Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Appelbaum, P.S., Roth L.H. and Lidz C.W. 1982. The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 5(3–4): 319–329.
Ashcroft, R. 1999. Equipoise, knowledge and ethics in clinical research and practice, Bioethics 13(3–4): 314–326.
Beauchamp, T.L. 1996. Looking back and judging our predecessors, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6(3): 251–270.
Beecher, H.K. 1966. Ethics and clinical research, New England Journal of Medicine 274(24): 1354–1360.
Benedek, T.G. and Erlen J. 1999. The scientific environment of the Tuskegee Study of Syphilis, 1920–1960, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 43(1): 1–30.
Blumgart, H.L. 1969. The medical framework for viewing the problem of human experimentation. In: Experimentation With Human Subjects,ed. Freund, P.A., pp 39–65. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Bower, T. 1987. The Paperclip Conspiracy: The Battle for the Spoils and Secrets of Nazi Germany. M. Joseph: London.
Brackman, A.C. 1988. The Other Nuremberg: The Untold Story of the Tokyo War Crimes Trials. Quill: New York.
Bynum, W. 1988. Reflections on the history of human experimentation. In: The Use of Human Beings in Research: With Special Reference to Clinical Trials, ed. Spicker, S.F., pp 29–46. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Callahan, D. 2003. What Price Better Health? Hazards of the Research Imperative. University of California Press: Berkeley.
Caplan, A.L. 1988. Is there an obligation to participate in biomedical research? In: The Use of Human Beings in Research: With Special Reference to Clinical Trials, ed. Spicker, S.F., pp 229–48. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Caplan, A.L. 1992. Twenty years after. The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. When evil intrudes, Hastings Center Report 22(6): 29–32.
CIOMS. 2002.International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS.
Commission for Macroeconomics and Health. 2001. Macroeconomics and Health: Investing in Health for Economic Development. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Foster, C. 2001. The Ethics of Medical Research on Humans.Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Freedman, B. 1987. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research, New England Journal of Medicine 317(3): 141–145.
Funding First. 2002. Exceptional Returns: The Economic Value of America's Investment in Medical Research.
Gatter, R. 2003. Walking the talk of trust in human subjects research: The challenge of regulating financial conflicts of interest, Emory Law Journal 52: 327–401.
Gifford, F. 2001. Uncertainty about clinical equipoise. Clinical equipoise and the uncertainty principles both require further scrutiny, British Medical Journal 322(7289): 795.
Gunn, M.J. et al. 2000. Medical Research and Incompetent Adults, Journal of Mental Health Law 61–74.
House of Commons Health Committee (UK). 2005. The Influence of the Pharmaceutical Industry.
Illingworth, P.M.L. 2005. Trusting Medicine: The Moral Cost of Managed Care. Routledge: New York.
Institute of Medicine. 2001. Preserving trust: Accreditation and human research participation protection programs. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Institute of Medicine. 2004. Ethical Conduct of Clinical Research Involving Children. National Academy Press: Washington, DC.
Jonas, H. 1969. Philosophical reflections on experimenting with human subjects, Daedalus 98(2): 219–247.
Kahn, J. 1999. Equipoise and the problem of research subjects with diminished capacity, Accountability in Research 7(2–4): 277–282.
Karlawish, J.H. and Lantos J. 1997. Community equipoise and the architecture of clinical research, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6(4): 385–396.
Kass, N.E. et al. 1996. Trust, The fragile foundation of contemporary biomedical research, Hastings Center Report 26(5): 25-29.
Katz, J. 1969. The education of the physician-investigator, Daedalus 98(2): 480–501.
Katz, J. 1993. Human experimentation and human rights, St.Louis University Law Journal 38(1): 7–54.
Katz, J., Capron A.M. and Glass E.S. 1972. Experimentation with Human Beings: The Authority of the Investigator, Subject, Professions, and State in the Human Experimentation Process. Russell Sage Foundation: New York.
Lederer, S.E. 1995. Subjected to Science: Human Experimentation in America before the Second World War. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.
Lewis, P. 2002. Procedures that are Against the Medical Interests of Incompetent Adults, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22(4): 575–618.
Macklin, R. and Sherwin S. 1975. Experimenting on human subjects: Philosophical perspectives, Case Western Reserve Law Review 25(3): 434–471.
Marks, H.M. 1997. The Progress of Experiment: Science and Therapeutic Reform in the United States, 1900–1990. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge England.
McCormick, R.A. 1974. Proxy consent in the experimentation situation, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 18(1): 2–20.
McCormick, R.A. 1976. Experimentation in children: sharing in sociality, Hastings Center Report 6(6): 41–46.
NHMRC. 1999. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans.National Health and Medical Research Council: Canberra.
Ramsey, P. 1970. The Patient as Person.Yale University Press: New Haven.
Ramsey, P. 1976. The enforcement of morals: nontherapeutic research on children,Hastings Center Report 6(4): 21–30.
Ramsey, P. 1977. Children as research subjects: a reply, Hastings Center Report 7(2): 40–42.
Rosenberg, L.E. 2002. Exceptional economic returns on investments in medical research, Medical Journal of Australia 177(7): 368–371.
Rothman, D.J. 1991. Strangers at the Bedside: A History of How Law and Bioethics Transformed Medical Decision Making. BasicBooks: New York.
Thomasma, D.C. 1996. A communal model for presumed consent for research on the neurologically vulnerable, Accountability in Research 4(3–4): 227–239.
Thomasma, D.C. 2000. A model of community substituted consent for research on the vulnerable, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3(1): 47–57.
Thomasma, D.C. 2001. Community Consent for Research on the Impaired Elderly. In: Aging: Decisions at the End of Life,eds. Weisstub, D.N. Thomasma D.C., Gauthier S., and Tomossy G.F., pp 207–26. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Tomossy, G.F. 2006. Vulnerability in research. In: Disputes and Dilemmas in Health Law,eds. Freckelton, I. and Petersen K., pp 534–59. Sydney: Federation Press.
Tomossy, G.F. and Weisstub D.N. 1997. The reform of adult guardianship laws: the case of non-therapeutic experimentation, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 20(1): 113–139.
Tri-Council. 1998. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Ottawa, Ministry of Supply and Services.
Verdun-Jones, S.N. and Weisstub D.N. 1998. Drawing the Distinction Between Therapeutic Research and Non-Therapeutic Experimentation: Clearing a Way Through the Definitional Thicket. In: Research on Human Subjects: Ethics, Law, and Social Policy,ed. Weisstub, D.N., pp 111–36. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Weisstub, D.N. 1998. The ethical parameters of experimentation. In: Research on Human Subjects: Ethics, Law, and Social Policy,ed. Weisstub, D.N., pp 1–34. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Weisstub, D.N., Arboleda-Florez J., and Tomossy G.F. 1998. Establishing the boundaries of ethically permissible research with vulnerable populations. In: Research on Human Subjects: Ethics, Law, and Social Policy,ed. Weisstub, D.N., pp 355–79. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Weisstub, D.N., Thomasma D.C., Gauthier S., and Tomossy G.F. (eds), 2001a. Aging: Caring for Our Elders.Kluwer: Dordrecht.
Weisstub, D.N., Thomasma D.C., Gauthier S., and Tomossy G.F. (eds), 2001b. Aging: Culture, Health and Social Change. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
Weisstub, D.N., Thomasma D.C., Gauthier S., and Tomossy G.F. (eds), 2001c. Aging: Decisions at the End of Life. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
Williams, P., Wallace D., 1989. Unit 731: Japan’s Secret Biological Warfare in World War II. Free Press: New York.
Yarborough, M. and Sharp R.R. 2002. Restoring and preserving trust in biomedical research, Academic Medicine 77(1): 8–14.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tomossy, G.F. (2008). Human Rights, Health Care And Biomedical Innovation: Confronting The Research Imperative. In: Autonomy and Human Rights in Health Care. International Library Of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5841-7_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5841-7_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5840-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5841-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)