Skip to main content

The Role of Ephemerides from Ptolemy to Kepler

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Science of Time 2016

Part of the book series: Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings ((ASSSP,volume 50))

Abstract

Celestial timekeeping relied in the first instance on the movements of the stars and planets. The principal systematic positions of planets are recorded in ephemerides, which are primarily predictions, not observations. Prior to the invention of printing, ephemerides are extremely rare, which gives lie to the widespread mythology that astronomers before the days of printing were eagerly observing the heavens to add epicycles to improve the accuracy of the tables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • J.L.E. Dreyer, History of the Planetary Systems from Thales to Kepler (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1906), p. 344

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Gingerich, in Kepler versus Lansbergen: On Computing Ephemerides 1632–1662, ed. by R.L. Kremer, J. Wlodarczyk. Johannes Kepler: From Tübingen to Zagan, Studia Copernicana, vol XLII 2009 (Warsaw, 1970) pp. 113–117

    Google Scholar 

  • J.F.W. Herschel, A Prelimnary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy (London, 1831), p. 266

    Google Scholar 

  • P.J. Huber, Astronomical Dating of Babylon I and Ur III, Occasional Papers on the Near East, 1(4), (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Jones, Astronomical Papyri from Oxyrhynchus, American Philosophical Society Memoirs, 1999, pp. 177–78, plate VII, 2, 170

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Thomann, Article in Chronique d’Egypte LXXXVIII (2013), fasc. 176; see also the photograph of the header in David King, Synchrony with the Heavens, vol. 1 (Boston, 2004) p. 421

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Thomann, in An Arabic Ephemeris for the Year 931–932 CE, ed. by A. Kaplony, et al., From Bawit to Marw (Leiden, 2015a), p. 115

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Thomann, in An Arabic Ephemeris for the Year 931–932 CE, p. 115, ed. by A. Kaplony, et al., From Bawit to Marw (Leiden, 2015b), p. 116

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to acknowledge the assistance in the early part of this essay from Richard Kremer, Alexander Jones, and Johannes Thomann.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Owen Gingerich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gingerich, O. (2017). The Role of Ephemerides from Ptolemy to Kepler. In: Arias, E., Combrinck, L., Gabor, P., Hohenkerk, C., Seidelmann, P. (eds) The Science of Time 2016. Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, vol 50. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59909-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics