Skip to main content

Closing the Gap between the Stable Semantics and Extensions of WFS

  • Conference paper
MICAI 2004: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (MICAI 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2972))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In order to really understand all aspects of logic-based program development of different semantics, it would be useful to have a common solid logical foundation. The stable semantics has one already based on intuitionistic logic I and using the notion of completions. Since S4 expresses I then the stable semantics can be fully represented in S4. We propose the same approach to define extensions of the WFS semantics. We distinguish a particular semantics that we call AS-WFS wich is defined over general propositional theories, can be defined via completions using S4. Interesting AS-WFS seems to satisfy most of the principles of a well behaved semantics. Our general goal is to propose S4 and completions to study the formal behavior of different semantics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van Dalen, D.: Intuitionistic Logic Handbook of Philosophical Logic. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.) Alternatives to Classical Logic, vol. III, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrechtz (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brewka, G., Dix, J., Konolige, K.: Non Monotonic Reasoning An Overview. Center for the Study of Languages and Information Stanford California (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnon, A.: On the Expressive Power of the Three-Valued and FOUR-Valued LanguajesLanguages. Journal of Logic and Computation 9 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Denecker, M., Pelov, N., Bruynooghe, M.: Ultimate Well-Founded and Stable Semantics for Logic Programs with Aggregates. In: Codognet, P. (ed.) ICLP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2237, pp. 212–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Dix, J.: A Classification Theory of Semantics of Normal Logic Programs: I. Strong Properties. Fundamental Informaticae XXII 3*, 227–255 (1995)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Dix, J.: A Classification Theory of Semantics of Normal Logic Programs: II. Weak Properties. Fundamental Informaticae XXII 3*, 257–288 (1995)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Dix, J., Osorio, M., Zepeda, C.: A general theory of confluent rewriting systems for logic programming and its applications. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 108(1-3), 153–188 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gelfond, M.: On stratified auto-epistemic theories. In: Proceedings of AAAI 1987, pp. 207–211. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programs. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Logic Programming, pp. 1070–1080. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lifschitz, V., Pearce, D., Valverde, A.: Strongly equivalent logic programs. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 2, 526–541 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. McDermott, D.: Nonmonotonic Logic II: nonmonotonic Modal Theories. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 29(1), 33–57 (1982)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lloyd, J.W.: Foundations of Logic Programming, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Osorio, M., Navarro, J.A., Arrazola, J.: Equivalence in Answer Set Programming. In: Pettorossi, A. (ed.) LOPSTR 2001. LNCS, vol. 2372, pp. 57–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Osorio, M., Navarro, J.A., Arrazola, J.: Applications of Intuitionistic Logic in Answer Set Programming. Accepted in Journal of TPLP (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Osorio, M., Navarro, J.A., Arrazola, J.: A Logical Approach to A-prolog. In: 9th. Workshop on Logic Language and Information, Brazil (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pearce, D.: Stable inference as intuitionistic validity. Logic Programming 38, 79–91 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Schlipf, J.S.: Formalizing a Logic for Logic Programming. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 5, 279–302 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. van Gelder, A., Ross, K.A., Schlipf, J.S.: The well-founded semantics for general logic programs. Journal of the ACM 38, 620–650 (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Osorio, M., Borja, V., Arrazola, J. (2004). Closing the Gap between the Stable Semantics and Extensions of WFS. In: Monroy, R., Arroyo-Figueroa, G., Sucar, L.E., Sossa, H. (eds) MICAI 2004: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. MICAI 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2972. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24694-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24694-7_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21459-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24694-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics