Abstract
In the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, the word paradigm is defined in the following way: “a philosophical and theoretical framework of a scientific school or discipline within which theories, laws, and generalizations and experiments performed in support of them are formulated; broadly: a philosophical or theoretical framework of any kind.” This definition reflects the contemporary meaning of the term coined by Kuhn (1962), who spoke of two characteristics of a “paradigm”: A theory powerful enough to “attract an enduring group of researchers” (p. 10) and to provide enough open ends to sustain the researchers with topics requiring further study. In light of these considerations, the overarching research stance linked to APOS Theory is referred to as a paradigm, since (1) it differs from most mathematics education research in its theoretical approach, methodology, and types of results offered; (2) it contains theoretical, methodological, and pedagogical components that are closely linked together; (3) it continues to attract researchers who find it useful to answer questions related to the learning of numerous mathematical concepts, and (4) it continues to supply open-ended questions to be resolved by the research community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas, K. (1996). A framework for research and curriculum development in undergraduate mathematics education. In Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education II. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education (Vol. 6, pp. 1–32). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Asiala, M., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., Morics, S., & Oktaç, A. (1997). Development of students’ understanding of cosets, normality and quotient groups. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16, 241–309.
Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K., & Vidaković, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process schema. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 167–192.
Dubinsky, E., Dautermann, J., Leron, U., & Zazkis, R. (1994). On learning fundamental concepts of group theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 267–305.
Dubinsky, E., Weller, K., McDonald, M. A., & Brown, A. (2005a). Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: An APOS analysis: Part 1. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 335–359.
Dubinsky, E., Weller, K., McDonald, M. A., & Brown, A. (2005b). Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: An APOS analysis: Part 2. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 253–266.
Kú, D., Trigueros, M., & Oktaç, A. (2008). Comprensión del concepto de base de un espacio vectorial desde el punto de vista de la teoría APOE. Educación Matemática, 20(2), 65–89.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Martínez-Planell, R., & Trigueros, M. (2012). Students’ understanding of the general notion of a function of two variables. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81, 365–384.
Roa-Fuentes, S., & Oktaç, A. (2010). Construcción de una descomposición genética: Análisis teórico del concepto transformación lineal. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 13(1), 89–112.
Roa-Fuentes, S., & Oktaç, A. (2012). Validación de una descomposición genética de transformación lineal: Un análisis refinado por la aplicación del ciclo de investigación de APOE. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 15(2), 199–232.
Stenger, C., Weller, K., Arnon, I., Dubinsky, E., & Vidaković, D. (2008). A search for a constructivist approach for understanding the uncountable set P(N). Revisto Latinoamericano de Investigacion en Matematicas Educativas, 11(1), 93–126.
Trigueros, M., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2010). Geometrical representations in the learning of two-variable functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73, 3–19.
Vidaković, D. (1993). Cooperative learning: Differences between group and individual processes of construction of the concept of inverse function. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weller, K., Arnon, I., & Dubinsky, E. (2009). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the relation between a fraction or integer and its decimal expansion. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 9, 5–28.
Weller, K., Arnon, I., & Dubinsky, E. (2011). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the relation between a fraction or integer and its decimal expansion: Strength and stability of belief. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 11, 129–159.
Weller, K., Brown, A., Dubinsky, E., McDonald, M., & Stenger, C. (2004). Intimations of infinity. Notices of the AMS, 51, 741–750.
Weller, K., Clark, J. M., Dubinsky, E., Loch, S., McDonald, M. A., & Merkovsky, R. (2003). Student performance and attitudes in courses based on APOS theory and the ACE teaching cycle. In Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education V. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education (Vol. 12, pp. 97–131). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arnon, I. et al. (2014). The APOS Paradigm for Research and Curriculum Development. In: APOS Theory. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7966-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7966-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7965-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7966-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)