Skip to main content

Tower of London

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • 106 Accesses

Synonyms

Tower of Hanoi; Tower of Toronto

Description

The Tower of London (TOL) is an executive function task utilized primarily to assess planning capacity, although it can also be used to evaluate working memory, rule learning, the ability to inhibit responding, self-monitoring and regulation, problem solving, and establishing and maintaining set. There are a multitude of TOL tasks in existence, but the initial TOL was devised by Tim Shallice (1982) as an improvement upon the Tower of Hanoi (TOH) task (see Historical Background). Shallice employed his TOL to assess planning in patients with frontal lobe lesions.

Shallice’s TOL task consists of two boards, each of which contains three vertical pegs of increasing length and three different colored (red, blue, and green) beads or balls that are placed onto the pegs. The shortest peg only accommodates one bead; the second, two; and the third, three. On the examiner’s board, the beads are arranged on the pegs in a goal position, and on...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References and Reading

  • Baron, I. S. (2004). Neuropsychological evaluation of the child. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, W. K., & Byrd, D. L. (2002). The tower of London spatial problem-solving task: Enhancing clinical and research implementation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(5), 586–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, P. H., Sperber, R. J., & McCauley, C. (1984). Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culbertson, W., & Zillmer, E. A. (2005). Tower of London Drexel University – 2nd edition (TOL-DX 2nd edition). North Tonawanda: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafer, K. L., & Hunter, M. (1997). On testing the validity of planning/problem-solving tasks in a normal population. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3(2), 108–119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaller, C. P., Unterrainer, J. M., Kaiser, S., Weisbrod, M., & Aschenbrenner, S. (2012a). Tower of London—Freiburg version. Mödling: Schuhfried.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaller, C. P., Unterrainer, J. M., & Stahl, C. (2012b). Assessing planning ability with the tower of London task: Psychometric properties of a structurally balanced problem set. Psychologial Assessment, 24(1), 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaller, C. P., Debelak, R., Köstering, L., Egle, J., Rahm, B., Wild, P. S., Blettner, M., Beutel, M. E., & Unterrainer, J. M. (2016). Assessing planning ability across the adult life span: Population-representative and age-adjusted reliability estimates for the tower of London (TOL-F). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(2), 148–164.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Köstering, L., Schmidt, C. S., Egger, K., Amtage, F., Peter, J., Klöppel, S., Beume, L. A., Hoeren, M., Weiller, C., & Kaller, C. P. (2015). Assessment of planning performance in clinical samples: Reliability and validity of the tower of London task (TOL-F). Neuropsychologia, 75, 646–655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, J., Boxer, A., Cahn-Weiner, D., Johnson, J., Quitania, L., Rankin, K., et al. (n.d.). The assessment of executive functioning: A selective review of the literature. In Examiner. Retrieved, January 30, 2010, from http://examiner.ucsf.edu/Related_Literature/literature_search.htm.

  • Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. H., Wynn, V., Gilhooly, K. J., Della Sala, S., & Logie, R. H. (1999). The role of memory in the tower of London task. Memory, 7(2), 209–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Cyr, J. A., Taylor, A. E., & Lang, A. E. (1988). Procedural learning and neostriatal dysfunction in man. Brain, 111(Pt. 4), 941–959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schnirman, G. M., Welsh, M. C., & Retzlaff, P. D. (1998). Development of the tower of London-revised. Assessment, 5(4), 355–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T. (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London B. Biological Sciences, 298(1089), 199–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, G., & Allport, A. (1997). Planning and problem-solving using the 5-disc tower of London task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 50A(1), 49–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denise Krch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Krch, D. (2018). Tower of London. In: Kreutzer, J., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_1912-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_1912-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56782-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56782-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics