Skip to main content

Climate and Fiscal Impacts from Reduced Fuel Use During COVID-19 Mitigation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pandemic in the Metropolis

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts on Transportation and Traffic ((STTT,volume 20))

  • 391 Accesses

Abstract

In U.S. states, as in most of the world, mitigation of the spread of COVID-19 was implemented by cities, counties, and governors’ offices through “shelter-in-place” (SIP) and “stay-at-home” orders and related actions (e.g., closure of non-essential businesses). There were several important impacts of government SIP orders on traffic volumes, which in turn had impacts on fuel use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In this chapter, I estimate GHG emissions and fuel tax revenue at the state and nation scales before, during, and after the SIP guidance. I find that due to approximately 50% reductions in estimated vehicle-miles traveled, U.S. GHG emissions that cause climate change were reduced by 4% in total and by 13% from transportation in the eight weeks after the SIP orders went into effect. This reduction put the United States on track to meet its annual goals for GHG reduction under the Paris Climate Accord. I also calculated that the rapid decline in travel resulted in savings of $5 billion/week to U.S. drivers and a loss of $0.7 billion/week in tax revenue to the states. These consequences should feature in future transportation and climate planning as important variables that may stochastically appear, and which are beyond the influence of transportation agencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See https://streetlightdata.com.

  2. 2.

    See https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gases-equivalencies-calculator-calculations-and-references.

  3. 3.

    See https://afdc.energy.gov/data/.

  4. 4.

    See https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB1.

  5. 5.

    See https://www.api.org/oil-and-natural-gas/consumer-information/motor-fuel-taxes/gasoline-tax.

  6. 6.

    See https://covid19.apple.com/mobility, accessed 6/7/2021.

  7. 7.

    See EPA (2017) https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gases-equivalencies-calculator-calculations-and-references.

  8. 8.

    The source of this data is USDOE, Alternative Fuels Data Center, https://afdc.energy.gov/data/.

  9. 9.

    See https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB1.

  10. 10.

    See https://www.api.org/~/media/Files/Statistics/StateMotorFuel-OnePagers-January-2020.pdf.

References

  1. Axsen J, Wolinet M (2020) Pricing it right for climate: using mobility pricing to drive down transport emissions in metro vancouver and montreal. David Suzuki Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bloom N (2020) How working from home works out. A Policy Paper of the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research

    Google Scholar 

  3. Compostella J, Fulton LM, De Klein R, Kim HC, Wallington TJ, Brown AL (2021) Travel time costs in the near-(circa 2020) and long-term (2030–2035) for automated, electrified, and shared mobility in the United States. Transp Policy 105(2021):153–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Handy S, Boarnet MG (2014) Impact of highway capacity and induced travel on passenger vehicle use and greenhouse gas emissions—Technical background document. California Air Resources Board. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2020-06/Impact_of_Highway_Capacity_and_Induced_Travel_on_Passenger_Vehicle_Use_and_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Policy_Brief.pdf

  5. Hasan MA, Frame DJ, Chapman R, Archie KM (2021) Costs and emissions: comparing electric and petrol-powered cars in New Zealand. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 90:102671

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hymel K (2019) If you build it, they will drive: measuring induced demand for vehicle travel in urban areas. Transp Policy 76:57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kazancoglu Y, Ozbiltekin-Pala M, Ozkan-Ozen YD (2021) Prediction and evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions for sustainable road transport within Europe. Sustain Cities Soc 70:102924

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kendall A, Ambrose H, Maroney E, Deng, H (2018) Program for vehicle regulatory reform: assessing life cycle-based greenhouse gas standards. Report of the National Center for Sustainable Transportation

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar P, Chakrabarty S (2020) Total cost of ownership analysis of the impact of vehicle usage on the economic viability of electric vehicles in India. Transp Res Rec 2674(11):563–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120947089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Le Quéré C, Jackson RB, Jones MW, Smith AJP, Abernethy S, Andrew RM,De-Gol AJ, Willis DR, Shan Y, Canadell JG, Friedlingstein P, Creutzig F, and Peters GP (2020) Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement. Nat Clim Change 10:647–653

    Google Scholar 

  11. Litman T (2020) Generated traffic and induced travel: implications for transport planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. https://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf

  12. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2021a) Accelerating decarbonization of the U.S. energy system. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/25932

  13. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2021b) An update on public transportation's impacts on greenhouse gas emissions. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/26103

  14. Tardivo A, Zanuy AC, Martın CS (2021) COVID-19 impact on transport: a paper from the railways’ systems research perspective. Transp Res Rec 2675(5):367–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198121990674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Uusitalo E, Kuokkanen A, Uusitalo V, von Wright T, Huttunen A (2021) Personal carbon trading in mobility may have positive distributional effects. Case Stud Transp Policy 9(1):315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fraser Shilling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shilling, F. (2023). Climate and Fiscal Impacts from Reduced Fuel Use During COVID-19 Mitigation. In: Loukaitou-Sideris, A., Bayen, A.M., Circella, G., Jayakrishnan, R. (eds) Pandemic in the Metropolis. Springer Tracts on Transportation and Traffic, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-00148-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-00148-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-00147-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-00148-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics