Abstract
Climate change represents a multilevel challenge, simultaneously relating to the local and global scales. National governments are key actors in developing climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Brazil, China and Mozambique are cases where climate risks may deepen vulnerabilities and undermine development prospects. This chapter presents an analysis of key climate change strategies and action in Brazil, China and Mozambique since the 1970s, when the environmental issue emerged onto the world political agenda following the 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm. Our analysis focuses on the institutional arrangements and political strategies that have emerged since then in Brazil, China and Mozambique and how these countries have addressed the climate issue in their political processes until 2019. Our results show that both Brazil and China have focused much of their efforts on mitigating actions, that is, the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Their climate agenda is motivated by treating climate risk in this way, while the adaptation agenda is incipient in these countries. On the other hand, in Mozambique, political action on climate change is largely based on the need to respond to the risks and disasters that are intensified by these changes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrahamsson, H., & Nilsson, A. (1995). Mozambique: The Troubled Transition: from Socialist Construction to Free Market Capitalism. London/Atlantic Highlands: Zed Books.
Amaral, G. A. (2014). O Processo de Institucionalização da Questão Ambiental em Moçambique 1980–2000. MSc Dissertation, Universidade Federal Fluminense.
Amaral, G. A. (2018). Mudanças Ambientais, Percepções de Risco e Estratégia de Adaptação aos Eventos Extremos em Moçambique: Estudo de Caso em Machanga. PhD Thesis, UNICAMP.
Artaxo, P. (2014). Uma Nova era Geológica em Nosso Planeta: O Antropoceno? Revista USP, 103, 13–24.
Barbi, F., Mozzer, G. B., Martins, R. D., & Ferreira, L. C. (2015). Mudanças Climáticas na Rio+20: Uma Reflexão sobre os 20 Anos de Negociações Climáticas no Brasil. In F. Castro & C. Futemma (Eds.), Governança Ambiental no Brasil: Entre o Socioambientalismo e a Economia Verde (pp. 53–83). Jundiaí: Pacco Editorial.
Basso, L., & Viola, E. (2014). O Progresso da Política Energética Chinesa e os Desafios na Transição para o Desenvolvimento de Baixo Carbono, 2006–2013. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 57, 174–192.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Beck, U. (1995). Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beck, U. (2000). Risk Society Revisited: Theory, Politics and Research Programmes. In B. Adam, U. Beck, & J. V. Loon (Eds.), The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory (pp. 211–229). London: Sage.
Beck, U. (2009). World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (2010). Climate for Change, or How to Create a Green Modernity? Theory, Culture and Society, 27(2–3), 254–266.
Biermann, F., et al. (2012). Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving Earth System Governance. Science, 335(6074), 1306–1307.
Boden, T. A., Marland, G., & Andres, R. J. (2015). Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/overview_2011.html. Accessed 15 Feb 2020.
Brasil. (2009, December 29). Lei n° 12.187, de 29 de dezembro de 2009. Institui a Política Nacional sobre Mudança do Clima – PNMC. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, DF, n° 248, S. 1, p. 109.
Bulkeley, H. (2001). Governing Climate Change: The Politics of Risk Society? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(4), 430–447.
Bulkeley, H., & Kern, K. (2006). Local Government and the Governing of Climate Change in Germany and the UK. Urban Studies, 43(12), 2237–2259.
Bulkeley, H., & Newell, P. (2010). Governing Climate Change. New York: Routledge.
Chan, C. K., & Yao, X. (2008). Air Pollution in Mega Cities in China. Atmospheric Environment, 42(1), 1–42.
Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The “Anthropocene”. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17.
Di Giulio, G. M., Bedran-Martins, A. M., da Vasconcellos, M., & Ribeiro, W. C. (2017). Mudanças Climáticas, Riscos e Adaptação na Megacidade de São Paulo, Brasil. Sustentabilidade em Debate, 8(2), 75.
Dunlap, R., & Brulle, R. (2015). Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research). (2017). Fossil CO2 & GHG Emissions of All World Countries, 2017. http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=CO2andGHG1970-2016. Accessed 27 Feb 2019.
Ferreira, L. C. (2018). The Sociology of Environmental Issues: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Curitiba: CRV.
Ferreira, L. C., & Tavolaro, S. B. F. (2008). Environmental Concerns in Contemporary Brazil: An Insight into Some Theoretical and Societal Backgrounds (1970s–1990s). International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 19(3–4), 161–177.
Giddens, A. (1991). As Consequências da Modernidade. São Paulo: UNESP.
Giddens, A. (2005). Mundo em Descontrole: O Que a Globalização Está Fazendo de Nós. Rio de Janeiro: Record.
Giddens, A. (2009). The Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Huang, X., Zhao, D., Brown, C. G., & Wu, Y. (2010). Environmental Issues and Policy Priorities in China: A Content Analysis of Government Documents. China: An International Journal, 8(2), 220–246.
Hung, M., & Tsai, T. C. (2012). Dilemma of Choice: China’s Response to Climate Change. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 55(Special Edition), 104–124.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. In R. K. Pachauri & A. Reisinger (Eds.), Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISSC and UNESCO. (2013). World Social Science Report 2013, Changing Global Environments. Paris: OECD and UNESCO.
Itamaraty. (2015). Pretendida Contribuição Nacionalmente Determinada (iNDC) para a Consecução do Objetivo da Convenção-Quadro das nações Unidas sobre Mudança do Clima. http://www.itamaraty.gov.br/images/ed_desenvsust/BRASIL-iNDC-portugues.pdf. Accessed 6 Mar 2019.
Jacobi, P., & Sulaiman, S. (2016). Governança Ambiental Urbana em Face das Mudanças Climáticas. Revista USP, 109, 133–142.
Macbean, A. (2007). China’s Environment: Problems and Policies. The World Economy, 30(2), 292–307.
MICOA (Ministério para a Coordenação Ambiental). (1996). Programa Nacional de Gestão Ambiental. Maputo.
Monjane, B. (2015, December 10). Moçambique e o Desastre do Novo Acordo Climático de Paris. Pressenza International Press Agency. www.pressenza.com/pt-pt/2015/12/mocambique-e-o-desastre-do-novo-acordo-climatico-de-paris. Accessed 27 Feb 2019.
Moreira, H. M., & Ribeiro, W. C. (2016). A China na Ordem Ambiental Internacional das Mudanças Climáticas. Estudos Avançados, 30(87), 213–234.
Muhale, I. J. (2018). O Papel da Produção Científica na Institucionalização da Política Ambiental em Moçambique: 1980–2014. PhD Thesis, USP.
OC. (2018). Análise das Emissões Brasileiras de Gases de Efeito Estufa e suas Implicações para as Metas do Brasil. Observatório do Clima.
Oliveira, A. P. (2011). A China Abraça a Causa Verde. In A. Moreira & P. Ramalho (Eds.), Estratégia (pp. 55–68). Lisboa: Instituto Português da Conjuntura Estratégica.
Osório, C. (2010). Gênero e Democracia: As Eleições de 2009 em Moçambique. Maputo: WLSA Moçambique.
PBMC (Painel Brasileiro de Mudanças Climáticas). (2013). Base Científica das Mudanças Climáticas (Primeiro Relatório de Avaliação Nacional, vol. 1). Rio de Janeiro: PBMC.
PRC (Popular Republic of China). (2015). Enhanced Actions on Climate Change: China’s Intended Nationally Determined Contributions. www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/China/1/China's%20INDC%20-%20on%2030%20June%202015.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 2019.
Renn, O., & Klinke, A. (2015). Risk Governance and Resilience: New Approaches to Cope with Uncertainty and Ambiguity. In U. Fra Paleo (Ed.), Risk Governance: The Articulation of Hazard, Politics and Ecology (pp. 19–41). Dordrecht: Springer.
Rockström, J., et al. (2009). Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.
Sedrez, L. (2002). Historia Ambiental de América Latina: Origen, principales interrogantes y lagunas. In G. Palacio & A. Ulloa (Eds.), Repensando la Naturaleza: Encuentros y Desencuentros Disciplinarios en Torno a lo Ambiental (pp. 99–109). Bogota: Universidad Nacional de Colombia – Sede Leticia/Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Imani/Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia/Conciencias.
Serra, C. M. (2012). Quadro Jurídico-ambiental em Moçambique: Pontos Fortes, Constrangimentos e Desafios. In C. M. Serra, D. Dondeyne, & T. Durang (Eds.), O Meio Ambiente em Moçambique: Notas para a Reflexão sobre a Situação Atual e os Desafios para o Futuro (pp. 11–34). Maputo: Governent Report.
Serra Júnior, C. (Ed.). (2003). Coletânea de Legislação do Ambiente. Maputo: CIEDIMA.
Spring, U. O. (2016). Perspectives of Global Environmental Change in the Anthropocene. In G. Sosa-Nunez & E. Atkins (Eds.), Environment, Climate Change and International Relations (pp. 29–41). Bristol: E-International Relations.
Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., & Mcneill, J. (2011). The Anthropocene: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369, 842–867.
Stuenkel, O. (2018). O Mundo Pós- Ocidental: Potências Emergentes e a Nova Ordem Global. Rio de Janeito: Ed. Zahar.
Syvitski, J. P. M., & Kettner, A. (2011). Sediment Flux and the Anthropocene. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369, 957–975.
Viola, E., Franchini, M., & Ribeiro, T. L. (2013). Sistema Internacional de Hegemonia Conservadora: Governança Global e Democracia na Era da Crise Climática. São Paulo: Annablume.
Will, S., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., & Mcneill, J. (2011). The Anthropocene: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369(1), 842–867.
World Bank. (2010). Relatório sobre o Desenvolvimento Mundial de 2010: Desenvolvimento e Mudança Climática. Washington, DC.
Xie, L. (2011). China’s Environmental Activism in the Age of Globalization. Asian Politics & Policy, 3(2), 207–224.
Young, O., et al. (2006). The Globalization of Socio-ecological Systems: An Agenda for Scientific Research. Global Environmental Change, 16, 304–316.
Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Haywood, A., & Ellis, M. (2011). The Anthropocene: A New Epoch of Geological Time? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369(1), 835–841.
Zehr, S. (2015). The Sociology of Global Climate Change. WIREs Climate Change, 6, 129–150.
Zolho, R. (2010). Mudanças Climáticas e as Florestas em Moçambique. Maputo: Centro de Integridade Pública Moçambique.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ferreira, L., Barbi, F., Barbieri, M.D. (2021). What Do We Want to Be When We Grow Up? The Political Dimensions of Climate Change in Brazil, China and Mozambique. In: Ioris, A.A.R. (eds) Environment and Development . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55416-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55416-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55415-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55416-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)