Skip to main content

Of Trees and Sheep: Trade-Offs and Synergies in Farmland Afforestation in the Scottish Uplands

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Land Use Competition

Part of the book series: Human-Environment Interactions ((HUEN,volume 6))

Abstract

Afforestation projects are viewed as potentially effective measures for carbon sequestration and therefore climate change mitigation. Increasing demands for bioenergy products also require land for woodland plantations. Much of the land in temperate regions suitable for afforestation is used for agriculture and consequently afforestation of farmland is frequently proposed. Land owners are commonly reluctant to sacrifice fertile land for purposes other than food and feed production. In Scotland’s uplands, grazed pastures are a common land use that could be put under pressure by demands for woodland planting. This chapter explores how farm woodland planting for carbon sequestration and biofuel production affects livestock output. Sheep productivity, soil carbon and tree biomass data from a hill farm in Aberdeenshire, Scotland, are used to estimate the carbon balance and agricultural output of farm woodland plots and silvopastoral systems. The conceptual ideas of trade-off curves are illustrated with the example of ‘trees versus sheep’. Planting trees on pastureland can have varying impact on sheep depending on density and planting system. Within the concepts of trade-offs and synergies, it is furthermore discussed whether agroforestry systems such as silvopasture can ameliorate trade-offs between woodland and agriculture by enhancing agricultural productivity while also providing carbon benefits. The concepts presented show that there is great potential for integrating agriculture and forestry to achieve environmental benefits without compromising productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Balandier, P., & Dupraz, C. (1998). Growth of widely spaced trees. A case study from young agroforestry plantations in france. Agroforestry Systems, 43, 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, M. R., Smith, P., Lilly, A., & Chapman, S. J. (2015). Soil and tree biomass carbon sequestration potential of silvopastoral and woodland-pasture systems in North East Scotland. Agroforestry Systems. doi:10.1007/s10457-015-9860-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. D., Lilly, A., Towers, W., Chapman, S. J., Werritty, A., & Hanley, N. (2013). Land use and a low-carbon society. Earth and environmental science transactions of the royal society of edinburgh, 103, 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, B., Chalmers, N., & Eiser, D. (2001). Voluntary incentive schemes for farm forestry: Uptake, policy effectiveness and employment impacts. Forestry, 74, 455–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cubbage, F., Balmelli, G., Bussoni, A., et al. (2012). Comparing silvopastoral systems and prospects in eight regions of the world. Agroforestry Systems, 86, 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haile, S. G., Nair, V. D., & Nair, P. K. R. (2010). Contribution of trees to carbon storage in soils of silvopastoral systems in Florida, USA. Global Change Biology, 16, 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, K. J., Milne, R., & Cannell, M. G. R. (2003). Carbon balance of afforested peatland in Scotland. Forestry, 76, 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawke, M. F. (1991). Pasture production and animal performance under pine agroforestry in New Zealand. Forest Ecology and Management, 45, 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilberry, B., & Stiell, B. (1991). Uptake of the farm diversification grant scheme in england. Geography, 76, 259–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose, S. (2012). Agroforestry for conserving and enhancing biodiversity. Agroforestry Systems, 85, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallenbach, R. L., Kerley, M. S., & Bishop-Hurley, G. J. (2006). Cumulative forage production, forage quality and livestock performance from an annual ryegrass and cereal rye mixture in a Pine Walnut Silvopasture. Agroforestry Systems, 66, 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T., & Sonnino, R. (2008). Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies, 24, 422–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkinen, H., & Hein, S. (2006). Effect of wide spacing on increment and branch properties of young Norway spruce. European Journal of Forest Research, 125, 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbow, C., Smith, P., Skole, D., Duguma, L., & Bustamante, M. (2014). Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 6, 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath. (2014). UK faces significant shortage of farmland by 2030. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-28003435. Accessed May 29, 2015.

  • Moran, D., Macleod, M., Wall, E., Eory, V., Pajot, G., Matthews, R., et al. (2008). UK Marginal Abatement Cost Curves for agriculture and land use, land-use change and forestry sectors out to 2022, with qualitative analysis of options to 2050. London: Final Report to the Committee on Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan-Davies, C., Waterhouse, A., Pollock, M. L., & Holland, J. P. (2008). Integrating hill sheep production and newly established native woodland: Achieving sustainability through multiple land use in Scotland. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 6, 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerlich, K., Graeff-Hönninger, S., & Claupein, W. (2013). Agroforestry in Europe: A review of the disappearance of traditional systems and development of modern agroforestry practices, with emphasis on experiences in Germany. Agroforestry Systems, 87, 1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, J. C. (2006). Shelter for lambing sheep in New Zealand: A review. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 49, 395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, M. B., & Méndez, V. E. (2014). Interactions between carbon sequestration and shade tree diversity in a smallholder coffee cooperative in El Salvador. Conservation Biology, 28, 489–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Agricultural Statistics 1982 to 2014, the Scottish Government. http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Statistics/Browse/Agriculture-Fisheries/agritopics/LandUseAll. Accessed May 29, 2015.

  • Schoeneberger, M., Bentrup, G., De Gooijer, H., Soolanayakanahally, R., Sauer, T., Brandle, J., et al. (2012). Branching out: Agroforestry as a climate change mitigation and adaptation tool for agriculture. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 67, 128A–136A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeneberger, M. M. (2009). Agroforestry: Working trees for sequestering carbon on agricultural lands. Agroforestry Systems, 75, 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, K. E., Cox, N. R., & Tucker, C. B. (2014). A field study of the behavioral and physiological effects of varying amounts of shade for lactating cows at pasture. Journal of Dairy Science, 97, 3599–3605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibbald, A.R., Griffiths, J.H., & Elston, D.A. (1991). The effects of the presence of widely spaced conifers on under-storey herbage production in the U.K. Forest Ecology and Management 45, pp. 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibbald. (1996). Silvopastoral Systems on temperate sown pasture: A personal perspective. In: Etienne (ed.) Western European Silvopastoral Systems. Institute National de la recherche agronomique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibbald, A. R., Eason, W. R., Mcadam, J. H., & Hislop, A. M. (2001). The establishment phase of a silvopastoral national network experiment in the UK. Agroforestry Systems, 53, 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibbald 2006. Silvopastoral Agroforestry: A Land Use for the Future. Scottish Forestry, 60, pp. 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, P. (2011). Capitalizing on the carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry in Germany’s agricultural landscapes: Realigning the climate change mitigation and landscape conservation agendas. Landscape Research, 36, 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van laer, E., Moons, C.P.H., Sonck, B., & Tuyttens, F.A.M. (2014). Importance of outdoor shelter for cattle in temperate climates. Livestock Science 159, pp. 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodland expansion advisory group 2012. Final report http://scotland.forestry.gov.uk/images/corporate/pdf/WEAGFinalReport.pdf. Accessed May 29, 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marvin Beckert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beckert, M., Smith, P., Chapman, S. (2016). Of Trees and Sheep: Trade-Offs and Synergies in Farmland Afforestation in the Scottish Uplands. In: Niewöhner, J., et al. Land Use Competition. Human-Environment Interactions, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33628-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics