Skip to main content

Abstract

Information on the health and wellness of people with intellectual and developmental disability (IDD) has been furthered by direct clinical assessments, community surveys, and health service research. Each of these presents with limitations, particularly in the area of generalization. Population based surveillance methods address this limitation and provide a representative look at the lives of people with IDD. National surveillance datasets are successful in presenting rich, nationally-representative information on health issues, however, they also present with limitations that do not apply to other methods of health research. For example, this methodology is unable to confirm diagnoses of health conditions endorsed by respondents, and information may not be as in-depth as smaller-scale studies such as direct assessment, community-based surveys, and health record reviews. Despite these limitations, we will in this chapter share examples of research findings that have been published using national surveillance data. Surveillance data has led to many discoveries in terms health status, care, and quality that can help health care providers anticipate the needs of patients with IDD and their families, and ultimately provide better care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 389.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Iacono T, Sutherland G. Health screening and developmental disabilities. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2006;3(3):155–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hild U, Hey C, Baumann U, Montgomery J, Euler HA, Neumann K. High prevalence of hearing disorders at the Special Olympics indicate need to screen persons with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008;52(Pt 6):520–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pezzementi ML, Fisher MA. Oral health status of people with intellectual disabilities in the southeastern United States. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(7):903–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Robertson J, Emerson E, Gregory N, Hatto C, Turner S, Kessissoglou S, et al. Lifestyle related risk factors for poor health in residential settings for people with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2000;21(6):469–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bershadsky J, Taub S, Engler J, Moseley CR, Lakin KC, Stancliffe RJ, et al. Place of residence and preventive health care for intellectual and developmental disabilities services recipients in 20 States. Public Health Rep. 2012;127(5):475–85.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Janicki MP, Davidson PW, Henderson CM, McCallion P, Taets JD, Force LT, et al. Health characteristics and health services utilization in older adults with intellectual disability living in community residences. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2002;46(Pt 4):287–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lofters A, Glazier RH, Agha MM, Creatore MI, Moineddin R. Inadequacy of cervical cancer screening among urban recent immigrants: a population-based study of physician and laboratory claims in Toronto, Canada. Prev Med. 2007;44(6):536–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Spadea T, Bellini S, Kunst A, Stirbu I, Costa G. The impact of interventions to improve attendance in female cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups: a review. Prev Med. 2010;50(4):159–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cobigo V, Ouellette-Kuntz H, Balogh R, Leung F, Lin E, Lunsky Y. Are cervical and breast cancer screening programmes equitable? The case of women with intellectual and developmental disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013;57(5):478–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Obi O, Van Naarden Braun K, Baio J, Drews-Botsch C, Devine O, Yeargin-Allsopp M. Effect of incorporating adaptive functioning scores on the prevalence of intellectual disability. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2011;116(5):360–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis MA, Lewis CE, Leake B, King BH, Lindemann R. The quality of health care for adults with developmental disabilities. Public Health Rep. 2002;117(2):174–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Willis D, Kennedy C, Kilbride L. Breast cancer screening in women with learning disabilities: current knowledge and considerations. Br J Learn Disabil. 2008;36(3):171–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin E, Balogh R, Cobigo V, Ouellette-Kuntz H, Wilton AS, et al. Using administrative health data to identify individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities: a comparison of algorithms. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013;57(5):462–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shireman TI, Reichard A, Nazir N, Backes JM, Greiner KA. Quality of diabetes care for adults with developmental disabilities. Disabil Health J. 2010;3(3):179–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hall A, Wood D, Hou T, Zhang J. Patterns in primary health care utilization among individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Florida. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2007;45(5):310–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin P-Y, Lin L-P, Lin J-D. Hypertension, hyperglycemia, and hyperlipemia among adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2010;31(2):545–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tyler J, Carl V, Schramm S, Karafa M, Tang AS, Jain A. Electronic health record analysis of the primary care of adults with intellectual and other developmental disabilities. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2010;7(3):204–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Terris DD, Litaker DG, Koroukian SM. Health state information derived from secondary databases is affected by multiple sources of bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(7):734–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lalor A, Redmond R. Breast screening for post-menopausal women. Learn Disabil Pract. 2009;12(9):28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray CJL. Towards good practice for health statistics: lessons from the millennium development goal health indicators. Lancet. 2007;369(9564):862–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Commissioner’s Task Force on Aging Subcommittee on Health. Preventative health care screening guidelines for people aging with intellectual and other developmental disabilities [Internet]. New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities. 2009. http://ucp.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/preventive-health-care-screening-guidelines-for-people-aging-with-intellecutal-and-develpmental-disabilities.pdf

  22. Human Services Research Institute and National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disability Services. Welcome – National Core Indicators [Internet]. NCI 2014. http://www.nationalcoreindicators.org/

  23. Lunsky Y, Emery CF, Benson BA. Staff and self-reports of health behaviours, somatic complaints, and medications among adults with mild intellectual disability. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2002;27(2):125–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Havercamp SM, Scandlin D, Roth M. Health disparities among adults with developmental disabilities, adults with other disabilities, and adults not reporting disability in North Carolina. Public Health Rep. 2004;119(4):418–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Stancliffe RJ, Lakin KC, Larson SA, Engler J, Taub S, Fortune J, et al. Demographic characteristics, health conditions, and residential service use in adults with Down syndrome in 25 U.S. states. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012;50(2):92–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Scott HM. The stress-mental health relationship: social support and physical activity as moderators in adults with intellectual disabilities [Internet]. The Ohio State University. 2012. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/ap/10?0::NO:10:P10_ETD_SUBID:76789

  27. Van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk H, Linehan C, Kerr M, Noonan-Walsh P. Developing health indicators for people with intellectual disabilities. The method of the Pomona project. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2007;51(Pt. 6):427–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Perry J, Linehan C, Kerr M, Salvador-Carulla L, Zeilinger E, Weber G, et al. The P15 – a multinational assessment battery for collecting data on health indicators relevant to adults with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010;54(11):981–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Larson SA, Lakin KC, Anderson L, Kwak N, Lee JH, Anderson D. Prevalence of mental retardation and developmental disabilities: estimates from the 1994/1995 National Health Interview Survey Disability Supplements. Am J Ment Retard. 2001;106(3):231–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Braddock D, Emerson E, Felce D, Stancliffe RJ. Living circumstances of children and adults with mental retardation or developmental disabilities in the United States, Canada, England and Wales, and Australia. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2001;7(2):115–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. White P, Chant D, Edwards N, Townsend C, Waghorn G. Prevalence of intellectual disability and comorbid mental illness in an Australian community sample. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005;39(5):395–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Central Statistics Office. National Disability Survey [Internet]. National disability survey. http://www.cso.ie/en/nationaldisabilitysurvey/

  33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NHANES – about the national health and nutrition examination survey [Internet]. About the health and nutrition examination survey. 2014. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/about_nhanes.htm

  34. NHIS – About the National Health Interview Survey [Internet]. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/about_nhis.htm

  35. National Survey of Children’s Health – Data Resource Center for Child and Adolescent Health [Internet]. http://www.childhealthdata.org/learn/NSCH

  36. National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs – Data Resource Center [Internet]. http://www.childhealthdata.org/learn/NS-CSHCN

  37. Bandini LG, Curtin C, Hamad C, Tybor DJ, Must A. Prevalence of overweight in children with developmental disorders in the continuous National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2002. J Pediatr. 2005;146(6):738–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schieve LA, Gonzalez V, Boulet SL, Visser SN, Rice CE, Braun KVN, et al. Concurrent medical conditions and health care use and needs among children with learning and behavioral developmental disabilities, National Health Interview Survey, 2006–2010. Res Dev Disabil. 2012;33(2):467–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT, Auinger P. Dental needs and status of autistic children: results from the National Survey of Children’s Health. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30(1):54–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nageswaran S, Parish S, Rose R, Grady M. Do children with developmental disabilities and mental health conditions have greater difficulty using health services than children with physical disorders? Matern Child Health Bureau. 2011;15:634–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nevill REA. Impact of children with developmental disabilities and behavior problems on parenting stress [Internet]. The Ohio State University. 2012. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/ap/10?0::NO:10:P10_ACCESSION_NUM:osu1354289996

  42. Pak V, Souders MC. Advancing the science of environmental exposures during pregnancy and the gene-environment through the National Children’s Study. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012;41(6):846–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Paneth N. Restoring science to the national children’s study. JAMA. 2013;309(17):1775–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hellerstedt WL, McGovern PM, Fontaine P, Oberg CN, Cordes JE. Prenatal environmental exposures and child health: Minnesota’s role in the National Children’s Study. Minn Med. 2008;91(9):40–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Dietrich KN, Eskenazi B, Schantz S, Yolton K, Rauh VA, Johnson CB, et al. Principles and practices of neurodevelopmental assessment in children: lessons learned from the Centers for Children’s Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(10):1437–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan M. Havercamp Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nevill, R.E., Scott, H.M., Havercamp, S.M. (2016). Health Research in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. In: Rubin, I.L., Merrick, J., Greydanus, D.E., Patel, D.R. (eds) Health Care for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities across the Lifespan. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18096-0_167

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18096-0_167

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18095-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18096-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics