Skip to main content

Comparing Manual vs Automatic Tuning of Differential Evolution Strategies for Energy Resource Management Optimization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Energy Informatics (EI.A 2023)

Abstract

The energy resource management problem in energy systems is hard to optimize, mainly due to non-linear restrictions and a large number of variables involved. This is partly because of the increased integration of distributed energy resources. Computational intelligence optimization techniques, namely evolutionary algorithms, are regarded as efficient techniques for identifying optimal and near-optimal solutions. However, these algorithms usually have in their design several parameters that need to be set and, in most cases, tuned for a given problem to find good solutions. This work proposes an automatic configuration approach of different differential evolution strategies using the irace package to solve a centralized day-ahead energy resource management problem. The problem considers an aggregator managing multiple resources, such as renewable generation, battery energy systems, electric vehicles, and loads with demand response capabilities. The aggregator aims to minimize operational costs and maximize revenues to obtain a profit. We compare the results of a “manual” tuning of parameters with the results obtained with the auto-tuned parameters using irace. Results show that the automatic configuration improves the profits of the aggregator in almost all strategies (except for DE/either-or-algorithm/1), getting the best results, an improvement of around 7%, with the automatically tuned DE/target-to-best/1 mutation strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yazdanie, M., Orehounig, K.: Advancing urban energy system planning and modeling approaches: gaps and solutions in perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 137, 110607 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Milford, J., Henrion, M., Hunter, C., Newes, E., Hughes, C., Baldwin, S.F.: Energy sector portfolio analysis with uncertainty. Appl. Energy 306, 117926 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hossain, M.A., Pota, H.R., Squartini, S., Abdou, A.F.: Modified PSO algorithm for real-time energy management in grid-connected microgrids. Renew. Energy 136, 746–757 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Soares, J., Pinto, T., Lezama, F., Morais, H.: Survey on complex optimization and simulation for the new power systems paradigm. Complexity 2018, 1–32 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Songyuan, Yu., Fang, F., Liu, Y., Liu, J.: Uncertainties of virtual power plant: problems and countermeasures. Appl. Energy 239, 454–470 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kazikova, A., Pluhacek, M., Senkerik, R.: Why tuning the control parameters of metaheuristic algorithms is so important for fair comparison? MENDEL 26(2), 9–16 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vieira, M., Faia, R., Lezama, F., Vale, Z.: A sensitivity analysis of PSO parameters solving the P2P electricity market problem. In: 2022 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 1–7, Padua, Italy, July (2022). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stützle, T., López-Ibáñez, M.: Automated design of metaheuristic algorithms. In: Gendreau, M., Potvin, J.-Y. (eds.) Handbook of Metaheuristics. ISORMS, vol. 272, pp. 541–579. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91086-4_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Birattari, M.: Tuning metaheuristics: a machine learning perspective. Tuning Metaheuristics 197, 221 (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Birattari, M., Stützle, T., Paquete, L., Varrentrapp, K.: A racing algorithm for configuring metaheuristics. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, GECCO 2002, pp. 11–18, San Francisco, CA, USA (2002). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yuan, Z., Stützle, T., Montes de Oca, M.A., Lau, H.C., Birattari, M.: An analysis of post-selection in automatic configuration. In: Proceeding of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference - GECCO 2013, pp. 1557, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2013). ACM Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Adenso-Díaz, B., Laguna, M.: Fine-tuning of algorithms using fractional experimental designs and local search. Oper. Res. 54(1), 99–114 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. López-Ibáñez, M., Dubois-Lacoste, J., Cáceres, L.P., Birattari, M., Stützle, T.: The irace package: iterated racing for automatic algorithm configuration. Oper. Res. Perspect. 3, 43–58 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huang, C., Li, Y., Yao, X.: A survey of automatic parameter tuning methods for metaheuristics. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 24(2), 201–216 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lezama, F., Sucar, E., de Cote, E.M., Soares, J., Vale, Z.: Differential evolution strategies for large-scale energy resource management in smart grids. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, pp. 1279–1286, Berlin Germany, July (2017). ACM

    Google Scholar 

  16. Soares, J., Ghazvini, M.A.F., Silva, M., Vale, Z.: Multi-dimensional signaling method for population-based metaheuristics: solving the large-scale scheduling problem in smart grids. Swarm Evol. Comput. 29, 13–32 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baran, M.E., Wu, F.F.: Network reconfiguration in distribution systems for loss reduction and load balancing. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 4(2), 1401–1407 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Soares, J., Canizes, B., Lobo, C., Vale, Z., Morais, H.: Electric vehicle scenario simulator tool for smart grid operators. Energies 5(6), 1881–1899 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present work has received funding from the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES) and through the FCT Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (2019.00141.CBM). José Almeida is supported by FCT with Ph.D. Grant 2022.09590.BD. João Soares has received funding from FCT, namely CEECIND/00420/2022. The authors acknowledge the work facilities and equipment provided by the GECAD research center (UIDB/00760/2020 and UIDP/00760/2020) to the project team.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Soares .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Almeida, J., Lezama, F., Soares, J., Vale, Z. (2024). Comparing Manual vs Automatic Tuning of Differential Evolution Strategies for Energy Resource Management Optimization. In: Jørgensen, B.N., da Silva, L.C.P., Ma, Z. (eds) Energy Informatics. EI.A 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14467. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48649-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48649-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48648-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48649-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics