Abstract
The Iwahori–Hecke algebra \(\mathcal{H}\) of a Coxeter system (W, S) has a “standard basis” indexed by the elements of W and a “bar involution” given by a certain antilinear map. Together, these form an example of what Webster calls a pre-canonical structure, relative to which the well-known Kazhdan–Lusztig basis of \(\mathcal{H}\) is a canonical basis. Lusztig and Vogan defined a representation of a modified Iwahori–Hecke algebra on the free \(\mathbb{Z}[v,v^{-1}]\)-module generated by the set of twisted involutions in W, and showed that this module has a unique pre-canonical structure compatible with the \(\mathcal{H}\)-module structure, which admits its own canonical basis which can be viewed as a generalization of the Kazhdan–Lusztig basis. One can modify the definition of Lusztig and Vogan’s module to obtain other pre-canonical structures, each of which admits a unique canonical basis indexed by twisted involutions. We classify all of the pre-canonical structures which arise in this manner, and explain the relationships between their resulting canonical bases. Some of these canonical bases are equivalent in a trivial fashion to Lusztig and Vogan’s construction, while others appear to be unrelated. Along the way, we also clarify the differences between Webster’s notion of a canonical basis and the related concepts of an IC basis and a P-kernel.
Dedicated to David Vogan on the occasion of his 60th birthday
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. Björner and F. Brenti, Combinatorics of Coxeter Groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics Vol. 231. Springer, New York, 2005
F. Brenti, Twisted incidence algebras and Kazhdan–Lusztig–Stanley functions, Adv. Math. 148 (1999) 44–74.
F. Brenti, P-kernels, IC bases and Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials, J. Algebra 259 (2003) 613–627.
J. Du, IC Bases and Quantum Linear Groups, in Algebraic Groups and Their Generalizations: Quantum and infinite dimensional methods, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. Vol. 56, AMS, (1994), 135–148.
B. Elias and G. Williamson, The Hodge theory of Soergel bimodules, Ann. Math. 180 (2014), no. 3, 1089–1136.
R. M. Green and J. Losonczy, Canonical Bases for Hecke Algebra Quotients, Math. Res. Lett. 6 (1999), 213–222.
A. Hultman, Fixed points of involutive automorphisms of the Bruhat order, Adv. Math. 195 (2005), 283–296.
A. Hultman, The combinatorics of twisted involutions in Coxeter groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 359 (2007), 2787–2798.
A. Hultman, Twisted identities in Coxeter groups, J. Algebr. Combin. 28 (2008), 313–332.
F. Incitti, The Bruhat order on the Involutions of the Symmetric Group, J. Algebr. Combin. 20 (2004), 243–261.
F. Incitti, Bruhat order on the involutions of classical Weyl groups, Adv. Appl. Math. 37 (2006), 68–111.
D. Kazhdan and G. Lusztig, Representations of Coxeter groups and Hecke algebras, Invent. Math. 53 (1979), 165–184.
G. Lusztig, A bar operator for involutions in a Coxeter group, Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sinica (N.S.) 7 (2012), 355–404.
G. Lusztig and D. A. Vogan, Jr., Hecke algebras and involutions in Weyl groups, Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sinica (N.S.) 7 (2012), 323–354.
G. Lusztig and D. A. Vogan, Jr., Hecke algebras and involutions in Coxeter groups, this volume.
E. Marberg, Positivity conjectures for Kazhdan–Lusztig theory on twisted involutions: the universal case, Represent. Theory 18 (2014), 88–116.
E. Marberg, Positivity conjectures for Kazhdan–Lusztig theory on twisted involutions: the finite case, J. Algebra 413 (2014), 198–225.
T. A. Springer, Some results on algebraic groups with involutions, Advanced Studies in Pure Math. 6, 525–543, Kinokuniya/North-Holland, 1985.
R. P. Stanley, Subdivisions and local h-vectors, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 5 (1992), 805–851.
R. P. Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, Volume 1, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
W. Soergel, Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials and a combinatoric for tilting modules, Represent. Theory 1 (1997), 83–114.
B. Webster, Canonical bases and higher representation theory, Compos. Math. 151 (2015), 121–166.
Acknowledgements
I thank Daniel Bump, Persi Diaconis, Richard Green, George Lusztig, David Vogan, and Zhiwei Yun for helpful discussions related to the development of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marberg, E. (2015). Comparing and characterizing some constructions of canonical bases from Coxeter systems. In: Nevins, M., Trapa, P. (eds) Representations of Reductive Groups. Progress in Mathematics, vol 312. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23443-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23443-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23442-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23443-4
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)