Skip to main content

Word Memory Test

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • 1104 Accesses

Definition

The Word Memory Test (WMT; Green 2003; Green et al. 1996) is a well-validated effort test. It has been employed in many studies with diverse control and clinical samples of children and adults with an emphasis on traumatic brain injuries, chronic pain, and self-reported depression (Dunn et al. 2003; Gervais et al. 2001, 2004; Gorissen et al. 2005; Green 2003, 2007; Green and Flaro 2003; Green and Iverson 2001; Green et al. 1996, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003; Iverson et al. 1999; O’Bryant and Lucas 2006; Rohling et al. 2002a, b; Tan et al. 2002; Williamson et al. 2003). The WMT is a computerized test of the ability to learn a list of 20 word pairs. It takes about 7 min of the tester’s time and about 20 min of the patient’s time. The examinee is instructed to watch and remember a list of 20 semantically related word pairs (e.g., dog/cat, man/woman, pig/bacon, fish/fin). Each word pair is presented for 6 s. The list is presented twice. For immediate recognition (IR), the person is...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • Batt, K., Shores, E. A., & Chekaluk, E. (2008). The effect of distraction on the Word Memory Test and Test of Memory Malingering performance in patients with a severe brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14(6), 1074–1080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, L., O’Bryant, S. E., Lynch, J. K., McCaffrey, R. J., & Fisher, J. M. (2007). Examining the Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1 and Word Memory Test Immediate Recognition as screening tools for insufficient effort. Assessment, 14(3), 215–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, J. C., Dinkins, J. P., Allen, L. M., 3rd, & Kuroski, K. (2003). Age related effects in children taking the computerized assessment of response bias and word memory test. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section C, Child Neuropsychology, 9(2), 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, T. M., Shear, P. K., Howe, S., & Ris, M. D. (2003). Detecting neuropsychological malingering: Effects of coaching and information. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18(2), 121–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flaro, L., Green, P., & Robertson, E. (2007). Word Memory Test failure 23 times higher in mild brain injury than in parents seeking custody: The power of external incentives. Brain Injury, 21(4), 373–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, R. O., Russell, A. S., Green, P., Allen, L. M., 3rd, Ferrari, R., & Pieschl, S. D. (2001). Effort testing in patients with fibromyalgia and disability incentives. Journal of Rheumatology, 28(8), 1892–1899.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, R. O., Rohling, M. L., Green, P., & Ford, W. (2004). A comparison of WMT, CARB, and TOMM failure rates in non-head injury disability claimants. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(4), 475–487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorissen, M., Sanz, J. C., & Schmand, B. (2005). Effort and cognition in schizophrenia patients. Schizophrenia Research, 78(2–3), 199–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. (2003). Word Memory Test for Windows: User’s manual and program. Edmonton: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. (2007). Spoiled for choice: Making comparisons between forced-choice effort tests. In K. B. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective (pp. 50–77). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., & Flaro, L. (2003). Word memory test performance in children. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section C, Child Neuropsychology, 9(3), 189–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., & Iverson, G. L. (2001). Effects of injury severity and cognitive exaggeration on olfactory deficits in head injury compensation claims. NeuroRehabilitation, 16(4), 237–243.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., Allen, L. M., & Astner, K. (1996). The Word Memory Test: A user’s guide to the oral and computer-administered forms, US version 1.1. Durham: CogniSyst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., Iverson, G. L., & Allen, L. (1999). Detecting malingering in head injury litigation with the Word Memory Test. Brain Injury, 13(10), 813–819.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., Rohling, M. L., Lees-Haley, P. R., & Allen, L. M., 3rd. (2001). Effort has a greater effect on test scores than severe brain injury in compensation claimants. Brain Injury, 15(12), 1045–1060.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., Lees-Haley, P. R., & Allen, L. M. (2002). The Word Memory Test and the validity of neuropsychological test scores. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2(3/4), 97–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., Rohling, M. L., Iverson, G. L., & Gervais, R. O. (2003). Relationships between olfactory discrimination and head injury severity. Brain Injury, 17(6), 479–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greiffenstein, M. F., Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., & Baker, W. J. (2008). Test of Memory Malingering and Word Memory Test: A new comparison of failure concordance rates. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(7–8), 801–807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, K. W., Ord, J., Curtis, K. L., Bianchini, K. J., & Brennan, A. (2008). Detecting malingering in traumatic brain injury and chronic pain: A comparison of three forced-choice symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22(5), 896–918.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, G. L., Green, P., & Gervais, R. (1999). Using the Word Memory Test to detect biased responding in head injury litigation. Journal of Cognitive Rehabilitation, 2, 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Bryant, S. E., & Lucas, J. A. (2006). Estimating the predictive value of the Test of Memory Malingering: An illustrative example for clinicians. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20(3), 533–540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohling, M. L., Allen, L. M., & Green, P. (2002a). Who is exaggerating cognitive impairment and who is not? CNS Spectrums, 7(5), 387–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohling, M. L., Green, P., Allen, L. M., & Iverson, G. L. (2002b). Depressive symptoms and neurocognitive test scores in patients passing symptom validity tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17(3), 205–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, A., Friedel, E., Mehren, G., & Merten, T. (2008). Malingering and uncooperativeness in psychiatric and psychological assessment: Prevalence and effects in a German sample of claimants. Psychiatry Research, 157(1–3), 191–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, B. K., May, K., & Galbally, L. (2007). Symptom exaggeration by college adults in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disorder assessments. Applied Neuropsychology, 14(3), 189–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. E., Slick, D. J., Strauss, E., & Hultsch, D. F. (2002). How’d they do it? Malingering strategies on symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16(4), 495–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, D. J. G., Green, P., Allen, L., & Rohling, M. L. (2003). Evaluating effort with the Word Memory Test and Category Test- or not: Inconsistencies in a compensation-seeking sample. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 3(3), 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grant L. Iverson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Iverson, G.L. (2018). Word Memory Test. In: Kreutzer, J., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_218-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_218-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56782-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56782-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics