Abstract
Afforestation projects are viewed as potentially effective measures for carbon sequestration and therefore climate change mitigation. Increasing demands for bioenergy products also require land for woodland plantations. Much of the land in temperate regions suitable for afforestation is used for agriculture and consequently afforestation of farmland is frequently proposed. Land owners are commonly reluctant to sacrifice fertile land for purposes other than food and feed production. In Scotland’s uplands, grazed pastures are a common land use that could be put under pressure by demands for woodland planting. This chapter explores how farm woodland planting for carbon sequestration and biofuel production affects livestock output. Sheep productivity, soil carbon and tree biomass data from a hill farm in Aberdeenshire, Scotland, are used to estimate the carbon balance and agricultural output of farm woodland plots and silvopastoral systems. The conceptual ideas of trade-off curves are illustrated with the example of ‘trees versus sheep’. Planting trees on pastureland can have varying impact on sheep depending on density and planting system. Within the concepts of trade-offs and synergies, it is furthermore discussed whether agroforestry systems such as silvopasture can ameliorate trade-offs between woodland and agriculture by enhancing agricultural productivity while also providing carbon benefits. The concepts presented show that there is great potential for integrating agriculture and forestry to achieve environmental benefits without compromising productivity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Balandier, P., & Dupraz, C. (1998). Growth of widely spaced trees. A case study from young agroforestry plantations in france. Agroforestry Systems, 43, 151–167.
Beckert, M. R., Smith, P., Lilly, A., & Chapman, S. J. (2015). Soil and tree biomass carbon sequestration potential of silvopastoral and woodland-pasture systems in North East Scotland. Agroforestry Systems. doi:10.1007/s10457-015-9860-4.
Campbell, C. D., Lilly, A., Towers, W., Chapman, S. J., Werritty, A., & Hanley, N. (2013). Land use and a low-carbon society. Earth and environmental science transactions of the royal society of edinburgh, 103, 165–173.
Crabtree, B., Chalmers, N., & Eiser, D. (2001). Voluntary incentive schemes for farm forestry: Uptake, policy effectiveness and employment impacts. Forestry, 74, 455–465.
Cubbage, F., Balmelli, G., Bussoni, A., et al. (2012). Comparing silvopastoral systems and prospects in eight regions of the world. Agroforestry Systems, 86, 303–314.
Haile, S. G., Nair, V. D., & Nair, P. K. R. (2010). Contribution of trees to carbon storage in soils of silvopastoral systems in Florida, USA. Global Change Biology, 16, 427–438.
Hargreaves, K. J., Milne, R., & Cannell, M. G. R. (2003). Carbon balance of afforested peatland in Scotland. Forestry, 76, 299–317.
Hawke, M. F. (1991). Pasture production and animal performance under pine agroforestry in New Zealand. Forest Ecology and Management, 45, 109–118.
Ilberry, B., & Stiell, B. (1991). Uptake of the farm diversification grant scheme in england. Geography, 76, 259–263.
Jose, S. (2012). Agroforestry for conserving and enhancing biodiversity. Agroforestry Systems, 85, 1–8.
Kallenbach, R. L., Kerley, M. S., & Bishop-Hurley, G. J. (2006). Cumulative forage production, forage quality and livestock performance from an annual ryegrass and cereal rye mixture in a Pine Walnut Silvopasture. Agroforestry Systems, 66, 43–53.
Marsden, T., & Sonnino, R. (2008). Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies, 24, 422–431.
Mäkinen, H., & Hein, S. (2006). Effect of wide spacing on increment and branch properties of young Norway spruce. European Journal of Forest Research, 125, 239–248.
Mbow, C., Smith, P., Skole, D., Duguma, L., & Bustamante, M. (2014). Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 6, 8–14.
McGrath. (2014). UK faces significant shortage of farmland by 2030. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-28003435. Accessed May 29, 2015.
Moran, D., Macleod, M., Wall, E., Eory, V., Pajot, G., Matthews, R., et al. (2008). UK Marginal Abatement Cost Curves for agriculture and land use, land-use change and forestry sectors out to 2022, with qualitative analysis of options to 2050. London: Final Report to the Committee on Climate Change.
Morgan-Davies, C., Waterhouse, A., Pollock, M. L., & Holland, J. P. (2008). Integrating hill sheep production and newly established native woodland: Achieving sustainability through multiple land use in Scotland. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 6, 133–147.
Nerlich, K., Graeff-Hönninger, S., & Claupein, W. (2013). Agroforestry in Europe: A review of the disappearance of traditional systems and development of modern agroforestry practices, with emphasis on experiences in Germany. Agroforestry Systems, 87, 1211.
Pollard, J. C. (2006). Shelter for lambing sheep in New Zealand: A review. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 49, 395–404.
Richards, M. B., & Méndez, V. E. (2014). Interactions between carbon sequestration and shade tree diversity in a smallholder coffee cooperative in El Salvador. Conservation Biology, 28, 489–497.
Scottish Agricultural Statistics 1982 to 2014, the Scottish Government. http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Statistics/Browse/Agriculture-Fisheries/agritopics/LandUseAll. Accessed May 29, 2015.
Schoeneberger, M., Bentrup, G., De Gooijer, H., Soolanayakanahally, R., Sauer, T., Brandle, J., et al. (2012). Branching out: Agroforestry as a climate change mitigation and adaptation tool for agriculture. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 67, 128A–136A.
Schoeneberger, M. M. (2009). Agroforestry: Working trees for sequestering carbon on agricultural lands. Agroforestry Systems, 75, 27–37.
Schütz, K. E., Cox, N. R., & Tucker, C. B. (2014). A field study of the behavioral and physiological effects of varying amounts of shade for lactating cows at pasture. Journal of Dairy Science, 97, 3599–3605.
Sibbald, A.R., Griffiths, J.H., & Elston, D.A. (1991). The effects of the presence of widely spaced conifers on under-storey herbage production in the U.K. Forest Ecology and Management 45, pp. 71–77.
Sibbald. (1996). Silvopastoral Systems on temperate sown pasture: A personal perspective. In: Etienne (ed.) Western European Silvopastoral Systems. Institute National de la recherche agronomique.
Sibbald, A. R., Eason, W. R., Mcadam, J. H., & Hislop, A. M. (2001). The establishment phase of a silvopastoral national network experiment in the UK. Agroforestry Systems, 53, 39–53.
Sibbald 2006. Silvopastoral Agroforestry: A Land Use for the Future. Scottish Forestry, 60, pp. 4–7.
Tobias, P. (2011). Capitalizing on the carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry in Germany’s agricultural landscapes: Realigning the climate change mitigation and landscape conservation agendas. Landscape Research, 36, 435–454.
Van laer, E., Moons, C.P.H., Sonck, B., & Tuyttens, F.A.M. (2014). Importance of outdoor shelter for cattle in temperate climates. Livestock Science 159, pp. 87–101.
Woodland expansion advisory group 2012. Final report http://scotland.forestry.gov.uk/images/corporate/pdf/WEAGFinalReport.pdf. Accessed May 29, 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beckert, M., Smith, P., Chapman, S. (2016). Of Trees and Sheep: Trade-Offs and Synergies in Farmland Afforestation in the Scottish Uplands. In: Niewöhner, J., et al. Land Use Competition. Human-Environment Interactions, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33628-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33628-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33626-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33628-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)