Skip to main content

Case Study in Ordinal Regression, Data Reduction, and Penalization

  • Chapter
Regression Modeling Strategies

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Statistics ((SSS))

  • 204k Accesses

Abstract

This case study is taken from Harrell et al. 272 which described a World Health Organization study 439 in which vital signs and a large number of clinical signs and symptoms were used to develop a predictive model for an ordinal response. This response consists of laboratory assessments of diagnosis and severity of illness related to pneumonia, meningitis, and sepsis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    SaO 2 was measured but CXR was not done

  2. 2.

    Assumed zero since neither BC nor LP were done.

  3. 3.

    These age intervals were also found to adequately capture most of the interaction effects.

References

  1. D. G. Altman and P. K. Andersen. Bootstrap investigation of the stability of a Cox regression model. Stat Med, 8:771–783, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. W. S. Cleveland. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc, 74:829–836, 1979.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. R. J. Gray. Flexible methods for analyzing survival data using splines, with applications to breast cancer prognosis. J Am Stat Assoc, 87:942–951, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. F. E. Harrell, K. L. Lee, R. M. Califf, D. B. Pryor, and R. A. Rosati. Regression modeling strategies for improved prognostic prediction. Stat Med, 3:143–152, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. F. E. Harrell, P. A. Margolis, S. Gove, K. E. Mason, E. K. Mulholland, D. Lehmann, L. Muhe, S. Gatchalian, and H. F. Eichenwald. Development of a clinical prediction model for an ordinal outcome: The World Health Organization ARI Multicentre Study of clinical signs and etiologic agents of pneumonia, sepsis, and meningitis in young infants. Stat Med, 17:909–944, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Margolis, E. K. Mulholland, F. E. Harrell, S. Gove, and the WHO Young Infants Study Group. Clinical prediction of serious bacterial infections in young infants in developing countries. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 18S:S23–S31, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. G. M. Moons, Donders, E. W. Steyerberg, and F. E. Harrell. Penalized maximum likelihood estimation to directly adjust diagnostic and prognostic prediction models for overoptimism: a clinical example. J Clin Epi, 57:1262–1270, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Tibshirani. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J Roy Stat Soc B, 58:267–288, 1996.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Tibshirani. The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model. Stat Med, 16:385–395, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. X. Zhou. Effect of verification bias on positive and negative predictive values. Stat Med, 13:1737–1745, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harrell, F.E. (2015). Case Study in Ordinal Regression, Data Reduction, and Penalization. In: Regression Modeling Strategies. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics