Skip to main content

Improving Nature of Science Instruction in Elementary Classrooms with Modified Trade Books and Educative Curriculum Materials

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nature of Science in Science Instruction

Abstract

This chapter describes a strategy for teaching about nature of science (NOS) in elementary grades through read-alouds with science trade books that have been modified to include explicit references to NOS. Teaching NOS has historically been difficult for teachers across grade levels. Research shows that even secondary teachers with a strong science background, an informed understanding of NOS, and the desire to teach NOS still struggle with effectively teaching NOS in their classrooms (Wahbeh and Abd-El-Khalick 2014). This issue is compounded for instructors at the elementary level because these teachers typically do not have adequate, let alone robust, science content knowledge and are not science specialists (Banilower et al. 2013). Still, it is especially important that NOS is addressed in elementary grades because by the time students reach the older grades, they will already have developed naïve NOS views (see Abd-El-Khalick and Lederman 2000; Lederman 1992; and Lederman and Lederman 2014 for reviews). In the absence of explicit NOS instruction, naive conceptions of NOS are learned incidentally through representations of NOS in textbooks (Abd-El-Khalick et al. 2008) and trade books (Brunner and Abd-El-Khalick 2017), language use in science classes (Lemke 1990), and even popular media (Aikenhead 1988; Walls 2012). Thus, there is a need for strategies that help elementary teachers develop more informed views of NOS, as well as supporting them in implementing effective NOS teaching practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Images of nature of science in middle grade science trade books. New Advocate, 15(2), 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A.–. P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 835–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. (1988). An analysis of four ways of assessing student beliefs about STS topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 607–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (2005). “How should I know what scientists do?—I am just a kid”: Fourth-grade students’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 653–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V., Nargund-Joshi, V., Weiland, I., Pongsanon, K., & Avsar, B. (2014). What third-grade students of differing ability levels learn about nature of science after a year of instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 244–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25, 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill: Horizon Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, J. L. (2016). Enriching science trade books with explicit-reflective nature of science instruction: Impacting elementary teachers’ practice and improving students’ learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, J. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2017). Representations of nature of science in U. S. elementary trade books. In C. V. McDonald & F. Abd-El-Khalick (Eds.), Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks: A global perspective (pp. 135–151). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Daisey, P. (1994). The value of trade books in secondary science and mathematics instruction: A rationale. School Science and Mathematics, 94, 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. J. (2006). Representations of science within children’s trade books. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 214–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, G. (2007). Galaxies, Galaxies! New York: Holiday House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. B. (2018). An analysis of award-winning science trade books for children: Who are the scientists, and what is science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 1188–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth-graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lead States, N. G. S. S. (2013). The next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, J. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2004, April). Early elementary students’ and teacher’s understandings of nature of science and scientific inquiry: Lessons learned from Project ICAN. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, BC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (Vol. 2, pp. 600–620). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Westport: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, L. (2010). Come see the Earth turn: The story of Léon Foucault. Berkley: Tricycle Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahbeh, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2014). Revisiting the translation of nature of science understandings into instructional practice: Teachers’ nature of science pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 425–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls, L. (2012). Third grade African American students’ views of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarnowski, M., & Turkel, S. (2013). How nonfiction reveals the nature of science. Children’s Literature in Education, 44, 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeanne L. Brunner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brunner, J.L., Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2020). Improving Nature of Science Instruction in Elementary Classrooms with Modified Trade Books and Educative Curriculum Materials. In: McComas, W.F. (eds) Nature of Science in Science Instruction. Science: Philosophy, History and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57238-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57239-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics