Skip to main content

Nutrition entérale: surveillance et complications

  • Chapter
Traité de nutrition artificielle de l’adulte

Abstrait

Les avantages de la nutrition entérale (NE) sur la nutrition parentérale sont actuellement bien démontrés: aussi efficace, moins onéreuse, elle entraîne un bénéfice trophique sur la muqueuse digestive en augmentant les capacités ďabsorption et de barrière digestive. Bien que la sécurité de la NE soit reconnue, il persiste des complications. Les premières ďentre elles par leur gravité potentielle sont les pneumonies. La diarrhée est la complication de la NE la plus fréquente. Le respect des bonnes pratiques cliniques et des recommandations pourrait permettre de diminuer les complications au cours de la NE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Long CL, Schaffel N, Geiger JW et al. (1979) Metabolic response to injury and illness: estimation of energy and protein needs from indirect calorimetry and nitrogen balance. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 3: 452–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Roza AM, Shizgal HM (1984) The Harris Benedict equation reevaluated: resting energy requirements and the body cell mass. Am J Clin Nutr 40: 168–82

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. De Jonghe B, Appere-De-Vechi C, Fournier M et al. (2001) A prospective survey of nutritional support practices in intensive care unit patients: what is prescribed? What is delivered? Crit Care Med 29: 8–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thuong M, Leteurtre S (2003) Recommandations des experts de la Société de Réanimation de Langue Française: nutrition entérale en réanimation. Réanimation 12: 350–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonten MJ, Gaillard CA, van Tiel FH et al. (1994) The stomach is not a source for colonization of the upper respiratory tract and pneumonia in ICU patients. Chest 105: 878–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Adam S, Batson S (1997) A study of problems associated with the delivery of enteral feed in critically ill patients in five ICUs in the UK. Intensive Care Med 23: 261–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barr J, Hecht M, Flavin KE et al. (2004) Outcomes in critically ill patients before and after the implementation of an evidence-based nutritional management protocol. Chest 125: 1446–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Day A et al. (2004) Validation of the Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients: results of a prospective observational study. Crit Care Med 32: 2260–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bleichner G, Lesourd B, Françoise S (1997) Pratiques hospitalières en nutrition entérale: enquête ďopinion. Analyse des réponses de 598 cliniciens. Nutr Clin Metabol 11: 19–25

    Google Scholar 

  10. Preiser JC, Ledoux D (2004) The use of protocols for nutritional support is definitely needed in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 32: 2354–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. (2001) Soins et surveillance des abords digestifs pour ľalimentation entérale chez ľadulte en hospitalisation et à domicile. Nutr Clin Metabol 15: 32–70

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chang WK, McClave SA, Chao YC (2004) Continuous nasogastric tube feeding: monitoring by combined use of refractometry and traditional gastric residual volumes. Clin Nutr 23:105–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Metheny NA, Clouse RE, Chang YH et al. (2006) Tracheo-bronchial aspiration of gastric contents in critically ill tube-fed patients: frequency, outcomes, and risk factors. Crit Care Med 34: 1007–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McClave SA, DeMeo MT, DeLegge MH et al. (2002) North American Summit on Aspiration in the Critically Ill Patient: consensus statement. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 26: S80–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dive A, Miesse C, Galanti L et al. (1995) Effect of erythromycin on gastric motility in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Crit Care Med 23: 1356–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Metheny NA (2002) Risk factors for aspiration. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 26: S26–31; discussion S2–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Raidoo DM, Rocke DA, Brock-Utne JG et al. (1990) Critical volume for pulmonary acid aspiration: reappraisal in a primate model. Br J Anaesth 65: 248–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Knight PR, Rutter T, Tait AR et al. (1993) Pathogenesis of gastric particulate lung injury: a comparison and interaction with acidic pneumonitis. Anesth Analg 77: 754–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Umuroglu T, Takil A, Irmak P et al. (2006) Effects of multiple pulmonary aspirations of enteral solutions on lung tissue damage. Clin Nutr 25: 45–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hart GK, Dobb GJ (1988) Effect of a fecal bulking agent on diarrhea during enteral feeding in the critically ill. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 12: 465–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ciocon JO, Silverstone FA, Graver M, Foley CJ (1988) Tube feedings in elderly patients: indications, benefits, and complications. Arch Intern Med 148: 429–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Heyland DK, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH (1993) Enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a critical review of the evidence. Intensive Care Med 19: 435–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bliss DZ, Johnson S, Savik K et al. (1998) Acquisition of Clostridium difficile and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in hospitalized patients receiving tube feeding. Ann Intern Med 129: 1012–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gottschlich MM, Warden GD, Michel M et al. (1988) Diarrhea in tube-fed burn patients: incidence, etiology, nutritional impact, and prevention. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 12: 338–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bonten MJ, Bergmans DC, Ambergen AW et al. (1996) Risk factors for pneumonia, and colonization of respiratory tract and stomach in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154: 1339–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Montecalvo MA, Steger KA, Farber HW et al. (1992) Nutritional outcome and pneumonia in critical care patients randomized to gastric versus jejunal tube feedings. The Critical Care Research Team. Crit Care Med 20:1377–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Neumann DA, DeLegge MH (2002) Gastric versus small-bowel tube feeding in the intensive care unit: a prospective comparison of efficacy. Crit Care Med 30: 1436–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW et al. (2003) Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 27: 355–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Esparza J, Boivin MA, Hartshorne MF, Levy H (2001) Equal aspiration rates in gastrically and transpylorically fed critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 27: 660–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Montejo JC, Grau T, Acosta J et al. (2002) Multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind study comparing the efficacy and gastrointestinal complications of early jejunal feeding with early gastric feeding in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 30: 796–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. McClave SA, Lukan JK, Stefater JA et al. (2005) Poor validity of residual volumes as a marker for risk of aspiration in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 33: 324–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Drakulovic MB, Torres A, Bauer TT et al. (1999) Supine body position as a risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients: a randomised trial. Lancet 354: 1851–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. van Nieuwenhoven CA, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C, van Tiel FH et al. (2006) Feasibility and effects of the semirecumbent position to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia: a randomized study. Crit Care Med 34: 396–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ibanez J, Penafiel A, Raurich JM et al. (1992) Gastroesophageal reflux in intubated patients receiving enteral nutrition: effect of supine and semirecumbent positions. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 16: 419–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Locke GR, 3rd, Talley NJ, Fett SL et al. (1999) Risk factors associated with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Med 106: 642–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ferrer M, Bauer TT, Torres A et al. (1999) Effect of nasogastric tube size on gastroesophageal reflux and microaspiration in intubated patients. Ann Intern Med 130: 991–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mentec H, Dupont H, Bocchetti M et al. (2001) Upper digestive intolerance during enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: frequency, risk factors, and complications. Crit Care Med 29: 1955–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Petros S, Engelmann L (2006) Enteral nutrition delivery and energy expenditure in medical intensive care patients. Clin Nutr 25: 51–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mentec H, Plantefève G, Boulet E et al. (2005) Early introduction of prokinetics during enteral nutrition in ICU patients. Intensive Care Med 31 (Suppl 1): S81

    Google Scholar 

  40. Berger MM, Bollmann MD, Revelly JP et al. (2002) Progression rate of self-propelled feeding tubes in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 28: 1768–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ray WA, Murray KT, Meredith S et al. (2004) Oral erythromycin and the risk of sudden death from cardiac causes. N Engl J Med 351: 1089–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Dall’antonia M, Wilks M, Coen PG et al. (2005) Erythromycin for prokinesis: imprudent prescribing? Crit Care 10: 112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. MacLaren R, Kuhl DA, Gervasio JM et al. (2000) Sequential single doses of cisapride, erythromycin, and metoclopramide in critically ill patients intolerant to enteral nutrition: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Crit Care Med 28: 438–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Yavagal DR, Karnad DR, Oak JL (2000) Metoclopramide for preventing pneumonia in critically ill patients receiving enteral tube feeding: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 28: 1408–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Bleichner G, Blehaut H, Mentec H, Moyse D (1997) Saccharomyces boulardii prevents diarrhea in critically ill tubefed patients. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 23: 517–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. de Luis DA, Aller R, Izaola O et al. (2006) Experience of 6 years with home enteral nutrition in an area of Spain. Eur J Clin Nutr 60: 553–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Homann HH, Kemen M, Fuessenich C et al. (1994) Reduction in diarrhea incidence by soluble fiber in patients receiving total or supplemental enteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 18: 486–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kelly TW, Patrick MR, Hillman KM (1983) Study of diarrhea in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 11:7–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Heyland D, Bradley C, Mandell LA (1992) Effect of acidified enteral feedings on gastric colonization in the critically ill patient. Crit Care Med 20: 1388–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Brown RO, Carlson SD, Cowan GS Jr. et al. (1987) Enteral nutritional support management in a university teaching hospital: team vs nonteam. JPEN Parenter Enter 11: 52–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Newton M, Burnham WR, Kamm MA (2000) Morbidity, mortality, and risk factors for esophagitis in hospital inpatients. J Clin Gastroenterol 30: 264–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Hwang TL, Lue MC, Nee YJ et al. (1994) The incidence of diarrhea in patients with hypoalbuminemia due to acute or chronic malnutrition during enteral feeding. Am J Gastroenterol 89: 376–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Schneider SM, Le Gall P, Girard-Pipau F et al. (2000) Total artificial nutrition is associated with major changes in the fecal flora. Eur J Nutr 39: 248–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Keohane PP, Attrill H, Love M et al. (1984) Relation between osmolality of diet and gastrointestinal side effects in enteral nutrition. Br Med J 288: 678–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. McFarland LV, Surawicz CM, Greenberg RN et al. (1994) A randomized placebo-controlled trial of Saccharomyces boulardii in combination with standard antibiotics for Clostridium difficile disease. JAMA 271: 1913–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Tempé JD, Steidel AL, Bléhaut H et al. (1983) Prévention par Saccharomyces boulardii des diarrhées de ľalimentation entérale à débit continu. Sem Hop Paris 59: 1409–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Schlotterer M, Bernasconi P, Lebreton F, Wassermann D (1987) Interêr de Saccharomyces boulardii dans la tolérance digestive de la nutrition entérale ê débit continu chez le brûle. Nutr Clin Metabol 1: 31–4

    Google Scholar 

  58. Perrotin D, Lebret P, Kerouredan Y, Giniès G (1988) Diarrhées acquises en réanimation: facteurs favorisants et pronostiques. Rean Soins Intens Med Urg 4: 393

    Google Scholar 

  59. Guédon C (2000) Les sondes ďalimentation entérale. Nutr Clin Metabol 14: 112–5

    Google Scholar 

  60. Heyland D, Cook DJ, Winder B et al. (1995) Enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a prospective survey. Crit Care Med 23: 1055–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. DeMeo M, Kolli S, Keshavarzian A et al. (1998) Beneficial effect of a bile acid resin binder on enteral feeding induced diarrhea. Am J Gastroenterol 93: 967–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Kohn CL (1991) The relationship between enteral formula contamination and length of enteral delivery set usage. JPEN J parenter Enteral Nutr 15: 567–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Löser C, Aschl G, Hébuterne X et al. (2005) ESPEN guidelines on artificial enteral nutrition — percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Clin Nutr 24: 848–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Jacobs S, Chang RW, Lee B, Bartlett FW (1990) Continuous enteral feeding: a major cause of pneumonia among ventilated intensive care unit patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 14: 353–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Taguchi A, Sharma N, Saleem RM et al. (2001) Selective postoperative inhibition of gastrointestinal opioid receptors. N Engl J Med 345: 935–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. van der Spoel JI, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Stoutenbeek CP et al. (2001) Neostigmine resolves critical illness-related colonic ileus in intensive care patients with multiple organ failure-a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 27: 822–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Plantefève, G., Mentec, H., Bleichner, G. (2007). Nutrition entérale: surveillance et complications. In: Traité de nutrition artificielle de l’adulte. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-33475-7_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-33475-7_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-33474-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-33475-7

Publish with us

Policies and ethics