Skip to main content

Intrasexual Rivalry Among Women

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Synonyms

Intrasexual competition; Intrasexual selection; Within-sex competition; Within-sex selection

Definition

Intrasexual rivalry is a driving force behind sexual selection. Women’s intrasexual rivalry surrounds competition over reproductive opportunities and resources.

Introduction

Humans are among the less than 5 % of mammals that engage in biparental care. Men who invest resources toward mates and offspring are compelled to be more selective in their mate choice. Because men vary widely in their investment and in their overall value as a mate, women can benefit their reproductive fitness by outcompeting intrasexual rivals for the best mates. Yet because women must also remain alive to rear offspring, adaptations for same-sex rivalry are characteristically different in many ways from male competitive adaptations. Women are less likely to rely on violent and physically risky strategies. More surreptitious forms of competition by means of verbal derogation and indirect aggression...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). A multi-informant longitudinal study on the relationship between aggression, peer victimization, and adolescent dating status. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(2), 253–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2014). Sexual competition among women: A review of the theory and supporting evidence. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition. Oxford University Press. New York. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199376377.013.3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., Miller, J., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). Jealousy mediates the relationship between attractiveness comparison and females’ indirect aggression. Personal Relationships, 19(2), 290–303. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01362.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnocky, S., Bird, B. M., & Perilloux, C. (2014a). An evolutionary perspective on characteristics of physical attractiveness in humans. In A. Rennolds (Ed.), Psychology of interpersonal perception and relationships (pp. 115–155). New York: NOVA Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnocky, S., Ribout, A., Mirza, R., & Knack, J. M. (2014b). Perceived mate availability influences intrasexual competition, jealousy, and mate guarding behavior. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12(1), 45–64. doi:10.1556/JEP.12.2014.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleske-Rechek, A., & Buss, D. M. (2006). Sexual strategies pursued and mate attraction tactics deployed. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1299–1311. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbank, V. K. (1987). Female aggression in cross-cultural perspective. Behavior Science Research, 21(1–4), 70–100. doi:10.1177/106939718702100103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Dedden, L. A. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 7(3), 395–422. doi:10.1177/0265407590073006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (2013). The evolutionary psychology of women’s aggression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 368(1631), 20130078. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0078.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cashdan, E. (2003). Hormones and competitive aggression in women. Aggressive Behavior, 29(2), 107–115. doi:10.1002/ab.10041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobey, K. D., Klipping, C., & Buunk, A. P. (2013). Hormonal contraceptive use lowers female intrasexual competition in pair-bonded women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(4), 294–298. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Backer, C. J. S., Nelissen, M., & Fisher, M. L. (2007). Let’s talk about sex: A study on the recall of gossip about potential mates and sexual rivals. Sex Roles, 56(11), 781–791. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9237-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 309–330. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. L. (2004). Female intrasexual competition decreases female facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 271(Sup. 5), S283–S285. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. L., & Cox, A. (2009). The influence of female attractiveness on the effectiveness of competitor derogation. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(2), 141–155. doi:10.1556/JEP.7.2009.2.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. L., Shaw, S., Worth, K., Smith, L., & Reeve, C. (2010). How we view those who derogate: Perceptions of female competitor derogators. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 4(4), 265–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, M. E., Bas, O., Pagano, L. A., & Samson, L. (2012). The architecture of female competition: Derogation of a sexualized female news anchor. Evolution, Mind and Behaviour, 10(3), 107–133. doi:10.1556/JEP.10.2012.3.2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Gangestad, S. W., Perea, E. F., Shapiro, J. R., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009). Aggress to impress: Hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 980–994. doi:10.1037/a0013907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, N. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2006). Sex differences in indirect aggression: Psychological evidence from young adults. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(3), 231–245. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, G. P. (2014). From hitting to tattling to gossip: An evolutionary rationale for the development of indirect aggression. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(2), 343–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leenaars, L. S., Dane, A. V., & Marini, Z. A. (2008). Evolutionary perspective on indirect victimization in adolescence: The role of attractiveness, dating and sexual behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 34(4), 404–415. doi:10.1002/ab.20252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, C. A., Menter, C. G., Moggi-Cecchi, J., & Keyser, A. W. (2007). Extended male growth in a fossil Hominin species. Science, 318(5355), 1443–1446. doi:10.1126/science.1149211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piccoli, V., Foroni, F., & Carnaghi, A. (2013). Comparing group dehumanization and intra-sexual competition among normally ovulating women and hormonal contraceptive users. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(12), 1600–1609. doi:10.1177/0146167213499025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosvall, K. A. (2011). Intrasexual competition in females: Evidence for sexual selection? Behavioral Ecology, 22(6), 1131–1140. doi:10.1093/beheco/arr106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sear, R., Mace, R., & McGregor, I. A. (2000). Maternal grandmothers improve nutritional status and survival of children in rural Gambia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 267(1453), 1641–1647. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderani, S., Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Individual differences in mate poaching: An examination of hormonal, dispositional, and behavioral mate-value traits. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(4), 533–542. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9974-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 368(1631), 20130080. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0080.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt, T., & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37(6), 569–577. doi:10.1002/ab.20413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White, D. D., Gallup, A. C., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2010). Indirect peer aggression in adolescence and reproductive behavior. Evolutionary Psychology, 8(1), 49–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Arnocky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Arnocky, S. (2016). Intrasexual Rivalry Among Women. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1424-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1424-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics