Abstract
“In the rich literature on the city we look in vain for a theory of urbanism presenting in a systematic fashion the available knowledge concerning the city as a social entity.” (31, p. 8), For three very different reasons this statement of Louis Wirth may be as true today as it was when he wrote it in 1938. One likely reason why this is the case reflects the highly political nature of urban studies, on which Robert Merton remarked in 1948 (22, p. 164):
Yet so deep has been the concern of social movements for housing reform that they have sought to establish a ‘case’ for adequate housing by citing often defective actuarial inquiries…, rather than by directly affirming an institutional right to decent housing in precisely the same sense that education was defined as such a right with the emergence of public education.2
Research funded in part by the National Science Foundation.
Elsewhere in this essay Merton notes that “housing involves the economic interests and social sentiments of important skill-groups and power-groups in American society.” The urban researcher encounters hazards from research, institutional cross-fire, urgency and uncritical empiricism (22, pp. 164–177, passim).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alderson, S. Britain in the Sixties: Housing. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1962.
Baldassare, M. The effects of density on social behavior and attitudes. American Behavioral Scientist, 1975, 18: 815–825.
Booth, A. Urban Crowding Project: Final Report. Ottawa: Ministry of State for Urban Affairs, Canada, 1975.
Booth, A. The Effect of Crowding on Urban Families. This volume.
Bruner, J. and Postman, L. An approach to social perception. In Current Trends in Social Psychology. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1948.
Carey, W. Density, crowding, stress in the ghetto. American Behavioral Scientist, 1972, 75: 495–508.
Davis, D. L., Bergin, K. J. and Mazin, G. When the Neighbors Get Noisy We Bang on the Walls: A Critique of Density and Crowding. Paper presented to the American Sociological Association meetings, 1974, expanded version in Man-Environment Systems (forthcoming).
Davis, D. L. The shadow scale: An unobtrusive measure of door-to-door interviewing. Sociological Review, 1975, 23: 143–150.
Davis, D. L. Density, crowding and stress: A theoretical model and an unobtrusive measure. In Systems Thinking and the Quality of Life. Compiled by Karl C. Blong, Washington, D. C.: Society for General Systems Research, 1975.
Draper, P. Crowding among hunter-gatherers: the !Kung Bushmen. Science, 1973, 155: 301–303.
Durkheim, E. Division of Labor in Society. George Simpson (trans.) Glencoe: Free Press, 1947.
Epstein Y., Karlin, R. and Aiello, J. Strategies for the Investigation of Crowding. This volume.
Esser, A. H. (ed.) Behavior and Environment: The Use of Space by Animals and Man. New York: Plenum Press, 1971.
Esser, A. H. A biosocial perspective on crowding. In J. Wohlwill and D. Carson (eds.) Environment and the Social Sciences: Perspectives and Applications. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association, 1972.
Esser, A. H. Toward a definition of crowding. Guest Editorial in The Sciences, October, 1971.
Freedman, J. Crowding and Behavior. New York: Viking Press, 1975.
Goffman, E. Behavior in Public Places. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1963.
Goffman, E. Relations in Public, Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books, 1971.
Hall, E. T. The Handbook of Proxemic Research. Washington, D. C.: Society for the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 1974.
Jones, E. Towns and Cities. London: Oxford University Press, 1966.
Keller, S. The Urban Neighborhood. New York: Random House, 1968.
Merton, R. Social psychology of housing. In Dennis Wayne (ed.) Current Trends in Social Psychology. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1948.
Merton, R. On Theoretical Sociology. New York: The Free Press, 1972.
Schmitt, R. C. Implications of density in Hong Kong. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1963, 29: 210–217.
Schmitt, R. C. Density, health and social disorganization. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1966. 35: 38–40.
Stokols, D. On the distinction between density and crowding: Some implications for future research. Psychological Review, 1974, 79: 115–111.
Stokols, D. The experience of crowding in primary and secondary environments. Environment and Behavior, 1976, 5: 49–86.
Stokols, D. Ohlig, W., Resnick, S. M. Perception of residential crowding, classroom experiences, and student health. This volume.
Strong, J. Our Country: Its Possible Future and Its Present Crisis. New York: Baker & Taylor, 1885.
Weber, M. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. 4th ed., Winckelmann (ed.). Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1956.
Wirth, L. Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 1938, 44: 1–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davis, D.L. (1978). The Social Experiences of Neighborhood Density and Apartment Density (or Crowding) in Queens, New York City. In: Esser, A.H., Greenbie, B.B. (eds) Design for Communality and Privacy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2853-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2853-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-2855-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2853-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive