Abstract
Copy number variations (CNVs) in the genomes have been suggested to play important roles in human evolution, genetic diversity, and disease susceptibility. A number of assays have been developed for the detection of CNVs, including fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), PCR-based assays, and next-generation sequencing (NGS). In this chapter, we describe a microarray method that has been used for the detection of genome-wide CNVs, loss of heterozygosity (LOH), and uniparental disomy (UPD) associated with constitutional and neoplastic disorders.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2012) An integrated map of genetic variation from 1092 human genomes. Nature 491:56–65
1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2015) A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 256:68–74
Sudmant PH, Rausch T, Gardner EJ et al (2015) An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes. Nature 526:75–81
Iafrate AJ, Feuk L, Rivera MN et al (2004) Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nat Genet 36:949–951
Sebat J, Lakshmi B, Troge J et al (2004) Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome. Science 305:525–528
Freeman JL, Perry GH, Feuk L et al (2006) Copy number variation: new insights in genome diversity. Genome Res 16:949–961
Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR et al (2006) Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 444:444–454
McCarroll SA, Kuruvilla FG, Korn JM et al (2008) Integrated detection and population-genetic analysis of SNPs and copy number variation. Nat Genet 40:1166–1174
Korn JM, Kuruvilla FG, McCarroll SA et al (2008) Integrated genotype calling and association analysis of SNPs, common copy number polymorphisms and rare CNVs. Nat Genet 40:1253–1260
Conrad DF, Pinto D, Redon R et al (2010) Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome. Nature 464:704–712
McCarroll SA (2010) Copy number variation and human genome maps. Nat Genet 42:365–366
Park H, Kim JI, Ju YS et al (2010) Discovery of common Asian copy number variants using integrated high-resolution array CGH and massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nat Genet 42:400–405
Gersen SL, Keagle MB (2013) The principle of clinical cytogenetics, 3rd edn. Springer Science + Business Media, New York
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144:646–674
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2011) Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 474:609–615
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2012) Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490:61–70
Yang L, Luquette LJ, Gehlenborg N et al (2013) Diverse mechanisms of somatic structural variations in human cancer genomes. Cell 153:919–929
Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D et al (1992) Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 258:818–821
Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D et al (1998) High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet 20:207–211
Roylance R (2001) Comparative genomic hybridization. Methods Mol Med 57:223–240
Cai WW, Mao JH, Chow CW et al (2002) Genome-wide detection of chromosomal imbalances in tumors using BAC microarrays. Nat Biotechnol 20:393–396
Cowell JK, Matsui S, Wang YD et al (2004) Application of bacterial artificial chromosome array-based comparative genomic hybridization and spectral karyotyping to the analysis of glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 151:36–51
Shaffer LG, Bejjani BA (2004) A cytogeneticist’s perspective on genomic microarrays. Hum Reprod Update 10:221–226
Tchinda J, Lee C (2006) Detecting copy number variation in the human genome using comparative genomic hybridization. BioTechniques 41:385–392
Carter NP (2007) Methods and strategies for analyzing copy number variation using DNA microarrays. Nat Genet 39:S16–S2
Hester SD, Reid L, Nowak N et al (2009) Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization technologies across microarray platforms. J Biomol Tech 20:135–151
Holcomb IN, Trask BJ (2011) Comparative genomic hybridization to detect variation in the copy number of large DNA segments. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2011:1323–1333
Pinto D, Darvishi K, Shi X et al (2011) Comprehensive assessment of array-based platforms and calling algorithms for detection of copy number variants. Nat Biotechnol 29:512–520
UserGuide: Cytoscan® Assay [PDF] (2011–2012) Santa Clara CA: Affymetrix Inc
Shaw-Smith C, Redon R, Rickman L et al (2004) Microarray based comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH) detects submicroscopic chromosomal deletions and duplications in patients with learning disability/mental retardation and dysmorphic features. J Med Genet 41:241–248
Rickman L, Fiegler H, Shaw-Smith C et al (2005) Prenatal detection of unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements by array CGH. J Med Genet 43:353–361
Pfeifer D, Pantic M, Skatulla I et al (2006) Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy number changes and LOH in CLL using high-density SNP arrays. Blood 109:1202–1210
Jacobs S, Thompson ER, Nannya Y et al (2007) Genome-wide, high-resolution detection of copy number, loss of heterozygosity, and genotypes from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue using microarrays. Cancer Res 67:2544–2551
Bowden W, Skorupski J, Kovanci E et al (2009) Detection of novel copy number variants in uterine leiomyomas using high-resolution SNP arrays. Mol Hum Reprod 15:563–568
Scott SA, Cohen N, Brandt T et al (2009) Detection of low-level mosaicism and placental mosaicism by oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization. Genet Med 12:85–92
Heim S, Mitelman F (eds) (2015) Cancer cytogenetics: chromosomal and molecular genetic abberations of tumor cells. Wiley-Blackwell, New York
Heim S, Mitelman F (2009) Cancer cytogenetics. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ
Beroukhim R, Mermel CH, Porter D et al (2010) The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature 463:899–905
Conlin LK, Thiel BD, Bonnemann CG et al (2010) Mechanisms of mosaicism, chimerism and uniparental disomy identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis. Hum Mol Genet 19:1263–1275
Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S et al (2010) Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 86:749–764
FDA News Release (2014) FDA allows marketing for first of-its-kind post-natal test to help diagnose developmental delays and intellectual disabilities in children. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm382179.htm
Affymetrix UserGuide (2015) UserGuide: OncoScan® CNV FFPE Assay Kit [PDF]. Affymetrix Inc, Santa Clara, CA
Foster JM, Oumie A, Togneri FS et al (2015) Cross-laboratory validation of the OncoScan® FFPE Assay, a multiplex tool for whole genome tumour profiling. BMC Med Genomics 8:5
Acknowledgment
We would like to thank Dr. Charles Lee and other colleagues for their kind help and support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Zhang, C., Cerveira, E., Romanovitch, M., Zhu, Q. (2017). Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH). In: Wan, T. (eds) Cancer Cytogenetics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1541. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6703-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6703-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6701-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6703-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols