Skip to main content

Abstract

The systematic assessment of aphasic disability is as old as aphasiology itself. Broca (1861) described a rather detailed testing procedure that must have been routinely employed by clinicians at that time in examining aphasics. In fact, much of the interview with Lalonde, his second patient, is similar to what some clinicians do even today. He began by asking his patient conversational questions, commented on the patient’s speech output and comprehension, and went on to describe his gestures, tested his tongue movements, his writing, and arithmetic. Hughlings Jackson added sign making, writing, comprehension, repetition, reading, and tongue movements, as well as a description of spontaneous speech, as regular features of the aphasia examination. Pierre Marie (1906) emphasized the importance of deficits in comprehension. Moutier (1908), Pierre Marie’s pupil, described a rather complete set of systematic tests for aphasics in his large monograph entitled “L’aphasie de Broca.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Appell, J., Kertesz, A.,& Fisman, M. (1982). A study of language functioning in Alzheimer patients. Brain and Language, 17, 73–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. L. (1983, November). A critique of the WAB. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Speech and Hearing Association, Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, D. F. (1967). Fluency in aphasia: Correlation with radioactive scan localization. Cortex, 3, 373–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, A. L. (1967). Problems of test construction in the field of aphasia. Cortex, 3, 32–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, A. L., & Hamsher, K. (1976). Multilingual aphasia examination. Iowa City: Department of Neurology, University Hospitals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, S. E., Baker, E., & Goodglass, H. (1977). Phonological factors in auditory comprehension in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 15, 19–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boiler, F., & Dennis, M. (Eds.). (1979). Auditory comprehension: Clinical and experimental studies with the Token Test. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boiler, F., & Green, E. (1972). Comprehension in severe aphasia. Cortex, 8, 382–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, D. R. (1972). Porch index of communicative ability. In O. K. Büros (Ed.), Seventh mental measurements yearbook: Vol. II. Highland Park, NY: Gryphon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borod, S. C., Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1980). Normative data on the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, Parietal Lobe Battery and the Boston Naming Test. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2, 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broca, P. (1861). Remarques sur le siège de la faculté du langage articulé, suivies d’une observation d’aphémie (perte de la parole). Bulletin de la Société de l’Anatomie, 36, 330–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire, R. H. (1979). The Language Modalities Test for aphasia. In F. L. Darley (Ed.), Evaluation of appraisal techniques in speech and language pathology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bub, D., & Kertesz, A. (1982). Deep agraphia. Brain and Language, 17, 146–165.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., Engel, D., Kelter, S., List, G., Strohner, H. (1977). Validity of the Sklar Aphasia Scale. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 146–154.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, D. J. (1977). A comparison of empirically derived groups of aphasie patients on the N.C.C.E.A. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 194–198.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, M. (1976). Dissociated naming and locating of body parts after left anterior temporal lobe resection: An experimental case study. Brain and Language, 3, 147–163.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeRenzi, E. (1979). A shortened version of the Token Test. In F. Boiler M. & Dennis (Eds.), Auditory comprehension: Clinical and experimental studies with the Token Test. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRenzi, E., & Faglioni, P. (1978). Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the Token Test. Cortex, 14, 41–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeRenzi, E., & Vignolo, L. (1962). The Token Test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasies. Brain, 85, 665–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenson, J. (1954). Examining for aphasia: A manual for the examination of aphasia and related disturbances. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenson, J. (1972). Aphasia in children. New York: Harper Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerick, L. L. (1971). The appraisal of language disturbance. Manual. Marquette: Northern Michigan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., Albert, M. L. & Weintraub, S. (1975). Comprehending a word: The influence of speed and redundancy on auditory comprehension in aphasia. Cortex, 11, 115–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geschwind, N., & Fusillo, M. (1966). Color naming defects in association with alexia. Archives of Neurology, 15, 137–146.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E. (1972). Assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia: Lea Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). Assessment of aphasia and related disorders (rev. ed.). Philadelphia: Lea Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H., Klein, B., Carey, P. & Jones, K. (1966). Specific semantic word categories in aphasia. Cortex, 2, 74–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H., Quadfasel, F. A., & Timberlake, W. H. (1964). Phrase length and the type of severity of aphasia. Cortex, 1, 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H., Gleason, J., & Hyde, M. (1970). Some dimensions of auditory language comprehension in aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13, 595–606.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Head, H. (1926). Aphasia and kindred disorders of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hier, D. B., & Mohr, J. (1977). Incongruous oral and written naming. Brain and Language, 4, 115–126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. L. (1977). Communicative abilities in daily living: Its measurement and observation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Aphasia, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. L. (1980). Communicative abilities in daily living. Manual. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, D., & Geschwind, N. (1964). Quantitative studies of aphasie language. Association for Research in Neurology and Mental Disease, 42, 229–244.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K. (1983). Aachener-Aphasie Test. Toronto: Verlag für Psychologie Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). The Boston Naming Test Philadelphia: Lea Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, S. S., Brassel, E. G. (1975). Aphasia Language Performance Scales (ALPS). Murfreesboro, TN: Pinnacle Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenin, M., & Swisher, L. P. (1972). A study of patterns of recovery in aphasia. Cortex, 8, 56–68.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerschensteiner, M., Poeck, K., Brunner, E. (1972). The fluency-nonfluency dimension in the classification of aphasie speech. Cortex, 8, 233–247.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kertesz, A. (1979). Aphasia and associated disorders: Taxonomy, localization, and recovery. New York: Grune Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertesz, A. (1982). The Western Aphasia Battery. New York: Grune Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertesz, A., & Phipps, J. (1977). Numerical taxonomy of aphasia. Brain and Language, 4, 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kertesz, A., & Poole, E. (1974). The aphasia quotient: The taxonomic approach to measurement of aphasie disability. Canadian Journal of Neurology, 1, 7–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liepmann, H. (1905). Uber Störungen des Handelns bei Gehirnkranken. Berlin: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, J. L., & Boiler, F. (1979). Components of auditory comprehension: Analysis of errors in a revised Token Test. In F. Boiler & M. Dennis (Eds.), Auditory comprehension: Clinical and experimental studies with the Token Test. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marie, P. (1906). Revision de la question de l’aphasie: La troisième circonvolution frontale gauche ne joue aucun role special dans la fonction du langage. Séminaires de Médecin, 21, 241–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. D. (1977). Aphasia testing: A second look at the Porch Index of Communicative Ability. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 42, 547–561.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, M. R., Prescott T. E., & Chang, E. C. (1975). A measure of the PICA ordinality. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moutier, F. (1908). L’aphasie de Broca. Paris: Steinheil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ombredane, A. (1951). L’Aphasie et élaboration de la pensée explicite. Paris: Presses Universitaire de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradis, M. (1983, November). A Report on the Polyglot Aphasia Test. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Speech and Hearing Association, Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poeck, K., Kerschensteiner, M., & Hartje, W. (1972). A quantitative study on language understanding in fluent and nonfluent aphasia. Cortex, 8, 299–302.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poeck, K., Hartje, W., Kerschensteiner, M., & Orgass, B. (1973). Sprachverstandisstörungen bei aphasischen und nichtaphasischen Hirnkranken. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 98, 139–147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poeck, K., Orgass, B., Kerschensteiner, M., & Hartje, W. (1974). A qualitative study on Token Test performance in aphasic and nonaphasic brain damaged patients. Neuropsychologics 12, 49–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porch, B. E. (1967). Porch Index of Communicative Ability: Theory and development. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porch, B. E. (1971). Porch Index of Communicative Ability: Administration, scoring and interpretation (rev. ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porch, B. E., Collins, M., Wertz, R. T., & Friden, T. P. (1980). Statistical prediction of change in aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 312–321.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sands, E., Samo, M. T., Shankweiler, D. (1969). Long-term assessment of language function in aphasia due to stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 50, 202–207.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarno, M. T. (1969). The Functional Communication Profile. Manual (Rehabilitation Monographs No. 42 ). New York: New York University Medical Center, Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarno, M. T., & Levita, E. (1971). Natural course of recovery in severe aphasia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 52, 175–179.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuell, H. (1957). A short examination for aphasia. Neurology, 7, 625–634.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuell, H. (1965). The Minnesota test for differential diagnosis of aphasia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuell, H. (1974). Diagnosis and prognosis in aphasia. In L. F. Sies (Ed.), Aphasia, theory and therapy. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuell, H., Jenkins, J. J. (1961). Reduction of vocabulary in aphasia. Brain, 84, 243–261.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shewan, C. M., & Kertesz, A. (1980). Reliability and validity characteristics of the Western Aphasia Battery ( WAB ). Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 308–324.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shewan, C. M., & Kertesz, A. (1984). Effects of speech and language treatment on recovery from aphasia. Brain and Language, 23, 2: 272–299.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, M. (1973). Sklar Aphasia Scale: Protocol booklet. Beverly Hills, CA: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellacy, F. J., & Spreen, O. (1969). A short form of the Token Test. Cortex, 5, 390–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreen, O., Benton, A. L. (1968). Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreen, O., & Benton, A. L. (1977). Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia (rev. ed.). Victoria, BC: Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. L. (1965). A measurement of functional communication in aphasia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 46, 101–107.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J., & Enderby, P. (1979). Is all your Schuell really necessary? British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 14, 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, E., Snow, C., & Prins, R. (1975). Spontaneous speech of aphasia patients: A psycholinguistic analysis. Brain and Language, 2, 281–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weisenburg, T. H., McBride, K. E. (1935). Aphasia. New York: Commonwealth Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wepman, J. M., Jones, L. V. (1961). Studies in aphasia: An approach to testing. Chicago: Education-Industry Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, R. T. (1979). Word fluency measure. In F. L. Darley (Ed.), Evaluation of appraisal techniques in speech and language pathology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, R. T. (1983, November). A Comparison of the BDAE, PICA and the WAB. Paper presented at a meeting of the American Speech and Hearing Association, Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whurr, R. (1974). Aphasia screening test. Unpublished manuscript, National Hospital, Queen’s Square, Department of Speech Therapy, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmes, K. (1981). A new look at the Token Test using probabilistic test models. Neuropsychologia, 19, 631–645.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kertesz, A. (1986). Assessment of Aphasia. In: Incagnoli, T., Goldstein, G., Golden, C.J. (eds) Clinical Application of Neuropsychological Test Batteries. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4991-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4991-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4993-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4991-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics