Skip to main content

Vertebrate Taphonomy in Archaeological Research

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

Introduction

Broadly applied, taphonomy is the study of what happens to objects after they leave the biosphere (living contexts), enter the lithosphere (buried contexts), and are subsequently recovered and studied. Taphonomy is of interest to any scientific discipline that investigates the buried record, including archaeology, paleobiology, paleontology, and soil sciences. Although the methodological framework of taphonomy can be applied to the study of practically any kind of material that was once buried, including ceramics and lithics, its archaeological application usually involves the study of preserved organic residues. Vertebrate taphonomy is further restricted to the study of preserved skeletal specimens that originate from a subphylum of animals who share a number of characteristics but importantly possess a living endoskeleton of cartilage and bone. These consist of specimens from zoological classes of living jawed vertebrates that are often recovered through archaeological...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 5,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews, P. 1990. Owls, caves and fossils. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrensmeyer, A.K. 1975. The taphonomy and paleoecology of Plio-pleistocene vertebrate assemblages east of Lake Rudolf, Kenya. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 146: 473-578.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1984. Taphonomy and the fossil record. American Scientist 72: 558-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L.R. 1981. Bones: ancient men and modern myths. Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brain, C.K. 1981. The hunters or the hunted? An introduction to African cave taphonomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. & K.K. Kietzke. 1967. Paleoecology of the lower nodule zone, Brule formation in the big badlands of South Dakota. Fieldiana: Geology Memoirs 5: 111-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efremov, I.A. 1940. Taphonomy: a new branch of paleontology. Pan-American Geology 74: 81-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findley, J.S. 1964. Paleoecological reconstructions: vertebrate limitations, in J.J. Hester & J. Schoenwetter (ed.) Proceedings of the Fort Burgwin conference on paleoecology: 1962 (Number 3): 23-5. Fort Burgwin (NM): Fort Burgwin Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D.K. 1981. A critical view of the use of vertebrates in paleoenvironmental reconstruction. Journal of Ethnobiology 1: 28-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1986. Eoliths, archaeological ambiguity, and the generation of “middle-range” research, in D.J. Meltzer, D.D. Fowler & J.A. Sabloff (ed.) American archaeology past and future: 77-133. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, R.E.M. 2002. Bone diagenesis: an overview of processes. Archaeometry 44: 319-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A.P. 1979. Butchery and natural disarticulation: an investigatory technique. American Antiquity 44: 739-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R.L.1987a. Zooarchaeology and taphonomy: a general consideration. Journal of Ethnobiology 7: 93-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1987b. Archaeofaunas and butchery studies: a taphonomic perspective, in M.B. Schiffer (ed.) Advances in archaeological method and theory, Volume 10: 249-337. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1994. Vertebrate taphonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, B.S. & J.L.J. Sanchez. 1994. Comparison of 1/8” and ¼”-mesh recovery of controlled samples of small-to-medium-sized mammals. American Antiquity 59: 525-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, P., G. Foster & M. Schoeninger. 1984. Burnt bones and teeth: an experimental study of color, morphology, crystal structure and shrinkage. Journal of Archaeological Science 11: 307-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, P.W. 1996. The recovery and interpretation of microvertebrate bone assemblages from archaeological contexts. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 3: 31-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorhies, M. 1969. Taphonomy and population dynamics of an early Pliocene vertebrate fauna, Knox County, Nebraska (Contributions to Geology Special Paper 1). Laramie: University of Wyoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.P.N. 1979. The estimation of the relative frequencies of mammalian species: Khirokitia, 1972. Journal of Archaeological Science 6: 127-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M.V.H. 1988. Taphonomic processes: information loss and information gain. Geoscience Canada 15: 131-48.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Behrensmeyer, A.K. & A.P. Hill. (ed.) 1980. Fossils in the making: vertebrate taphonomy and paleoecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, P. 1981. Life history of a fossil. An introduction to taphonomy and paleoecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter W. Stahl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Stahl, P.W. (2014). Vertebrate Taphonomy in Archaeological Research. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_2134

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_2134

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics