold and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Elk

Alces alces

Eurasia, North America

3.00

2.3

800

 

Fallow deer

Dama dama

Central Southern Europe Middle East

1.30–1.75

0.8–1.05

65–110

Wisnia6522

Deer

Capreolus capreolus

Central Europe

1.00–1.40

0.6–0.9

15–30

 

Reindeer

Rangifer tarandus

Eurasia, North America

1.20–2.20

0.9–1.40

60–300

Alexandre Buisse

Camels

Camelidae

   

300–700

  

Dromedary (Arabic camel)

Camelus dromedarius

Asia, Africa

2.3–3.4

1.80–2.30

300–700

Daderot

Bactrian camel

Camelus (ferus) bactrianus

Asia

2.5–3.0

1.80–2.30

450–900

BS Thurner Hof

New-world camels

Lama

      

Guanako

Lama guanicoe

South America

1.2–1.7

0.9–1.2

80–120

PowersPhotos

Lama

Lama glama

South America

 

1.1–1.3

120–150

Anakin

Alpaka

Lama pacos

South America

 

0.9-1.1

55–70

Russelgz

Vicunga

Vicunga

      

Vicuña

Vicugna vicugna

South America

1.4–1.6

0.9–1.0

55–65

Dodo, L. Haefner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sinz, W. et al. (2013). Methods to Prevent or Mitigate Accidents with Large Animals. In: Öchsner, A., da Silva, L., Altenbach, H. (eds) Characterization and Development of Biosystems and Biomaterials. Advanced Structured Materials, vol 29. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31470-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics