Skip to main content

Adaptive Capacity of EU Transboundary Water Governance: The Dynamic Dimension of Resilience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
European Water Law and Hydropolitics

Part of the book series: Water Governance - Concepts, Methods, and Practice ((WGCMP))

  • 639 Accesses

Abstract

The system of transboundary water governance within the European Union displays a number of important vulnerabilities, such as the almost complete lack of water quantity management and allocation considerations, limited tools for the management of hydrological variability and restricted access to adequate dispute resolution mechanisms. The likelihood of conflict would, however, be significantly reduced or even eliminated, if the existing governance regime could be flexibly adjusted to emerging hydrological and political pressures. The adaptive capacity of EU transboundary water governance is assessed through a number of established resilience indicators such as coordination among the different levels and actors, transfer of information and feedback, and the authority and flexibility in decision-making and problem-solving. Such analysis shows that existing hydropolitical vulnerabilities are likely to persist as the rigid EU legal framework, coupled with a number of political and cultural obstacles, does not allow the dynamic adaptation of EU water policy objectives and measures to changes in basin hydrology and co-riparian politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and Lakes, Helsinki, 17 March 1992.

  2. 2.

    The relevant meeting documents available at: https://www.unece.org/environmental-policy/conventions/water/envwatermeetings.html#/ (accessed 12 February 2019).

  3. 3.

    https://www.unece.org/env/water/npd.html (accessed 12 February 2019).

  4. 4.

    http://www.unece.org/index.php?id=45241 (accessed 12 February 2019).

  5. 5.

    http://www.unece.org/env/water/workshop_joint_bodies_2013.html, http://www.unece.org/env/water/joint_bodies_workshop_2014.html (accessed 12 February 2019).

  6. 6.

    https://www.icpdr.org/main/activities-projects/dablas (accessed 12 February 2019).

  7. 7.

    https://www.icpdr.org/main/activities-projects/icpdr-eu-strategy-danube-region (accessed 12 February 2019).

  8. 8.

    Protocol on Water and Health to the 1992 Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes, London, 17 June 1999.

  9. 9.

    https://www.unece.org/env/water/protocol_third_reporting_cycle.html (accessed 12 February 2019).

  10. 10.

    https://water.europa.eu/freshwater (accessed 12 February 2019).

References

  • Baranyai G (2015) The water convention and the European Union: the benefits of the convention for EU member states. In: Tanzi A et al (eds) The UNECE convention on the protection and use of transboundary watercourses and international lakes—its contribution to International Water Cooperation. Leiden, Boston, pp 88–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardini F (2015) The normative and institutional evolution of the convention. In: Tanzi A et al (eds) The UNECE convention on the protection and use of transboundary watercourses and international lakes—its contribution to International Water Cooperation. Leiden, Boston, Brill Nijhoff, pp 32–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosens B (2010) Transboundary river governance in the face of uncertainty: resilience theory and the Columbia River Treaty. J Land Resour Environ Law 30:229–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Garmestani A, Benson M (2013) A framework for resilience-based governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 18(1):9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green O, Garmestani A, van Rijswick H, Keessen A (2013) EU water governance: striking the right balance between regulatory flexibility and enforcement? Ecol Soc 18(2):10–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J, Termeer C, Klostermann J, Meijerink D, van den Brink M, Jong P, Nooteboom S, Bergsma E (2010) The adaptive capacity wheel: a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environ Sci Policy 13:459–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill M (2013) Adaptive capacity of water governance: cases from the Alps and the Andes. Mt Res Dev 33(3):248–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jekel H (2015) Integrated water resources management as a tool to prevent or mitigate transboundary impact. In: Tanzi G et al (eds) The UNECE convention on the protection and use of transboundary watercourses and international lakes—its contribution to international water cooperation. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, Boston, pp 228–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood M, Raymond C, Oczkowski E, Morrison M (2015) Measuring the dimensions of adaptive capacity: a psychometric approach. Ecol Soc 20(1):37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 19:354–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szabó M (2008) The Mox plant case: the way towards Euro-chauvinism? In: G Bándi (ed) The impact of ECJ jurisprudence on environmental law. Szent István Társulat, Budapest, pp 143–166

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe) (2001) UNECE report on the workshop on approaches and tools for river basin management: experience drawn from the implementation of the EU water framework directive. MP.WAT/WG.1/2001/8

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe) (2013) Guide to implementing the water convention. Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe) (2015) Decision VII/1 on reporting under the convention. ECE/MP.WAT/49/Add.2

    Google Scholar 

Treaties

  • Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Rome, 25 March 1957

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and Lakes, Helsinki, 17 March 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • Protocol on Water and Health to the 1992 Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes, London, 17 June 1999

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gábor Baranyai .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Baranyai, G. (2020). Adaptive Capacity of EU Transboundary Water Governance: The Dynamic Dimension of Resilience. In: European Water Law and Hydropolitics. Water Governance - Concepts, Methods, and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22541-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics