Skip to main content

Societal Approach to Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: When Technology Reflects and Shapes Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nanosciences and Nanotechnology

Abstract

Through its convergence with a whole range of technologies developed in information science, biology, and cognitive science, nanotechnology reflects and shapes society. Because it has a tremendous capacity to transform our perceptions, practices, and representations of the future, it has political as well as economic and social impacts. Making the nanoworld more accessible by informing the public and introducing appropriate laws is an ethical imperative. Apart from education and incorporation in industrial processes and professions, this broadened access is a precondition for a proper public debate on the uses and also the limits of innovation, whenever the latter does not correspond to the general principles of responsibility and precaution. One aim here is to reflect upon the potential of nanotechnology in the context of the transhumanist agenda. It is essential to go beyond the traditional cost–benefit approach to an assessment based on the systemic nature of the risks induced by nanotechnology. The main goal of this chapter is to introduce the reader to this perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    L’homme est le seul être connu de nous qui puisse avoir une responsabilité. En pouvant l’avoir, il l’a.

  2. 2.

    Convergent technologies at the nanoscale provide ways to combine components involving at least one nanoscale dimension in the observation, simulation, manipulation, and production of nano-objects, nanomaterials, or nanosystems, whether these components are specified by their physical, chemical, or biological properties, or by a combination of them.

  3. 3.

    Decision of the European Court of Justice on 24 November 2011, prohibiting systematic filtering for Internet.

  4. 4.

    This is in reference to the New Deal, which was the recovery plan launched by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1933 to take America out of the 1929 depression.

  5. 5.

    NBIC is used in the reports of the United States National Science Foundation, while the term Converging Technologies for the European Knowledge Society (CTEKS) is used in reports by the high level group convened by the European Commission to examine the prospects for the new technology wave on the 2020 horizon.

  6. 6.

    A legal term in France referring to the shared aim bringing together several physical or legal entities to create a company and share the profits or losses.

  7. 7.

    An approach to the management of information that treats human attention as a scarce commodity, and applies economic theory to solve various information management problems.

  8. 8.

    TOTEM is the acronym for theories and tools for distributed authoring of mobile mixed reality games.

References

  1. M. Crichton, Prey (HarperCollins, New York, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Jonas, Pour une éthique du futur (Rivages, Paris, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. www.nano.gov

  4. Nanotechnology Risk Governance. International Risk Governance Council (IRGC), June 2006

    Google Scholar 

  5. Observatory Nano ceased activity in 2012, but archives are still available at the website www.observatorynano.eu

  6. www.smartregions.net

  7. US-EPA Regulatory Notices Concerning Nanoscale Materials. Announcement of the publication in July 2013 of general regulations concerning nanomaterials and other nanoscale products

    Google Scholar 

  8. Council of Europe report, 17 January 2013. Committee for social affairs, health, and sustainable development. Nanotechnology: balancing benefits and risks to public health and the environment

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. Packard, The Hidden Persuaders (Ig Publishing, New York, 2007) (reissue)

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. Packard, The Naked Society (Ig Publishing, New York, 2014) (reissue)

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Szybalski, A. Skalka, Nobel prizes and restriction enzymes. Gene 4(3), 181–182 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Synthetic biology. Concept note. International Risk Governance Council (IRGC), 23 p

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Yang, Synthetic biology and the future of man. Presented at the international symposium on opportunities and challenges in the emerging field of synthetic biology. Washington DC, USA, 9–10 July 2009, The National Academies’ Keck Center, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Laborit, La Vie antérieure (LGF, Paris, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Laborit, L’Homme imaginant, Union Générale d’Edition, Collection 10/18, 2nd edn (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Laborit, Le rôle de la communication dans l’évolution des êtres vivants. Centre d’études expérimentales de physiobiologie, de pharmacologie et d’eutonologie de l’hôpital Boucicaut. Propos recueillis, Bulletin de l’IREPP, April 1990, p. 49

    Google Scholar 

  17. www.cgm.org/themes/deveco/develop/nanofinal.pdf

  18. I. Asimov, Foundations’ Edge (Doubleday, New York, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Klein, Allons-nous liquider la science? Galilée contre les Indiens (Flammarion, Collection Café Voltaire, Paris, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. F. Wickson, Gobernanza nanotecnologica, por qué no podemos confiar en evaluaciones de riesgos cientificos. MundoNano, Revista interdiciplinaria en Nanociencia y Nanotecnologia, UNAM, Mexico, Vol. 4, no. 1, January–June 2011

    Google Scholar 

  21. Regulation (EC) no. 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008. JOCE of 31 December 2008

    Google Scholar 

  22. www.wwpdb.org

  23. F. Roure, Introduction to Part III, in Nanotoxicology and Nanoethics, ed. by M. Lahmani, F. Marano, P. Houdy (Springer, Berlin, 2011), pp. 420–421

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. Drexler, Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology (Anchor, New York, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Kurzweil, The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology (Penguin, New York, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. http://openwetware.org/wiki/The_BioBricks_Foundation

  27. www.biobricks.org

  28. E.L. Bernays, The engineering of consent. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 250, 113–120 (1947)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. U. Beck, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (Sage Publications, London, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Françoise Roure .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roure, F. (2016). Societal Approach to Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: When Technology Reflects and Shapes Society. In: Lourtioz, JM., Lahmani, M., Dupas-Haeberlin, C., Hesto, P. (eds) Nanosciences and Nanotechnology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19360-1_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics