Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 987 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter studies the development and the evaluation of the land fragmentation model, LandFragmentS (Land Fragmentation System). The aim of this module is to quantify the existing situation of land fragmentation using a new index that measures the efficiency of the existing land tenure system and may assist planners in policy decision making, i.e. it can help to decide whether land consolidation should be applied. The chapter contains four main sections. Specifically, the first Sect. 7.2 presents significant aspects of model structure, namely, the methodology for developing the new index, the definition of land fragmentation factors involved in the model, a new method called ‘qualitative rating’ for assigning weights to factors and standardisation. Thereafter, the module interface is presented in Sect. 7.3 that sequentially follows all the steps for running the model, including the introduction of a new standardisation process called the ‘mean standardisation method’ (mSM). Then, a new ‘parcel shape index’ (PSI) is outlined in Sect. 7.4, which also includes a review of existing parcel shape indices. In Sect. 7.5, an application of the module is presented using a case study involving the investigation of four weighting scenarios, a comparison of the new index (GLFI) with existing indices, a sensitivity analysis focusing on changes to the weights and a comparison of the new PSI with existing indices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sharifi, A., Herwijnen, M., & Toorn, W. (2004). Spatial Decision Support Systems. Lecture Notes. ITC, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Keeney, R., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decision with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Easton, A. (1973). Complex managerial decisions involving multiple objectives. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beinat, E. (1997). Value functions for environmental management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Triantaphyllou, E. (1997). A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision making methods. Decision Sciences, 28(1), 151–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, Y., Yu, J., Shahbaz, K., & Xevi, E. (2009). A GIS-based sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights. In: Proceedings of 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, 13–17 July, Cairns, Australia. Available from URL: http://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim09/I2/chen_y.pdf.

  8. Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bodily, S. E. (1985). Modern decision making: a guide to modelling with decision support systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Simmons, A. J. (1964). An index of farm structure, with a Nottingahmsire example. East Midlands Geographer, 3, 255–261.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Januszewski, J. (1968). Index of land consolidation as a criterion of the degree of concentration. Geographia Polonica, 14, 291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ebdon, D. (1985). Statistics in Geography. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wong, D., & Lee, J. (2005). Statistical analysis of geographic information: With ArcView and ArcGIS. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tourino, J., Boullon, M., & Gonzalez, X. (2003). A GIS-embedded system to support land consolidation plans in Galicia. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17(4), 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Demetriou, D., Stillwell, J., & See, L. (2011). LandSpaCES: A spatial expert system for land consolidation. In S. Geertman, W. Reinhardt, & F. Toppen (Eds.), Advancing geoinformation science for a changing world (pp. 249–274). Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Pannell, D. (1997). Sensitivity analysis of normative economic models: Theoretical framework and practical strategies. Agricultural Economics, 16, 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Delgado, M. G., & Sendra, J. B. (2004). Sensitivity analysis in multi-criteria spatial decision making: A review. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An international Journal, 10(6), 1173–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boyce, R., & Clark, W. (1964). The concept of shape geography. Geographical Review, 54(4), 561–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, D., & Sallee, T. (1970). A method of measuring shape. Geographical Review, 60(4), 555–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. MacEachren, A. (1985). Compactness of geographic shape: comparison and evaluation of measures. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 67(1), 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Barnes, C. P. (1935). Economies of the long lot farm. Geographical Review, 25, 298–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, D., & Sallee, T. (1974). Theoretical patterns of farm shape and central place location. Journal of Regional Science, 14(3), 423–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson, H. B., (1976). Order upon the land: The U.S. rectangular land survey and the upper mississippi country. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Witney, B. (1995). Choosing and using farm machines. Edinburgh: Land Technology Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Landers, A. (2000). Resource management farm machinery: Selection, investment and management. Farming Press, Tonbridge.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gonzalez, X. P., Alvarez, C. J. & Crecente, R. (2004). Evaluation of land distributions with joint regard to plot size and shape. Agricultural Systems, 82, 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gonzalez, X. P., Marey, M. F., & Alvarez, C. J. (2007). Evaluation of productive rural land patterns with joint regard to the size, shape and dispersion of plots. Agricultural Systems, 92, 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Aslan, T., Gundogdu, K., & Arici, I. (2007). Some metric indices for the assessment of land consolidation projects. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10(9), 1390–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Amiama, C., Bueno, J., & Alvarez, C. J. (2008). Influence of the physical parameters of fields and the crop yield on the effective field capacity of a self-propelled forage harvester. Biosystems Engineering, 100, 198–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Libecap, G., & Lueck, D. (2009). The demarcation of land and the role of coordinating institutions. NBER (The National Bureau of Economic Research) Working Papers Series. Working Paper No. 14942.

    Google Scholar 

  31. McGarical, K. & Marks, B. J. (1995). FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report No PNW-GTR-351.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Krummel, J. R., Gardner, R. H., Sugihara, G., O’Neill, R. V., & Coleman, P. R. (1987). Landscape pattern in a disturbed environment. Oikos, 48, 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. O’Neill, R. V., Krummel, J. R., Gardner, R. H., Sugihara, G., Jackson, B., DeAngelis, D. L,, Milne, B. T., Turner, M. G., Zygmunt, B., Christensen, S. W., Dale, V. H., & Graham, R. L. (1988). Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 1, 153–62.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Milne, B. T., Turner, M. G., Zygmunt, B., Christensen, S. W., Dale, V. H., & Graham, R. L. (1988). Indices of landscape patterns. Landscape Ecology, 1(3), 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Milne, B. T. (1991). Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns. In M. G. Turner & R. H. Gardner (Eds.), Quantitative methods in landscape ecology (pp. 199–235). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Rutledge, D. (2003). Landscape indices as measures of the effects of fragmentation: Can pattern reflect process? DOC Internal Series 98. Wellington: Department of Conservation.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Coelho, C., Pinto, P. A., & Silva, M. (2001). A systems approach for the estimation of the effects of land consolidation projects (LCPs): A module and its application. Agricultural Systems, 68, 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bentley, W. (1987). Economic and ecological approaches to land fragmentation: In defence of a much-maligned phenomenon. Annual Review of Anthropology, 16, 31–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Heady, E. O., & Jensen, J. R. (1954). Farm management economies. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hagget, P. (1966). Locational analysis in human geography. St. Martin’s Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Demetris Demetriou .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Demetriou, D. (2014). LandFragmentS Model. In: The Development of an Integrated Planning and Decision Support System (IPDSS) for Land Consolidation. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02347-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics