Abstract
In string theory with S-dualities, there is an object-oriented realism and a structure-oriented realism. This paper discusses the advantages of “string structural realism”, a form of the latter, having a multi-aspected structure with a “model-oriented” pluralistic ontology, and grounded in the relation among fundamental objects of various string models.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
The philosophical literature about string theory is still dearth, but is growing rapidly. See Callender and Huggett (2001), Dawid (2006, 2007, 2009, 2013), Matsubara (2013), Muntean (2015), Rickles (2011, 2013, 2014), Taylor (1988), and Weingard (1988). This paper refers more often to work of D. Rickles and R. Dawid and ignores aspects of dualities important for theory-choice and theory-development.
- 4.
Coupling, as defined below, is not a energy scale or length/time scale, but a combination of two and many other aspects of strings.
- 5.
This section overlaps with Muntean (2015).
- 6.
The “intrinsic” string length is \(\ell_{S} = \sqrt{\alpha ^{{\prime}}}\), where α ′ is the Regge slope, which at its turn is the inverse of the string “tension” \(T = \frac{1} {2\pi \alpha ^{{\prime}}}\). As one expands the dynamics of a phenomenon in terms of α ′, one moves from a classical description to a stringy description of the phenomenon. Informally α ′ is a measure of the quantization of geometry and of its dynamical nature. g S is related to the topology of spacetime and the length ℓ s to the “size” of the spacetime.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
An extensive discussion on particle realism in quantum field theory is in Ch. 9 of French and Krause (2006).
- 10.
For an argument against this, see D. Baker’s analysis of the particle picture and the field picture of quantum field theory (Baker, 2009). In his view, none fares better.
- 11.
As closed strings always contain in their spectrum the graviton, this choice is not physically innocent: it corresponds to the fact that gravitational interaction is always present in the physical world.
- 12.
This is probably grist to the mill for “autonomous models” view of M. Morrison, N. Cartwright, etc. See Morgan and Morrison (1999).
References
Baker DJ (2009) Against field interpretations of quantum field theory. Br J Philos Sci 60(3):585–609
Baker DJ (2014) Does string theory posit extended simples?. Preprint available at: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/11053/
Becker K, Becker M, Schwarz JH (2007) String theory and M-theory. Cambridge University Press, New York
Callender C, Huggett N (eds) (2001) Physics meets philosophy at the Planck scale: contemporary theories in quantum gravity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cappelli A, Colomo F, Di Vecchia P, Castellani E (eds) (2012) The birth of string theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cartwright N (1999) The Dappled World: a study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Castellani E (2009) Dualities and intertheoretic relations. In: Suarez M, Dorato M, Redei M (eds) Launch of the European Philosophy of Science Association. Springer, Dordrecht
Chakravartty A (2007) A metaphysics for scientific realism: knowing the unobservable. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Da Costa NCA, French S (2003) Science and partial truth: a unitary approach to models and scientific reasoning. Oxford University Press, New York
Dawid R (2006) Underdetermination and theory succession from the perspective of string theory. Philos Sci 73(3):298
Dawid R (2007) Scientific realism in the age of string theory. Phys & Philos 11:1–35
Dawid R (2009) On the conflicting assessments of the current status of string theory. Philos Sci 76(5):984–996
Dawid R (2013) String theory and the scientific method. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
French S (1998) On the withering away of physical objects. In: Castellani E (ed) Interpreting bodies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 93–113
French S (2010) The interdependence of structure, objects and dependence. Synthese 175:89–109
French S (2014) The structure of the world: metaphysics and representation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
French S, Krause D (2006) Identity in physics: a historical, philosophical, and formal analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Frigg R, Votsis I (2011) Everything you always wanted to know about structural realism but were afraid to ask. Eur J Philos Sci 1(2):227–276
Greene B (1999) The elegant universe: superstrings, hidden dimensions, and the quest for the ultimate theory. W. W. Norton, New York.
Greene B (2011) The hidden reality: parallel universes and the deep laws of the cosmos. Knopf, New York
Hooft G (1974) Magnetic monopoles in unified gauge theories. Nucl Phys B 79(2):276–284
Hudson H (2005) The metaphysics of hyperspace. Oxford University Press, New York
Kim J (1998) Mind in a physical world an essay on the mind-body problem and mental causation. MIT, Cambridge
Ladyman J, Ross D, Spurrett D, Collier JG (2007) Every thing must go: metaphysics naturalized. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Matsubara K (2013) Realism, underdetermination and string theory dualities. Synthese 190(3):471–489
McDaniel K (2007) Extended simples. Philos Stud 133(1):131–141
McKenzie K (2011) Arguing against fundamentality. Stud Hist Philos Sci B: Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys 42(4):244–255
McKenzie K (2014) Priority and particle physics: ontic structural realism as a fundamentality thesis. Br J Philos Sci 65(2):353–380
Montonen C, Olive D (1977) Magnetic monopoles as gauge particles? Phys Lett B 72(1):117–120
Morgan MS, Morrison M (eds) (1999) Models as mediators: perspectives on natural and social science. Number 52 in ideas in context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Muntean I (2015, forthcoming) A metaphysics from string dualities: pluralism, fundamentalism, modality. In: Bigaj T, Wüthrich C (eds) Metaphysics in contemporary physics. Poznan studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities. Brill/Rodopi Amsterdam
Pincock C (2005) Overextending partial structures: idealization and abstraction. Philos Sci 72(5):1248–1259
Polchinski J (1996) String duality. Rev Mod Phys 68(4):1245–1258
Polchinski J (1998) String theory. Volume 2: superstring theory and beyond, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, New York
Psillos S (1999) Scientific realism: how science tracks truth. Routledge, London
Rickles D (2011) A philosopher looks at string dualities. Stud Hist Philos Sci B: Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys 42(1):54–67
Rickles D (2013) AdS/CFT duality and the emergence of spacetime. Stud Hist Philos Sci B: Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys 44(3):312–320
Rickles DP (2014) A brief history of string theory. From dual models to M-theory. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg
Sen A (1998) An introduction to non-perturbative string theory. arXiv:hep-th/9802051
Sklar L (2003) Dappled theories in a uniform world. Philos Sci 70(2):424–441
Taylor CC (1988) String theory, quantum gravity and locality. PSA: Proc Bienn Meet Philos Sci Assoc 1988:107–111
Teh NJ (2013) Holography and emergence. Stud Hist Philos Sci B: Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys 44(3):300–311
Teller P (1997) A metaphysics for contemporary field theories. Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys 28B(4):507–522
Teller P (2004) How we dapple the world. Philos Sci 71(4):425–447
Townsend P (1995) The eleven-dimensional supermembrane revisited. Phys Lett B 350(2):184–188
Wallace D, Timpson CG (2010) Quantum mechanics on spacetime i: spacetime state realism. Br J Philos Sci 61(4):697–727
Weingard R (1988) A philosopher looks at string theory. PSA: Proc Bienn Meet Philos Sci Assoc 2:95–106
Weisberg M (2007) Three kinds of idealization. J Philos 104(12):639–659
Witten E (1995) String theory dynamics in various dimensions. Nucl Phys B 443(1–2):85–126
Acknowledgements
Many thanks go to Jeremy Butterfield, Craig Callender, Antonio Cancio, Richard Dawid, Steven French, Jeffrey Harvey, Don Howard, Nick Huggett, Ken Intrilligator, James Maxin, Dean Rickles, for suggestions, comments and ideas that have morphed finally in this paper. I am indebted to the audience, the organizers and the referees of the Philosophy of Science Association meeting (Montreal, 2010), Structure and Identity workshop, (Bristol, 2012), the Bucharest Colloquium in Analytic Philosophy. New Directions in the Philosophy of Physics (2013). Last but not least, special acknowledgments to Ilie Pârvu and Iulian Toader for throughout suggestions and corrections that improved the quality of the argument. This material is complemented by a similar work on “string metaphysics” (Muntean, 2015), with several overlaps in form and content: thanks to the referee and editors of the Poznan Studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Muntean, I. (2015). Structural Pluralism and S-Dualities: A Project in String Realism. In: Pȃrvu, I., Sandu, G., Toader, I. (eds) Romanian Studies in Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 313. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16655-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16655-1_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16654-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16655-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)