Skip to main content

Norwegian Gas in Europe in the 2020’s

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of Energy Consumption, Security and Natural Gas

Abstract

This article examines the factors that will influence the position of the Norwegian gas on the market in the 2020’s. Starting with an examination of the historical role of Norway as a gas supplier to the EU, this article maps the role of various factors in shaping framework conditions on the European gas market that can influence the position of the Norwegian gas as an energy source. The main conclusion is that Norway will remain an important supplier of gas until 2030 but may face some serious problems to remain relevant after this date due to possible depletion of gas deposits and increased EU focus on the negative impact of fossil fuels on climate change, the development of a more sustainable energy mix in Europe as well as the emergence of new gas suppliers to Europe, first and foremost LNG that could take higher share of the shrinking gas market in Europe. Development of the cost-effective large-scale carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology could alleviate some energy transition related pains and make gas more acceptable as a source of energy, also if the development of hydrogen economy were to materialise. The Norwegian gas could be turned into an important input in green hydrogen, a new promising energy source combining the best of the two energy worlds—the fossil one and the green one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Standard cubic metres of oil equivalents abbreviated as Sm3o.e. is a standard volume unit of petroleum products—for oil, it equals 6.29 barrels of oil, or 0.858 metric tonnes. For gas, it equals 1,000 m3 of natural gas.

  2. 2.

    Langeled is a 1,166-km-long pipeline constructed to carry gas from the Ormen Lange field in the Norwegian Sea to the UK with transport capacity of ca 72/75 mcm per day or ca 27 bcm per year.

  3. 3.

    The author’s calculations based on data from Norskpetroleum.no (2020c).

  4. 4.

    See IEA (2019) on the role of gas in energy transition.

References

  • Analiticheskii tsentr pri pravitelstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii. (2020a). Novaya konfiguratsiya gazovykh marshrutov v YeS. Energeticheskiy byulleten’(nr 81 February). 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Analiticheskii tsentr pri pravitelstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii. (2020b). Energostrategiya v epokhu peremen. Energeticheskiy byulleten’ (nr 85 June). 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Analiticheskii tsentr pri pravitelstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii. (2020c). Atomnaya energetika v yubileynyy god. Energeticheskiy byulleten’ (nr 88 September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S. S., & Sitter, N. (2019). The EU’s strategy towards external gas suppliers and their responses: Norway, Russia, Algeria and LNG. In J. M. Godzimirski (Ed.), New political economy of energy in Europe: Power to project, power to adapt (pp. 49–72). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Åslie, Ø. J. C., & Mansouri, M. (2020). Is petroleum activity in the marine areas of Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja desirable for Norway?—A case study in the oil and gas industry. INCOSE International Symposium, 30(1), 1280–1293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austvik, O. G. (2019). Norway: Small state in the great European energy game. In J. M. Godzimirski (Ed.), New political economy of energy in Europe: Power to project, power to adap (pp. 139–164). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Austvik, O. G., & Claes D. H. (2011). EØS-avtalen og norsk energipolitikk. Europautredningen. Utvalget for utredning av Norges avtaler med EU.

    Google Scholar 

  • BalticPipe. (2020). Baltic Pipe Project. https://www.baltic-pipe.eu/. Accessed 22 October 2020.

  • Barstad, S. (2016). Skipet med skifergass er dårlig nytt for Norges største næring. Aftenposten 27 September 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, S. M., Bennaceur, K., Cook, P., Davison, J., de Coninck, H., Farhat, K., Ramirez, A., Simbeck, D., Surles, T., Verma, D., Wright, J., & Ahearne, J. (2012). Carbon capture and storage. Global energy assessment—Toward a sustainable future (pp. 993–1068). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • BP. (2020). Statistical review of world energy 2020 (69th ed.). BP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenna, A. L. (2020a). Dette koster det å produsere strøm med norsk gass. https://enerwe.no/gass-gasspris-kommentar/dette-koster-det-a-produsere-strom-med-norsk-gass/351041. Accessed 12 October 2020.

  • Brenna, A. L. (2020b). Gassprisen tok seg kraftig opp i august. Prisen på gass traff bunnen i mai. https://enerwe.no/gass-gasspris/gassprisen-tok-seg-kraftig-opp-i-august/380048. Accessed 12 October 2020.

  • Dagbladet. (2018, November 30). EU med både godt og dårlig nytt for norsk gass.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2020a). Energy production and imports. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Energy_production_and_imports. Accessed 16 October 2020.

  • European Commission. (2020b). EU energy in figures. Statistical pocketbook 2020. European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2020c). A European Green Deal. Striving to be the first climate-neutral continent. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en. Accessed 12 January 2021.

  • European Commission. (2020d). A hydrogen strategy for a climate-neutral Europe. European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2020e). Methane emissions. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/oil-gas-and-coal/methane-emissions_en. Accessed 12 October 2020.

  • European Commission. (2020f). Quarterly Report on European Gas Market Q1 2020. European Commission. Market Observatory for Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2020). Database updated in October 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/. Accessed 12 January 2021.

  • Fischer, S. (2020). What Russia doesn’t get about Germany. Carnegie Moscow Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassco. (2020). Gassco. https://gassco.no/en/. Accessed 15 October 2020.

  • Gawlikowska-Fyk, A. (2019). Poland: Coping with the challenges of decarbonization and diversification. In J. M. Godzimirski (Ed.), New political economy of energy in Europe: Power to project, power to adapt (pp. 195–214). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gawlikowska-Fyk, A., Nowak, Z. & Puka, L. (2015). The EU gas game: Time to redefine the rules? Case studies of Russia and Norway and lessons for the EU, Norway and Poland (PISM Goodgov Report). PISM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazprom. (2020). Gazprom in figures 2015–2019 factbook. Gazprom. https://www.gazprom.com/f/posts/72/802627/gazprom-in-figures-2015-2019-en.pdf. Accessed 12 January 2021.

  • Gazprom Export. (2020). Foreign partners. Great Britain. http://www.gazpromexport.ru/en/partners/gb/. Accessed 12 June 2021.

  • Godzimirski, J. M. (2016). Can the Polish shale gas dog still bark? Politics and policy of unconventional hydrocarbons in Poland. Energy Research & Social Science, 158–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.06.009

  • Godzimirski, J. M. (2019). Channels of influence, or how non-members can influence EU energy policy. In J. M. Godzimirski (Ed.), New political economy of energy in Europe: Power to project, power to adapt (pp. 105–137). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Godzimirski, J. M., & Austvik, O. G. (2019). Introduction: The EU and the changing (geo)politics of energy in Europe. In J. M. Godzimirski (Ed.), New political economy of energy in Europe: Power to project, power to adapt (pp. 1–24). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Godzimirski, J. M., & Nowak, Z. (2018). EU gas supply security: The power of the importer. In K. Szulecki (Ed.), Energy security in Europe: Divergent perceptions and policy challenges (pp. 221–249). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. S. (2016). Climate change as a global security issue. Journal of Global Security Studies., 1(1), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogv010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldthau, A., & Sitter, N. (2019). Regulatory power or market power Europe? Leadership and models for external EU energy governance. In J. M. Godzimirski (Ed.), New political economy of energy in Europe: Power to project, power to adapt (pp. 27–47). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gullberg, A. T. (2013). The political feasibility of Norway as the ‘green battery’ of Europe. Energy Policy, 57, 615–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, T. (2020). The bridge: Natural gas in a redivided Europe. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2019). The role of gas in today’s energy transitions. International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2020a). Key world energy statistics 2020. International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2020b). World energy outlook 2020. International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimasøksmal. (2020). Outrage after judgement in favour of the Norwegian oil state. https://www.xn--klimasksml-95a8t.no/en/2020/12/22/outrage-after-judgement-in-favour-of-the-norwegian-oil-state/. Accessed 13 January 2021.

  • Korteweg, R. (2018). Energy as a tool of foreign policy of authoritarian states, in particular Russia. Policy Department for External Relations, Directorate General for External Policies of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, K.-O., & Westphal, K. (2017). Nord Stream 2—A political and economic contextualisation (SWP Research Paper). SWP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenta.ru. (2021). Tseny na gas dostigli maksimuma. https://lenta.ru/news/2021/01/11/gas/. Accessed 13 January 2021.

  • Luterbacher, U., & Sprinz, D. F. (Eds.). (2018). Global climate policy: actors, concepts, and enduring challenges. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mench, M. M. (2015). High hopes for hydrogen: Fuel cells and the future of energy. Foreign Affairs, 94, 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Energy Poland. (2019). Polityka eneregetyczna Polski do 2040. Ministry of Energy Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs Norway. (2012). Utenfor og innenfor: Norges avtaler med EU (Vol. NOU 2012:2). Ministry of Foreign Affairs Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naimski, P. (2015). Energia i niepodległość. Ośrodek Myśli Politycznej.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norskpetroleum.no. (2020a). Management of revenues. https://www.norskpetroleum.no/en/economy/management-of-revenues/. Accessed 20 October 2020.

  • Norskpetroleum.no. (2020b). Production forecasts. https://www.norskpetroleum.no/en/production-and-exports/production-forecasts/. Accessed 20 October 2020.

  • Norskpetroleum.no. (2020c). Resource accounts for the Norwegian shelf at 31.12.2019. https://www.norskpetroleum.no/en/petroleum-resources/resource-accounts/. Accessed 20 October 2020.

  • O’Sullivan, M., Overland, I., & Sandalow, D. (2017). The geopolitics of renewable energy (Working Paper). Columbia University Press, Harvard Kennedy School, NUPI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overland, I. (2019). EU climate and energy policy: New challenges for old energy suppliers. In J. M. Godzimirski (Ed.), New political economy of energy in Europe: Power to project, power to adapt (pp. 73–102). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sartor, O., Spencer, T., Bart, I., Julia, P.-E., Gawlikowska-Fyk, A., Neuhoff, K., Ruester, S., Selei, A., Toth, B., Szpor, A., & Tuerk, A. (2014). The EU’s 2030 climate and energy framework and energy security. Climate Strategies. https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/biblio/22376382

  • Schjøtt-Pedersen, K. E. (2016, February 27). Gass er Europas batteri. Dagens Næringsliv, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, D., & Bosman, R. (2016). The geopolitics of renewables; Exploring the political implications of renewable energy systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103(Supplement C), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.014

  • Shivakumar, A., Dobbins, A., Fahl, U., & Singh, A. (2019). Drivers of renewable energy deployment in the EU: An analysis of past trends and projections. Energy Strategy Reviews., 26, 100402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skjærseth, J. B. (2015). EU climate and energy policy: Demanded or supplied? In G. Bang, A. Underdal, & S. Andresen (Eds.), The domestic politics of global climate change: Key actors in international climate cooperation (pp. 71–94). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sørheim, T. I., & NTB. (2016). Gigantskip med skifergass fra USA inntar Norge. https://e24.no/naeringsliv/i/jPy10w/gigantskip-med-skifergass-fra-usa-inntar-norge. Accessed 21 October 2020.

  • SSB. (2019). Ettermiddagsbyger eller væromslag for norsk sokkel? SSB Analyse 31. https://www.ssb.no/energi-og-industri/artikler-og-publikasjoner/ettermiddagsbyger-eller-vaeromslag-for-norsk-sokkel. Accessed 12 January 2021.

  • Van de Graaf, T., & Colgan, J. D. (2017). Russian gas games or well-oiled conflict? Energy security and the 2014 Ukraine crisis. Energy Research & Social Science, 24, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volovik, N. (2020). Russia-EU trade development under the sanctions. Baltic Rim Economies. https://sites.utu.fi/bre/russia-eu-trade-development-under-the-sanctions/. Accessed 10 December 2020.

  • Westphal, K. (2019). Germany’s energiewende: Climate change in focus—Competitiveness and energy security sidelined? In J. M. Godzimirski (Ed.), New political economy of energy in Europe: Power to project, power to adap (pp. 165–194). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, K. (2020). German-Russian gas relations in face of the energy transition. Russian Journal of Economics, 6(4), 406–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, K., Bros, A., & Mitrova, T. (2017). German-Russian gas relations: A special relationship in troubled waters (Vol. 2017/RP 13).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization (WTO). (2010). World trade report 2010. Trade in natural resources. World Trade Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakub M. Godzimirski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Godzimirski, J.M. (2022). Norwegian Gas in Europe in the 2020’s. In: Liuhto, K. (eds) The Future of Energy Consumption, Security and Natural Gas. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80367-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80367-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80366-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80367-4

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics