Abstract
The chemical industry is one of the most well-known high-risk areas in modern society. Chemical accidents can have a great and lasting impact on the public’s perception of a chemical facility’s risk. The number of reported accidents constitutes a natural direct source of information on accidents risk. Reports provide a better understanding of two risk criteria, frequency and consequence, and help to identify hazardous chemicals, which can thereafter prevent accidents. Many published risk and accident data reports give information on the number of accidents or the numerator of the frequency calculation. However, they appear blind to information on exposure, such as the scale of the facility operation (the frequency denominator). This study will present how neglecting the denominator in frequency calculation gives misleading risk alerts. The research also proposes suitable denominators and a method to combine different frequency data based on partial order. Higher data size is also a good confidence indicator in frequency estimation. Results show that normalization with a suitable denominator is important, and the task is possible with the availability of many accident databases. Furthermore, partial order ranking using the Hasse diagram gives an overall hazard view of chemicals; it was able to estimate the percentage of chemicals performing above acceptable risk using only a small sample size.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al-Sharrah G (2010) Ranking using the Copeland score: a comparison with the Hasse diagram. J Chem Inf Model 50:785–791
Ashby J, Doerrer N, Flamm F, Harris J, Hughes D, Johannsen F, Lewis S, Krivanek N, McCarthy J, Moolenaar R, Raabe G, Reynolds R, Smith J, Stevens J, Teta M, Wilson J (1990) A scheme for classifying carcinogens. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 12:270–295
Belke JC (2000) Chemical accident risks in U.S. industry – a preliminary analysis of accident risk data from U.S. hazardous chemical facilities. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Chemical emergency preparedness and prevention Office. http://www.epa.gov/ceppo/pubs/stockholmpaper.pdf
Burgherr P, Hirschberg S (2008) Severe accident risks in fossil energy chains: a comparative analysis. Energy 33:538–553
Bruggemann R, Sørensen PB, Lerche D, Carlsen L (2004) Estimation of average ranks by a local partial order model. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44:618–625
Bruggemann R, Carlsen L, Voigt K, Wieland R (2013) PyHasse software for partial order analysis: scientific background and description of selected modules. In: Bruggemann R, Carlsen L, Wittmann J (eds) Multi-indicator systems and modelling in partial order. Springer, New York
Carson P, Mumford C (2002) Hazardous chemicals handbook, 2nd edn. Butterworth Heinemann, Great Britain
Crowl D, Louvar J (2011) Chemical process safety: fundamentals with applications, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Boston, MA
Duan W, Chen G, Ye Q, Chen Q (2011) The situation of hazardous chemical accidents in China between 2000 and 2006. J Hazard Mater 186:1489–1494
Eichengreen B (1994) Institutional prerequisites for economic growth: Europe after World War II. Eur Econ Rev 38(3–4):883–890
Halfon E, Reggiani M (1986) On ranking chemicals for environmental hazard. Environ Sci Technol 20:1173–1179
Khan FI, Abbasi SA (1999) The world’s worst industrial accidents of the 1990s, what happened and what might have been: a quantitative study. Process Saf Prog 18(3):135–145
Khan FI, Abbasi SA (2001) Risk analysis of a typical chemical industry using ORA procedure. J Loss Prev Process Ind 14:43–59
Kletz TA (1980) Benefits and risks: their assessment in relation to human needs. IAEA Bull 22(5/6):2–12
Meel A, O’Neilla LM, Levina JH, Seidera WD, Oktemb U, Kerenc N (2007) Operational risk assessment of chemical industries by exploiting accident databases. J Loss Prev Process Ind 20(2):113–127
OGP, International Association of Oil & Gas Producers, March 2010. Risk Assessment Data Directory: Report No. 434 – 11.1, March 2010, Aviation transport accident statistics. http://www.ogp.org.uk/pubs/434-11.pdf
Patil GP, Taillie C (2004) Multiple indicators, partially ordered sets and linear extensions: multi-criterion ranking and prioritization. Environ Ecol Stat 11:199–228
Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD, West R (2004) Plant design and economics for chemical engineers, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Rachel’s (1994) Rachel’s Environment & Health Weekly # 408.Environmental Research Foundation. www.monitor.net.rachel.r408.html
Robb DJ, Liu F, Richard Lai R, Ren J (2012) Inventory in main land China: historical, industry, and geographic perspectives. Int J Prod Econ 135:440–450
Schweitzer L (2008) Accident frequencies in environmental assessment and land use studies. J Hazard Mater 156:44–50
Smith GS, Huang Y, Ho M, Chen PY (2006) The relationship between safety climate and injury rates across industries. The need to adjust for injury hazards. Accid Anal Prev 38(3):556–562
Squire RH (2001) Zero period process-a description of a process to zero injuries. Process Saf Prog 20(1):17–28
The 600 Report (1999) Commercial chemical incidents in the United States 1987–1996. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board
The National Board of Health and Welfare (2000) Chemical Accidents and Disasters Medical Care Planning Guidance Modin-Tryck, March 2000
U.S. Census Bureau (2005) 2002 Economic Census. Manufacturing geographic area series. EC02-31A-CA (RV). U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration. http://www.census.gov//econ/census02/guide/EC02_31.HTM
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Al-Sharrah, G. (2017). Ranking Chemicals with Respect to Accidents Frequency. In: Fattore, M., Bruggemann, R. (eds) Partial Order Concepts in Applied Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45421-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45421-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45419-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45421-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)