Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Descriptive Analysis of Knowledge Management Research: Period from 1997 to 2012

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Knowledge Management

Part of the book series: Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning ((IAKM,volume 1))

Abstract

This paper reports a descriptive study of KM research and researchers based on articles published in four specialised academic journals in KM. For each published article, keyword and author analysis were used to discover the main contributors and dominant themes and topics examined. The study shows that KM research is grounded in both KM and non-KM theories, split equally between theoretical and empirical approaches and dominated by the interpretivist over positivist paradigm. So far, core KM elements (enablers, processes and stocks) have been explored more than the extended KM elements (contexts, drivers and outcomes). This might change in the future in order to remain relevant to practice. Published authors are distributed all over the world and tend to be collaborative, but not very productive contributors to KM journals. These findings need to be interpreted and applied with caution due to a number of limiting factors in research design and analysis. Future research is recommended to address these limitations and extend current research to a wider range of publication outlets and issues in KM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baruch, L. (2000). Knowledge management: Fad or need? Research Technology Management, 43(5), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, S., Regeer, B. J., Ho, W. W. S., & Zweekhorst, M. B. M. (2013). Proposing a fifth generation of knowledge management for development: Investigating convergence between knowledge management for development and transdisciplinary research. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 9(2), 10–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1993). Post-capitalist society. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durst, S., & Edvardsson, I. R. (2012). Knowledge management in SMEs: A literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(6), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, Y. K., Venkitachalam, K., Sharif, A. M., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2011). Research trends in knowledge management: Analyzing the past and predicting the future. Information Systems Management, 28, 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, M. (2001). Knowledge management strategies: Toward a taxonomy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., Handzic, M., Carlsson, S., & Nissen, M. (2003). Knowledge management research & practice: Visions and directions. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 1(1), 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epler, M., & Burkhard, R. (2007). Visual representations in knowledge management: Framework and cases. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4), 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Y. (2004). Global knowledge management research: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 61(2), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handzic, M. (2012). Surveying the field of KM: Evidence from KMR&P. Presentation at the first IAKM workshop, Padua, 16 Apr 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handzic, M., & Durmic, N. (2013). Mapping research community and interests in KM: A case of JKM. In Proceedings of the European conference on knowledge management (ECKM 2013), Kaunas, 5–6 Sept 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handzic, M., & Hasan, H. (2003). The search for an integrated KM framework, chapter 1. In H. Hasan & M. Handzic (Eds.), Australian studies in knowledge management (pp. 3–34). Wollongong: UOW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handzic, M., & Zhou, A. Z. (2005). Knowledge management: An integrative approach. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Handzic, M., Lagumdzija, A., & Celjo, A. (2008). Auditing knowledge management practices: Model and application. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 6(1), 90–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisig, P. (2009). Harmonisation of knowledge management – Comparing 160 KM frameworks around the globe. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(4), 4–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hislop, D. (2010). Knowledge management as an ephemeral management fashion? Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(6), 779–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple, C. W. (2003). Knowledge management handbook. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. R., & Chen, T. T. (2012). Revealing research themes and trends in knowledge management: From 1995 to 2010. Knowledge-Based Systems, 20, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z., & Yu, K.-H. (2010). Research paradigms of contemporary knowledge management studies: 1998–2007. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(2), 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, G. (2013). A tenth anniversary assessment of Davenport and Prusak (1998/2000) working knowledge: Practitioner approaches to knowledge in organisations. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 11(1), 10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribiere, V., & Walter, C. (2013). 10 years of KM theory and practices. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 11(1), 4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. G., & Te’eni, D. (2011). Encyclopedia of knowledge management (2nd ed.). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serenko, A. (2013). Meta-analysis of scientometric research of knowledge management: Discovering the identity of the discipline. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(5), 773–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2004). Meta review of knowledge management and intellectual capital literature: Citation impact and research productivity rankings. Knowledge and Process Management, 11(3), 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2009). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2013a). The intellectual core and impact of the knowledge management academic discipline. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(1), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2013b). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2013 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serenko, A., Bontis, N., Booker, L., Sadeddi, K., & Hardie, T. (2010). A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., & Preston, J. (1999). Knowledge management: The next fad to forget people? In 7th European conference on information systems, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venters, W. (2006). Knowledge management: The fad that forgot technology. In OLKC 2006 conference, University of Warwick, Coventry, 20–22 Mar 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, D. P. (2012). Authorship productivity in the knowledge management literature. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, D. P., Van Fleet, C., & Downs, L. J. (2011). The research core of the knowledge management literature. International Journal of Information Management, 31, 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is thankful to six PhD students from International Burch University, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, namely Zeynep Kara, Nermina Durmic, Dino Arnaut, Azizah bin Ibrahim, Tarik Kraljic and Adnan Kraljic for their assistance in extracting and coding data from source journals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Management Department, International Burch University, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Meliha Handzic

  2. Suleyman Sah University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Meliha Handzic

Authors
  1. Meliha Handzic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meliha Handzic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Management and Engineering, University of Padua, Vincenza, Italy

    Ettore Bolisani

  2. International Burch University, Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Suleyman Sah University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Meliha Handzic

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Handzic, M. (2015). A Descriptive Analysis of Knowledge Management Research: Period from 1997 to 2012. In: Bolisani, E., Handzic, M. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Management. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09501-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation