Skip to main content

Interaction Analysis of a Biology Chat

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Productive Multivocality in the Analysis of Group Interactions

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series ((CULS,volume 15))

Abstract

This is an analysis of data from initial attempts to combine (a) technology from the Virtual Math Teams (VMT) Project, (b) helping agents, (c) collaborative small groups, and (d) accountable-talk prompting in order to scaffold biology student online chats about videotaped results of a biology experiment. Analysis of the response structure of the chat log of a student group reveals characteristics of their interactions in terms of building collaborative knowledge. In particular, the mediation by the VMT technology, helping agents, and accountable-talk training is analyzed to determine their influences in promoting productive learning-oriented interaction. A design-based-research analytic perspective provides suggestions for redesign of the socio-technical approach based on the findings from the interaction analysis. Redesign in response to the analysis results in clear improvement, as seen in analysis of the response structure of a chat log from a second test cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Çakır, M. P., Zemel, A., & Stahl, G. (2009). The joint organization of interaction within a multimodal CSCL medium. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 4(2), 115–149. Retrieved from http://GerryStahl.net/pub/ijCSCL_4_2_1.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, E. S., & Shumar, W. (2009). Student and team agency in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 207–224). New York, NY: Springer. Chapter 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open University of the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2006). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake, & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 275–301). Dodrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer–Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 4(1), 39–103. Retrieved from http://lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/students/c-merkel/document4.HTM

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1962/1995). Lectures on conversation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2006a). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2006b). Scripting group cognition: The problem of guiding situated collaboration. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives. (pp. 327–335). Dodrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer–Springer. Retrieved from http://GerryStahl.net/pub/scripting.pdf

  • Stahl, G. (2006c). Sustaining group cognition in a math chat environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning (RPTEL). 1(2), 85–113. Retrieved from http://GerryStahl.net/pub/rptel.pdf

  • Stahl, G. (2009). Studying virtual math teams. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2011). The structure of collaborative problem solving in a virtual math team. Paper presented at the Conference 2011. Seattle, WA. Retrieved from http://GerryStahl.net/pub/iconf2011.pdf

  • Stahl, G. (2012). Theories of cognition in collaborative learning. In C. Hmelo-Silver, A. O’Donnell, C. Chan & C. Chinn (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from http://GerryStahl.net/pub/clhandbook.pdf

  • Stahl, G., Rosé, C. P., O’Hara, K., & Powell, A. B. (2010). Supporting group math cognition in virtual math teams with software conversational agents. Paper presented at the First North American GeoGebra Conference. Ithaca, NY. Retrieved from http://GerryStahl.net/pub/geogebrana 2010a.pdf

  • Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerry Stahl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A: Chat Log of Group C01 from Cycle One

Appendix B: Chat Log of Group F01 from Cycle Two

No.

Time

Tutor

539CN5

504CN1

550CN5

1

13.57

Hi, my name is Sage. I’ll be working with you in this activity. Take a minute to introduce yourselves

   

2

14.42

I won’t tell you if you’re right or wrong, but I’ll give feedback as you discuss things as a team

   

3

14.49

  

Hi dajha!

 

4

14.58

Let’s look at a setup which is the opposite of the one we saw earlier—the iodine is now inside and the starch is outside

   

5

15.24

On the whiteboard, you can see a picture of this new setup

   

6

15.29

   

Vinny<3

7

15.38

Here’s what happened in this setup over time

   

8

15.59

Notice how the inside and outside environments changed. Why did these changes happen?

   

9

16.26

  

The iodine left the bag

 

10

16.31

Okay, 504CN1—why would how we use indicators be relevant?

   

11

17.39

   

The iodine was never in the bag the iodine went into the bag

12

17.48

    

13

17.51

  

The weight is decreasing and the starch water changed colors

 

14

17.54

Any input from 539CN5?

   

15

18.59

 

If you look at the diagram it shows the big getting liter because the iodine left the bag

  

16

19.21

   

Agreed…

17

19.26

  

Agreed…

 

18

19.32

Okay, team—in a moment we’ll move to another set of experiments

   

19

19.56

For these experiments, we’ll use the same membrane, but with pure water on the outside and a glucose solution on the inside

   

20

20.27

Discuss the differences between glucose and starch molecules

   

21

20.46

   

Glucose molecules weigh less

22

21.19

We’ll use the tube weight as an indicator for water movement

   

23

21.23

We’ll also use glucose test strips to detect glucose in both environments

   

24

21.37

On the whiteboard, you can see what happened in this setup over time

   

25

22.01

The results with glucose are different than what you saw with starch—as a team, discuss and agree upon an explanation for these results

   

26

22.50

  

The weight of the glucose solution increased over the time period

 

27

22.59

 

The water has no sugar in it so the strip will stay yellow. the glucose solution has sugar so the strip will turn green

  

28

23.03

   

I think the glucose molecules left the bag and went into the water in the process of that water molecules entered the bag

29

23.41

  

Once again......agreed with dajha … haha backslash

 

30

24.00

   

Always a smart thing to do

31

24.41

  

But also i agree with vicky too

 

32

24.50

    

33

25.32

 

And over time glucose cane out of the bag and got into the water and that is why after 1 and 24 h the strip that was in the water started to change

  

34

25.38

Okay, everyone—let’s move on to the last experiment

   

35

26.00

In this setup we have glucose solution on the outside, pure water on the inside

   

36

26.23

What changes do you think you’ll see in this condition? Agree on a prediction for what you’ll observe over time, and an explanation that everyone understands

   

37

26.50

 

The water has not sugar so the strip is yellow

  

38

27.36

 

and the glucose has sugar and the strip is green

  

39

27.41

So is 539CN5 saying “a glucose test strip changes color when glucose is there?”

   

40

27.51

 

Yes

  

41

28.06

  

I think the glucose test strip will slowly change to a bright yellow color it is on the weighing scale. also i think the bag of distilled water will weigh more because over time of sitting in the glucose you will get some glucose molecules in the

 

42

28.06

   

I don’t think the sugar molecules will get in side the membrane i think they will be to big i think the water molecules will come out of the membrane and go into a concentrated equal environment

43

28.13

Would another way to say that be “molecules will move to the area of lower concentration if they can?”

   

44

28.38

   

Yes

45

29.41

  

Agreed........with dajha again!

 

46

29.51

 

I agree to

  

47

30.02

Make sure each of you is clear on your team’s prediction and explanation, and write it in your worksheet

   

48

30.09

  

We all agree!

 

49

30.45

All right, we’re wrapping up. Thanks, team!

   

50

30.53

   

Just to restate… the sugar molecules will not go into the membrane the distilled water will come out and the test strip will turn yellow

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stahl, G. (2013). Interaction Analysis of a Biology Chat. In: Suthers, D., Lund, K., Rosé, C., Teplovs, C., Law, N. (eds) Productive Multivocality in the Analysis of Group Interactions. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8960-3_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics