Abstract
The Roundtable on Environment and Sustainability was convened to provide academics and others with a collaborative forum in which to pursue their commitment to providing students with the tools needed to craft holistic strategies for meeting sustainability challenges. In the first effort of its kind, the Roundtable is developing a framework for designing, recognizing, and assessing academic programs that prepare students to engage in the holistic, adaptive management of the interactions of the systems at the human-environment interface needed to support both stewardship of the natural environment and long-term improvement in the quality of life for human individuals and communities. The Roundtable tentatively has identified as pedagogically optimal at least eight supradisciplinary skills, fourteen supradisciplinary perspectives on sustainability challenges, and twelve supradisciplinary contexts for applying the two. Revealing the complexity of the set of interactions among human and environmental systems is the most important pedagogical touchstone of the Roundtable’s approach. This revealed complexity is partly a function of the conceptual resolution of the interacting systems into sets of subsystems, and has at least five dimensions. Viewing sustainability challenges from the supradisciplinary perspectives helps students to acquire a holistic understanding of the set of interactions among systems crucial to meeting those challenges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As of this writing, the Roundtable has convened eight times since March 2009 at locations throughout North America. Reiter et al. (2011, 2012) offer comprehensive accounts of the Roundtable’s work through its seventh meeting in September 2011. This chapter summarizes the results of those earlier meetings, and offers a detailed account of the Roundtable’s subsequent work. Parts of this chapter have been summarized and adapted from the earlier publications. As a comparison of the earlier publications with this chapter will reveal, the Roundtable's name, the conceptual boundaries of the academic domain on which its work focuses, and the details of its approach to education within that domain have evolved over time.
References
Caldwell LK (1983) Environmental studies: discipline or metadiscipline? Environ Prof 5(3/4):247–259
Maniates MF, Whissel JC (2000) Environmental studies: the sky is not falling. Bioscience 50(6):509–517
Orr DW (1990) Environmental education and ecology literacy. Educ Dig 55(9):49–53
Reiter MA, Coggins PC, Howse ME (2009) Designing an integrated interdisciplinary environmental science curriculum using an IRMA chart: an example from Bethune-Cookman University. In: Leal Filho W (ed) Umweltbildung, Umweltkommunikation und Nachhaltigkeit [Environmental education, communication and sustainability]: vol 31: Sustainability at Universities: opportunities, challenges and trends. Peter Lang Scientific, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, pp 153–162
Reiter MA, Focht WJ, Barresi PA, Bumpous S, Smardon RC, Reiter KD (2011) Making education for sustainability work on your campus: the roundtables on environmental systems and sustainability. In: Leal Filho W (ed) Umweltbildung, Umweltkommunikation und Nachhaltigkeit [Environmental education, communication and sustainability]: vol 32. World trends in education for sustainable development. Peter Lang Scientific, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, pp 61–76
Reiter MA, Focht WJ, Barresi PA, Gill S, Smardon RC, Baker SL, Reiter KD, Fitch E, Rolfe T, Bumpous S (2012) Making education for sustainability work on campus: the proposals of the roundtable on environmental systems and sustainability. In: Leal Filho W (ed) Umweltbildung, Umweltkommunikation und Nachhaltigkeit [Environmental education, communication and sustainability]: vol 33. Sustainable development at Universities: New Horizons. Peter Lang Scientific, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, pp 109–116
Smardon RC (2011) Developing a national framework for internal/external review of undergraduate environmental studies/environmental science programmes. Interdisc Environ Rev 12(3):244–257
Soule ME, Press DE (1998) What is environmental studies? Bioscience 48(5):397–405
Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen P, McNeill J (2011) The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc 369(1938):842–867
Vincent S (2010) Interdisciplinary environmental education: an exploration of field identity and core competencies. National Council for Science and the Environment, Council of Environmental Deans and Directors, Washington, DC, 86Â p
Vincent S, Bunn S, Sloane L (2012) Interdisciplinary environmental and sustainability education on the Nation’s Campuses 2012: curriculum design. National Council for Science and the Environment, Council of Environmental Deans and Directors, Washington, DC, 59 p
Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman C, Mills SB (2011) Moving forward: on competence in sustainability research and problem solving. Environment 53(2):3–12
Wilke R (1995) Environmental literacy and the college curriculum: colleges and universities have a challenge to meet. EPA J 21(2):28–30
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barresi, P.A. et al. (2015). Revealing Complexity in Educating for Sustainability: An Update on the Work of the Roundtable on Environment and Sustainability. In: Leal Filho, W., Azeiteiro, U., Caeiro, S., Alves, F. (eds) Integrating Sustainability Thinking in Science and Engineering Curricula. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09474-8_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09474-8_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09473-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09474-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)