Abstract
Is economic growth and development a zero-sum game vis-à-vis the environment: i.e. must economic welfare always come at the cost of environmental damage? This is one of the most fundamental questions facing humanity today – whether there is a way for both the economy and the environment to flourish, or if we must always make trade-offs between what’s best for each. Avoiding knee-jerk reactions wholly in favor of either side is important for society, as evidenced by the disorder experienced in several countries around the world at the hands of self-declared guardians of the environment. The fact is that climate change is not limited to a national boundary but is tied to international actions and reactions. While the price an economy pays for a sustainable future is purely a local price, the social costs resulting from environmental damage is shared globally. Hence, even if a government completely capitulated to the environmental extremists’ demands, there would still be environmental impacts to mitigate. In addition to developing energy policies to reduce carbon emissions, policymakers must act to prepare their economies to deal with climate change. Can energy policies be designed to simultaneously provide social and environmental benefits? The answer is an emphatic yes. This chapter shares examples of a select subset of countries, reviewing their climate change agendas and targets, in conjunction with supporting environmental policies. Specifically, the economic impacts of such measures, and the long-term impacts of such policies on energy supply and demand, are assessed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aden N (2016) The roads to decoupling: 21 countries are reducing carbon emissions while growing GDP. Retrieved from World Resources Institute website: https://www.wri.org/blog/2016/04/roads-decoupling-21-countries-are-reducing-carbon-emissions-while-growing-gdp
Beckerman W (1992) The environment as a commodity. Nature 357(6377):371–372
Carbon Neutrality Coalition (2018, August 21) The declaration of the carbon neutrality coalition. Retrieved from https://www.carbon-neutrality.global/the-declaration/
Dow K, Downing T (2011) The atlas of climate change. Earthscan, Brighton
DRC, & OECD (2017) Industrial upgrading for green growth in China. Retrieved from OECD website: https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/Industrial_Upgrading_China_June_2017.pdf
Fankhauser S, Gennaioli C, Collins M (2015) The political economy of passing climate change legislation: evidence from a survey. Glob Environ Chang 35:52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.008
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2018) The State of the World’s Forests (SOFO). Retrieved from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations website: http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/I9535EN. isbn 978-92-5-130561-4
Grossman G. M, & Krueger A. B (1991) Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement (3914). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914
Herweijer C, Sura K, Davies M, Gilbert M (2019) The low carbon economy index 2019. Retrieved from Price Waterhouse Coopers website: https://www.pwc.co.uk/services/sustainability-climate-change/insights/low-carbon-economy-index.html
KAPSARC (2017) Energy dialogue 2016. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Kern M (2019) $100 oil? Drone strikes halt half of Saudi crude production. Retrieved from https://oilprice.com/Geopolitics/International/100-Oil-Drone-Strikes-Halt-Half-Of-Saudi-Crude-Production.htm
Kuyper J, Schroeder H, Linnér B (2018) The evolution of the UNFCCC. Annu Rev Environ Resour 43(1):343–368. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-030119
Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45(1):1–28
Nachmany M, Fankhauser S, Setzer J (2017) Global trends in climate change legislation and litigation, 2017 update. Retrieved from Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment website: http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Global-trends-in-climate-change-legislation-and-litigation-WEB.pdf
Norton A (2018) Trailblazing UK climate change act is a model for the world. Climate Home News. Retrieved from https://www.climatechangenews.com/2018/11/26/uk-climate-change-act-model-world/
OECD (2019) Green growth and sustainable development. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/
Ogden C (2019) UK’s Longest Ever Coal-free Run Comes to an End. Environment Journal. Retrieved from https://environmentjournal.online/articles/uks-longest-ever-coal-free-run-comes-to-an-end/
Ostman A (2019) Climate finance and initiatives (Brief). Retrieved from World Bank website: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/climatechange/brief/world-bank-carbon-funds-facilities
Tosun J, Jordan A, Maor M (2017) Governing climate change: the (dis)proportionality of policy responses. J Environ Policy Plan 19(6):596–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2017.1354451
UNFCCC (2019) Cooperation with the IPCC. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/topics/science/workstreams/cooperation-with-the-ipcc
World Nuclear Association (2017) Policy responses to climate change. Retrieved from https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/energy-and-the-environment/policy-responses-to-climate-change.aspx
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dubey, K. (2020). Energy Policy and Climate Change. In: Qudrat-Ullah, H., Asif, M. (eds) Dynamics of Energy, Environment and Economy. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 77. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43578-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43578-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43577-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43578-3
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)