Skip to main content

The Relational Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the EPR Paradox

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Quantum World

Part of the book series: The Frontiers Collection ((FRONTCOLL))

Abstract

Bernad d’Espagnat. Most of us, of course, have heard of the new and daring interpretation of quantum mechanics proposed by Carlo Rovelli, who is here today, called Relational Quantum Mechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cf. Carlo Rovelli, “Relational quantum mechanics”, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35, 1996, p. 1637–1678.

    Google Scholar 

  2. John von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics [1932], Princeton University Press, 1996; Eugene Wigner; Group Theory and its Application to the Quantum Mechanics of Atomic Spectra [1931], New York, Academic Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alexei Grinbaum, “Reconstruction of quantum theory”, Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 58, 2007, p. 387–408.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. See (1)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Matteo Smerlak & Carlo Rovelli, “Relational EPR”, Found. Phys., 37, 2007, p. 427–445.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Michel Bitbol, “An analysis of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations in terms of events”, Phys. Lett. A, 96(2), 1983, p. 66–70.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Federico Laudisa, “The EPR argument in a relational interpretation of quantum mechanics”, Found. Phys. Lett., 14, 2001, p. 119–132.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. See Bernard d’Espagnat’s comment at the start of session VIII, “Exchange of views on the relational interpretation”.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See (5)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bas van Fraassen, “Rovelli’s world”, Found. Phys., 40(4), 2010, p. 390–417.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. “The tentative advance of “immanent relativity” in contemporary interpretations of quantum mechanics. II) Relational interpretations”, in De l’intérieur du monde, Flammarion, 2010, p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See (1)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hugh Everett III, « ‘Relative state’ formulation of quantum mechanics » , Rev. Mod. Phys., 29, 1957, p. 454–462.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hervé Zwirn, Les Limites de la connaissance, Paris, Odile Jacob, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See sessions III « Experimental approaches on decoherence » and IV “Exchange of views on decoherence”.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smerlak, M. (2017). The Relational Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the EPR Paradox. In: d'Espagnat, B., Zwirn, H. (eds) The Quantum World. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55420-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics