Skip to main content

Global Ethics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
  • 358 Accesses

Abstract

In this article various approaches to global ethics are outlined. Within the field of inquiry called global ethics, two senses of a “global ethic” are distinguished, and several theories presenting a global ethic or cosmopolitan ethic outlined. These are then contrasted to several alternative accounts – relativism, communitarianism, international skepticism, internationalism, and profit-based business ethics. Illustrations from bioethics issues are given at various points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bull, H. (1977). The anarchical society. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dower, N. (1998\2007). World ethics – The new agenda (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küng, H., & Kuschel, K.-J. (1993). A global ethic: The declaration of the Parliament of the World’s Religions. London: SCM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, A. (1992). What is a good international citizen? In P. Keal (Ed.), Ethics and foreign policy. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (1989). Faces of hunger. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B. (2005). Principles of a global ethic. In J. Eade & D. O’Byrne (Eds.), Global ethics and civil society. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, T. (2003). World poverty and human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue, H. (1996). Basic rights: Subsistence, affluence and US foreign policy (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1972). Famine, affluence and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, 229–243, and, extended, rich and poor. In Singer, P. (1979). Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D. B. (1984). Ethical relativism. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Brock, G. (2009). Global justice: A cosmopolitan account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caney, S. (2006). Justice beyond borders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, K. (2010). Global ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K.-C. (2004). Justice without borders: Cosmopolitanism, nationalism, and patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nigel Dower .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Dower, N. (2015). Global Ethics. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_446-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_446-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics