Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter discussed tools for checking and improving the structure of Bayesian networks. We are interested in fit indices that highlight particular kinds of model misfit that we know can appear in assessment data and distort our uses of the model. The initial sections introduce some fit indices and looks at the technique of posterior predictive model checking (PPMC). Subsequent sections address graphical methods for assessing model fit, differential task functioning, and model comparison. Key ideas from the model selection literature and the pitfalls in attempting to learn "causality" from data are reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Yes, this is frequentist reasoning in a book about Bayesian inference. Rubin (1984) explains that this is appropriate logic for Bayesians who want to compare features of an observed data set against the corresponding features in a sample of data sets generated from a posited model.

  2. 2.

    In IRT, the most popular method for detecting DIF is the nonparametric Mantel– Haenszel test (Holland and Thayer 1988), which conditions on observed score. See Exercise 10.9 and Sect. 13.2.2.

  3. 3.

    The term “faithful” has a precise technical definition in the literature of causal discovery: Roughly, the d-separation relationships in the digraph correspond completely to the conditional independencies in the probability distribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell G. Almond .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Almond, R., Mislevy, R., Steinberg, L., Yan, D., Williamson, D. (2015). Critiquing and Learning Model Structure. In: Bayesian Networks in Educational Assessment. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2125-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics