Skip to main content

Expressing Extension-Based Semantics Based on Stratified Minimal Models

  • Conference paper
Logic, Language, Information and Computation (WoLLIC 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5514))

Abstract

Extension-based argumentation semantics is a successful approach for performing non-monotonic reasoning based on argumentation theory. An interesting property of some extension-based argumentation semantics is that these semantics can be characterized in terms of logic programming semantics. In this paper, we present novel results in this topic. In particular, we show that one can induce an argumentation semantics (that we call Stratified Argumentation Semantics) based on a logic programming semantics that is based on stratified minimal models. We show that the stratified argumentation semantics overcome some problems of extension-based argumentation semantics based on admissible sets and we show that it coincides with the argumentation semantics CF2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bang-Jensen, J., Gutin, G.: Digraphs: Theory, Algorithms and Applications, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Guida, G.: SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics. Artificial Intelligence 168, 162–210 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Dunne, P.E.: Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 171(10-15), 619–641 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Carballido, J.L., Nieves, J.C., Osorio, M.: Inferring Preferred Extensions by Pstable Semantics. Iberoamerican Journal of Artificial Intelligence (Inteligencia Artificial) 13(41), 38–53 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dix, J., Müller, M.: Partial evaluation and relevance for approximations of stable semantics. In: Raś, Z.W., Zemankova, M. (eds.) ISMIS 1994. LNCS, vol. 869, pp. 511–520. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321–358 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunne, P.E., Bench-Capon, T.J.: Coherence in finite argument systems. Artificial Intelligence 141(1), 187–203 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gelder, A.V., Ross, K.A., Schlipf, J.S.: The well-founded semantics for general logic programs. Journal of the ACM 38(3), 620–650 (1991)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The Stable Model Semantics for Logic Programming. In: Kowalski, R., Bowen, K. (eds.) 5th Conference on Logic Programming, pp. 1070–1080. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kakas, A.C., Kowalski, R.A., Toni, F.: The role of abduction in logic programming. In: Gabbay, D., Hogger, C.J., Robinson, J.A. (eds.) Handbook in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, vol. 5, pp. 235–324. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kakas, A.C., Mancarella, P.: Generalized stable models: A semantics for abduction. In: ECAI, pp. 385–391 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nieves, J.C.: Modeling arguments and uncertain information — A non-monotonic reasoning approach. PhD thesis, Software Department (LSI), Technical University of Catalonia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nieves, J.C., Osorio, M.: A General Schema For Generating Argumentation Semantics From Logic Programming Semantics. Research Report LSI-08-32-R, Technical University of Catalonia, Software Department, LSI (2008), http://www.lsi.upc.edu/dept/techreps/buscar.php

  14. Nieves, J.C., Osorio, M., Cortés, U.: Preferred Extensions as Stable Models. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 8(4), 527–543 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Nieves, J.C., Osorio, M., Cortés, U., Olmos, I., Gonzalez, J.A.: Defining new argumentation-based semantics by minimal models. In: Seventh Mexican International Conference on Computer Science (ENC 2006), pp. 210–220. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Osorio, M., Navarro, J.A., Arrazola, J.R., Borja, V.: Logics with Common Weak Completions. Journal of Logic and Computation 16(6), 867–890 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.A.W.: Logics for defeasible argumentation. In: Gabbay, D., Günthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edn., vol. 4, pp. 219–318. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nieves, J.C., Osorio, M., Zepeda, C. (2009). Expressing Extension-Based Semantics Based on Stratified Minimal Models. In: Ono, H., Kanazawa, M., de Queiroz, R. (eds) Logic, Language, Information and Computation. WoLLIC 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5514. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02261-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02261-6_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02260-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02261-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics