Skip to main content

Ranking Chemicals with Respect to Accidents Frequency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Partial Order Concepts in Applied Sciences
  • 398 Accesses

Abstract

The chemical industry is one of the most well-known high-risk areas in modern society. Chemical accidents can have a great and lasting impact on the public’s perception of a chemical facility’s risk. The number of reported accidents constitutes a natural direct source of information on accidents risk. Reports provide a better understanding of two risk criteria, frequency and consequence, and help to identify hazardous chemicals, which can thereafter prevent accidents. Many published risk and accident data reports give information on the number of accidents or the numerator of the frequency calculation. However, they appear blind to information on exposure, such as the scale of the facility operation (the frequency denominator). This study will present how neglecting the denominator in frequency calculation gives misleading risk alerts. The research also proposes suitable denominators and a method to combine different frequency data based on partial order. Higher data size is also a good confidence indicator in frequency estimation. Results show that normalization with a suitable denominator is important, and the task is possible with the availability of many accident databases. Furthermore, partial order ranking using the Hasse diagram gives an overall hazard view of chemicals; it was able to estimate the percentage of chemicals performing above acceptable risk using only a small sample size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Sharrah G (2010) Ranking using the Copeland score: a comparison with the Hasse diagram. J Chem Inf Model 50:785–791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby J, Doerrer N, Flamm F, Harris J, Hughes D, Johannsen F, Lewis S, Krivanek N, McCarthy J, Moolenaar R, Raabe G, Reynolds R, Smith J, Stevens J, Teta M, Wilson J (1990) A scheme for classifying carcinogens. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 12:270–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belke JC (2000) Chemical accident risks in U.S. industry – a preliminary analysis of accident risk data from U.S. hazardous chemical facilities. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Chemical emergency preparedness and prevention Office. http://www.epa.gov/ceppo/pubs/stockholmpaper.pdf

  • Burgherr P, Hirschberg S (2008) Severe accident risks in fossil energy chains: a comparative analysis. Energy 33:538–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruggemann R, Sørensen PB, Lerche D, Carlsen L (2004) Estimation of average ranks by a local partial order model. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44:618–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruggemann R, Carlsen L, Voigt K, Wieland R (2013) PyHasse software for partial order analysis: scientific background and description of selected modules. In: Bruggemann R, Carlsen L, Wittmann J (eds) Multi-indicator systems and modelling in partial order. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson P, Mumford C (2002) Hazardous chemicals handbook, 2nd edn. Butterworth Heinemann, Great Britain

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowl D, Louvar J (2011) Chemical process safety: fundamentals with applications, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan W, Chen G, Ye Q, Chen Q (2011) The situation of hazardous chemical accidents in China between 2000 and 2006. J Hazard Mater 186:1489–1494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen B (1994) Institutional prerequisites for economic growth: Europe after World War II. Eur Econ Rev 38(3–4):883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfon E, Reggiani M (1986) On ranking chemicals for environmental hazard. Environ Sci Technol 20:1173–1179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan FI, Abbasi SA (1999) The world’s worst industrial accidents of the 1990s, what happened and what might have been: a quantitative study. Process Saf Prog 18(3):135–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan FI, Abbasi SA (2001) Risk analysis of a typical chemical industry using ORA procedure. J Loss Prev Process Ind 14:43–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kletz TA (1980) Benefits and risks: their assessment in relation to human needs. IAEA Bull 22(5/6):2–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Meel A, O’Neilla LM, Levina JH, Seidera WD, Oktemb U, Kerenc N (2007) Operational risk assessment of chemical industries by exploiting accident databases. J Loss Prev Process Ind 20(2):113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OGP, International Association of Oil & Gas Producers, March 2010. Risk Assessment Data Directory: Report No. 434 – 11.1, March 2010, Aviation transport accident statistics. http://www.ogp.org.uk/pubs/434-11.pdf

  • Patil GP, Taillie C (2004) Multiple indicators, partially ordered sets and linear extensions: multi-criterion ranking and prioritization. Environ Ecol Stat 11:199–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD, West R (2004) Plant design and economics for chemical engineers, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachel’s (1994) Rachel’s Environment & Health Weekly # 408.Environmental Research Foundation. www.monitor.net.rachel.r408.html

  • Robb DJ, Liu F, Richard Lai R, Ren J (2012) Inventory in main land China: historical, industry, and geographic perspectives. Int J Prod Econ 135:440–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer L (2008) Accident frequencies in environmental assessment and land use studies. J Hazard Mater 156:44–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GS, Huang Y, Ho M, Chen PY (2006) The relationship between safety climate and injury rates across industries. The need to adjust for injury hazards. Accid Anal Prev 38(3):556–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire RH (2001) Zero period process-a description of a process to zero injuries. Process Saf Prog 20(1):17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The 600 Report (1999) Commercial chemical incidents in the United States 1987–1996. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board

    Google Scholar 

  • The National Board of Health and Welfare (2000) Chemical Accidents and Disasters Medical Care Planning Guidance Modin-Tryck, March 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2005) 2002 Economic Census. Manufacturing geographic area series. EC02-31A-CA (RV). U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration. http://www.census.gov//econ/census02/guide/EC02_31.HTM

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghanima Al-Sharrah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Al-Sharrah, G. (2017). Ranking Chemicals with Respect to Accidents Frequency. In: Fattore, M., Bruggemann, R. (eds) Partial Order Concepts in Applied Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45421-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics