Skip to main content

Governance

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
  • 151 Accesses

Abstract

In the recent decades, the changing scene of social affairs, including the increasing emergence of markets and networks that in many cases substituted hierarchical institutions, such as states and governments, has led to increasing theoretical focus on governance as the process rather than government as the institution. The concept of governance recognizes all the role-players in managing social affairs, including governments, intergovernmental organizations, and nongovernmental and civil society actors. In the global scene, the concept of global governance has replaced the older concepts such as international relations or world order. Health-related affairs, also, have been a subject of global health governance at the global scale. The ethical principles that are relevant to global health governance are broader than the traditional sets of beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice. They include other principles such as equality, justice, and equity, respect for cultural diversity and pluralism, solidarity and cooperation, social responsibility and health, and sharing of benefits. The main challenges of global health governance, such as double standards, bilateralism, and exploitive research, can be theoretically and practically explored and solved with adherence to this more inclusive and comprehensive ethical perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (6th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. (2012). Governance: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • d’Empaire, G. (2009). Equality, justice and equity. In H. ten Have & M. S. Jean (Eds.), The UNESCO universal declaration on bioethics and human rights: Background, principles, and application (pp. 173–186). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, R., Lee, K., & Drager, N. (2002). Global health governance. London/Geneva: Department of Health and Development, World Health Organization.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elungu, A. (2009). Solidarity and cooperation. In H. ten Have & M. S. Jean (Eds.), The UNESCO universal declaration on bioethics and human rights: Background, principles, and application (pp. 211–218). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galjaard, H. (2009). Sharing of benefits. In H. ten Have & M. S. Jean (Eds.), The UNESCO universal declaration on bioethics and human rights: Background, principles, and application (pp. 231–242). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killen, J. Y., Jr. (2008). HIV research. In E. J. Emanuel, C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. K. Lie, F. G. Miller, & D. Wendler (Eds.), The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics (pp. 97–109). New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Pang, T. (2014). WHO: Retirement or reinvention? Public Health, 128(2), 119–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, R. (2008). Appropriate ethical standards. In E. J. Emanuel, C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. K. Lie, F. G. Miller, & D. Wendler (Eds.), The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics (pp. 711–718). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markel, H. (2014). Worldly approaches to global health: 1851 to the present. Public Health, 128(2), 124–128. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2013.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Palomo, A. (2009). Social responsibility and health. In H. ten Have & M. S. Jean (Eds.), The UNESCO universal declaration on bioethics and human rights: Background, principles, and application (pp. 219–230). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuura, K. (2009). Preface. In H. A. M. J. ten Have & M. S. Jean (Eds.), The UNESCO universal declaration on bioethics and human rights (pp. 9–10). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millum, J., Grady, C., Keusch, G., & Sina, B. (2013). Introduction: The Fogarty international research ethics education and curriculum development program in historical context. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(5), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revel, M. (2009). Respect for cultural diversity and pluralism. In H. ten Have & M. S. Jean (Eds.), The UNESCO universal declaration on bioethics and human rights: Background, principles, and application (pp. 199–210). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G. (2013). Global governance: Why? What? Whither? Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, N., Betts, A., Prantl, J., & Sridhar, D. (2013). Transforming global governance for the 21st century. UNDP-HDRO Occasional Papers (2013/09).

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chottray, V., & Stoker, G. (2010). Governance theory: A cross-disciplinary approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G., & Wilkinson, R. (2014). International organization and global governance. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youde, J. (2012). Global health governance. Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiarash Aramesh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Aramesh, K. (2015). Governance. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_217-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_217-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics