Skip to main content

Two-Way Crossed Classification with Interaction

  • Chapter
Analysis of Variance for Random Models

Abstract

The two-way crossed model considered in Chapter 3 uses the simple additive model, which makes an important assumption that the value of the difference between the mean responses at two levels of A is the same at each level B. However, in many situations, this simple additive model may not be appropriate. When the differences between the mean response at different levels of A tend to vary over the different levels of B, it is said that the two factors interact. If an experimenter makes more than one observation per cell, it permits him to investigate not only the main effects of both factors but also their interaction. In this chapter, we consider a two-way crossed model with more than one observation per cell, which allows the investigation of interaction terms between the two factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • D. M. Andrews and A. Herzberg (1985), Data: A Collection of Problems from Many Fields for Students and Research Workers, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. N. Arvesen (1976), Anote on the Tukey-Hooke variance components results, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. (Japan), 28, 111–121.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • N. J. Birch and R. K. Burdick (1989), Confidence intervals on the ratios of expected mean squares (θ1 + θ2 + θ3)/θ4, Statist. Probab. Lett, 7, 335–342.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • G. E. P. Box and G. C. Tiao (1973), Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Bozivich, T. A. Bancroft, and H. O. Hartley (1956), Power of analysis of variance test procedures for certain incompletely specified model, Ann. Math. Statist., 27, 1017–1043.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • L. D. Broemeling (1969a), Confidence intervals for measures of heritability, Biometrics, 25, 424–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. D. Broemeling (1969b), Confidence intervals for variance ratios of random model, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 64, 660–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. K. Burdick and F. A. Graybill (1992), Confidence Intervals on Variance Components, Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. K. Burdick and G. A. Larsen (1997), Confidence intervals on means of variability in R&R studies, J. Qual. Tech., 29, 261–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • O. L. Davies and P. L. Goldsmith, eds. (1972), Statistical Methods in Research and Production, 4th ed., Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. K. Dolezal, R. K. Burdick, and N. J. Birch (1998), Analysis of two-factor R&R study with fixed operators, J. Qual. Tech., 30, 163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. H. Gautschi (1959), Some remarks on Herbach’s paper, “Optimum nature of the F-test for Model II in the balanced case,” Ann. Math. Statist., 30, 960–963.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • F. A. Graybill (1976), Theory and Application of the Linear Model, Duxbury, North Scituate, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. A. Graybill and C.-M. Wang (1980), Confidence intervals on nonnegative linear combinations of variances, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 75, 869–873.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • R. Gui, F. A. Graybill, R. K. Burdick, and N. Ting (1995), Confidence intervals on ratios of linear combinations for non-disjoint sets of expected mean squares, J. Statist. Plann. Inference, 48, 215–227.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • L. H. Herbach (1959), Properties of Model II type analysis of variance tests A: Optimum nature of the F-test for Model II in the balanced case, Ann. Math. Statist., 30, 939–959.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • W. G. S. Hines (1996), Pragmatics of pooling in ANOVA tables, Amer. Statist., 50, 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. R. Hocking, J. W. Green, and R. H. Bremer (1989), Variance component estimation with model-based diagnostics, Technometrics, 31, 227–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Hooke (1956), Some applications of biopolykays to the estimation of variance components and their moments, Ann. Math. Statist., 27, 80–98.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • D. G. Janky (2000), Sometimes pooling for analysis of variance hypothesis tests: A review and study of a split-plot model, Amer. Statist., 54, 269–279.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • H. Jeffreys (1961), Theory of Probability, 3rd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK; 1st ed., 1939; 2nd ed., 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. I. Khuri (1981), Simultaneous confidence intervals for functions of variance components in random models, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 76, 878–885.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • A. W. Kimball (1951), On dependent tests of significance in the analysis of variance, Ann. Math. Statist, 22, 600–602.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • R. A. Leiva and F. A. Graybill (1986), Confidence intervals for variance components in the balanced two-way model with interaction, Comm. Statist. B Simul. Comput., 15, 301–322.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • R. Mead, T. A. Bancroft, and C. Hand (1975), Power of analysis of variance test procedures for incompletely specified fixed models, Ann. Statist., 3, 797–808.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • G. A. Milliken and D. E. Johnson (1992), Analysis of Messy Data, Vol. 1, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. C. Montgomery and G. C. Runger (1994), Gauge capability and designed experiments, Part II: Experimental design model and variance component estimation, Qual. Engrg., 6, 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Paark and R. K. Burdick (1998), Confidence intervals for the mean in a balanced two-factor random effets model, Comm. Statist. A Theory Methods, 27, 2807–2825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. E. Pauli (1950), On a preliminary test for pooling mean squares in the analysis of variance, Ann. Math. Statist., 21, 539–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Portnoy (1971), Formal Bayes estimation with application to arandom effects model, Ann. Math. Statist., 42, 1379–1402.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • C. V. Rao and K. P. Saxena (1979), A study of power of a test procedure based on two preliminary tests of significance, Estadística, 33, 201–214.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • H. Sahai (1974), Simultaneous confidence intervals for variance components in some balanced random effects models, Sankhyā Ser. B, 36, 278–287.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • H. Sahai and R. L. Anderson (1973), Confidence regions for variance ratios of random models for balanced data, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 68, 951–952.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • H. Sahai and A. A. Ramírez-Martínez (1978), Estimadores formales de Bayes en el modelo aleatorio general de clasificación doble cruzado, Trab. Estadist., 29, 88–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. A. Thompson, Jr. (1962), The problem of negative estimates of variance components, Ann. Math. Statist, 33, 273–289.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • W. A. Thompson, Jr. and J. R. Moore (1963), Non-negative estimates of variance components, Technometrics, 5, 441–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Ting, R. K. Burdick, and F. A. Graybill (1991), Confidence intervals on ratios of positive linear combinations of variance components, Statist. Probab. Lett, 11, 523–528.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • N. Ting, R. K. Burdick, F. A. Graybill, S. Jeyaratnam, and T.-F. C. Lu (1990), Confidence intervals on linear combinations of variance components that are unrestricted in sign, J. Statist. Comput. Simul, 35, 135–143.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • N. Ting and F. A. Graybill (1991), Approximate confidence interval on ratio of two variances in a two-way crossed model, Biometrical J., 33, 547–558.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • S. B. Vardeman and E. S. Van Valkenburg (1999), Two-way random-effects analyses and gauge in R&R studies, Technometrics, 41, 202–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. M. Wang (1994), On estimating approximate degrees of freedom of chi-squared approximations, Comm. Statist. B Simul. Comput, 23, 769–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. M. Wang and F. A. Graybill (1981), Confidence intervals on a ratio of variances in the two-factor nested components of variance model, Comm. Statist A Theory Methods, 10, 1357–1368.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • J. S. Williams (1962), A confidence interval for variance components, Biometrika, 49, 278–281.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • G. Wolde-Tsadik and A. A. Afifi (1980), A comparison of the “sometimes-pool,” “sometimes-switch,” and “never-pool” procedures in the two-way ANOVA random effects model, Technometrics, 22, 367–373.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • S. Wolfram (1996), The Mathematica Book, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sahai, H., Ojeda, M.M. (2004). Two-Way Crossed Classification with Interaction. In: Analysis of Variance for Random Models. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-8168-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-8168-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6470-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-8176-8168-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics