Abstract
The starting point of a researcher’s methodological choice within information systems is not so much a problem of how many methods we employ or if those are of a quantitative or a qualitative nature, but the ability to identify the philosophical and theoretical assumptions which leads to the choice of the appropriate methodology. In practice, despite the recognition of the virtues and the role of qualitative methods in information systems research, explicit institutional barriers and implicit functionalistic assumptions within the field have prevented much progress in their application. There is the danger in not recognizing the resulting side-effect where researchers use qualitative methods in a quantitative manner and pass it off as qualitative research. Using qualitative methods implies allowing and acknowledging the subjectivity of the research process, which should be looked upon as a strength rather than as a weakness.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Qualitative Research
- Research Process
- Qualitative Method
- Organizational Work
- Qualitative Research Method
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Acterberg, J. S.; van Es, G. A.; and Heng, M. S. H. (1991). “Information Systems Research in the Postmodern Period.” In H-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein, and R. Hirschheim (Editors), The Information Systems Research Arena of the 90s, Challenges, Perceptions and Alternative Approaches. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Alvesson, M. (1995). Management of Knowledge-Intensive Companies. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Antill, L. (1985). “Selection of a Research Method.” In E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald, and A. T. Wood-Harper (Editors), Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Backhouse, J.; Liebenau, J.; and Land, F. (1991). “On the Discipline of Information Systems.” Journal of Information Systems, Volume 1, pp. 19–27.
Banville, C., and Landry, M. (1989). “Can the Field of MIS be Disciplined?” Communications of the ACM„ Volume 32, pp. 48–61.
Baskerville, R. (1996). “The Second-Order Security Dilemma.” In W. J. Orlikowski, G. Walsham, M. R. Jones, and J. I. DeGross (Editors), Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work. London: Chapman and Hall.
Baskerville, R. L., and Wood-Harper, A. T. (1996). “A Critical Perspective on Action Research as a Method for Information Systems Research.” Journal of Information Technology, Volume 11.
Bell, S., and Sheppard, I. (1988). Application of a Systems Development Methodology in Less Developed Countries. Norwich, England: University of East Anglia.
Benbasat, I.; Goldstein, D. K.; and Mead, M. (1987). “The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems.” MIS Quarterly, Volume 11, Number 3, September, pp. 369–386.
Berger, P., and Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin.
Bikson, T. (1991). “Relevance versus Rigor in Information Systems Research: An Issue of Quality.” Panel Discussion chaired by J. A. Turner. In H-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein, and R. Hirschheim (Editors), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Boland, R. J, and Schultze, U. (1996). “From Work to Activiy: Technology and the Narrative of Progress.” In W. J. Orlikowski, G. Walsham, M. R. Jones, and J. I. DeGross (Editors), Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work. London: Chapman and Hall.
Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Unw in Hyman.
Burrell, G., and Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann.
Calloway, L. J., and Ariav, G. (1991). “Developing and Using a Qualitative Methodology to Study Relationships among Designers and Tools.” In H-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein and R. Hirschheim (Editors), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Cash, J., and Nunamaker, J. (1989). The Information Systems Research Challenge, Vol I: Qualitative Research Methods. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Cash, J., and Nunamaker, J. (1990). The Information Systems Research Challenge, Vol II: Qualitative Research Methods. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Cash, J., and Nunamaker, J. (1991). The Information Systems Research Challenge, Vol IH.: Qualitative Research Methods. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Cassell, C., and Symon, G. (1994). Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. London: Sage.
Clifford, J., and Marcus, G. E. (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cooper, R. (1988). “Review of Management Information Systems Research: A Management Support Emphasis.” Information Processing and Management, Volume 24, Number 1, pp. 73–102.
Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1991). “Culture is a Medium of Life.” In P. J. Frost, L. F. Moore, M. R. Louis, C. C. Lundberg and J. Martin (Editors), Reframing Organizational Culture. London: Sage.
Danzinger, K. (1979). “The Positivistic Repudiation of Wundt.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Volume 15, pp. 205–230.
Elejabarrieta, F. (1990). “La Rigurosidad metodologica y la precariedad teorica en Psicologia Social.” Quadern de Psicologia, Volume 10, pp. 143–160.
Felts, R. A. (1987). The Development of Information Systems in the Third World. M.Sc. Dissertation, London School of Economics.
Filstead, W. J. (1978). “Qualitative Methods: A Needed Perspective in Evaluation Research.” In T. D. Cook and C. S. Reichardt (Editors), Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverley Hills, California: Sage.
Flick, U. (1992). “Triangulation Revisited: Strategy of Validation or Alternative?” Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior, Volume 22, pp. 175–198.
Galliers, R. D. (1991). “Choosing Appropriate Information Systems Research Approaches: A Revised Taxonomy.” In H-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein and R. Hirschheim (Editors), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Galliers, R. D., and Land, F. L. (1987). “Choosing Appropriate Information Systems Research Methodologies.” Communications of the ACM, Volume 30, Number 11, pp. 900–902.
Geertz, C. (1988). Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford, California: California University Press.
Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
Grint, K.; Case, P.; and Willcocks, L. (1996). “Business Process Reengineering Reappraised: The Politics and Technology of Forgetting.” In W. J. Orlikowski, G. Walsham, M. R. Jones, and J.I. DeGross (Editors), Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work. London: Chapman and Hall.
Guerreiro-Ramos, A. (1981). The New Science of Organization. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Guilford, J. P., and Fruchter, B. (1978). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education. London: McGraw-Hill.
Hammersly, M. (1992). What is Wrong with Ethnography? Methodological Explorations. London: Routledge.
Hammersly, M., and Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.
Keen, P. G. W. (1987). “MIS Research: Current Status, Trends and Needs.” In R. A. Buckingham, R. A. Hirschheim, F. F. Land and C. J. Tully (Editors), Information Systems Education: Recommendations and Implementation. Cambridge, England: University Press.
Kirk, J., and Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research Methods Series, Volume 1. Beverley Hills, California: Sage.
Klein, H. K.; Hirschheim, R.; and Nissen, H-E. (1991). “A Pluralist Perspective of the Information Systems Research Arena.” In H-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein and R. Hirschheim (Editors), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Klein, H. K., and Lyytinen, K. (1985). “The Poverty of Scientism in Information Systems.” In E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald and A. T.Wood-Harper (Editors), Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Klein, H. K., and Myers, M. D. (1995). “The Quality of Interpretive Research in Information Systems.” Department of Management Science and Information Systems, University of Auckland, Working Paper No. 89, May.
Kling, R. (1991). “Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research.” Computing Surveys, Volume 12, Number 1, pp. 61110.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuutti, K. (1996). “Debates in IS and CSCW Research: Anticpating System Design for Post-Fordist Work.” In W. J. Orlikowslei, G. Walsham, M. R. Jones, and J. I. DeGross (Editors), Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work. London: Chapman and Hall.
Latour. B. (1988). “The Prince for Machines as Well as for Machinations.” In B. Elliot (Editor), Technology and Social Processes. Edemburg: Edemburg University Press.
Lee, A. (1989). “A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies.” MIS Quarterly, Volume 13, Number 1, pp. 33–50.
Madon, S. (1994). Designing Information Systems for Development Planning. Henley-on-Thames, England: Alfred Waller Ltd.
Markova, I. (1982). Paradigms, Thought and Language. Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons.
MISDOC-L (1995). IS Doctoral Mailing List. http://web.bu.edu:80/SMGMIS/ misdoc-1.
Morgan, G. (Editor) (1983). Beyond Method. Beverley Hills, California: Sage.
Morgan, G., and Smircich. L. (1980). “The Case for Qualititative Research.” Academy of Management Review, Volume 5, Number 4, pp. 491–500.
Mumford, E. (1987). “Managerial Expert Systems and Organizational Change: Some Critical Research Issues.” In R. J. Boland and R. A. Hirschheim (Editors), Critical Issues in Information Systems Research. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 135–156.
Mumford, E. (1991). “Information Systems Research-Leaking Craft or Visionary Vehicle?” In H. E. Nissen, H. K. Klein, and R. Hirschheim (Editors), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Mumford, E.; Hirschheim, R.; Fitzgerald, G.; and Wood-Harper, A. T. (Editors) (1985). Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Nelson, C.; Treichler, P. A.; and Grossberg, L. (1992). “Cultural Studies.” In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson and P. A. Treichner (Editors), Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge.
Nissen, HE. (1985). “Acquiring Knowledge of Information Systems: Research in a Methodological Quagmire.” In E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald and A.T. Wood-Harper (Editors), Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 39–51.
Nissen, H-E., Klein, H. K.; and Hirschheim, R. (Editors) (1991). Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Olaisen, J. (1991). “Pluralism or Positivistic Trivialism: Important Trends in Contemporary Philosophy of Science” In H-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein and R. Hirschheim (Editors), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Oppenheimer, J. R. (1954). “Analogy in Science.” American Psychologist, Volume 11, pp. 127–135.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1991). “Relevance versus Rigor in Information Systems Research: An Issue of Quality.” Panel Discussion chaired by J. A. Turner. In H-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein, and R. Hirschheim (Editors), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1993). “CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development.” MIS Quarterly, Volume 17, Number 3, pp. 309–450.
Orlikowski, W. J., and Baroudi, J. (1990). “Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions.” Sloan Management School, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Working Paper.
Polanyi, M. (1964). Science, Faith and Society: A Searching Examination of the Meaning and Nature of Scientific Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Preston, A. M. (1991). “The `Problem’ in and of Management Information Systems.” Journal of Accounting, Management and Information Technology, Volume 1, Number 1, pp. 43–69.
Reed, M. (1985). Redirections in Organizational Analysis. London: Tavistock. Riley, P. (1991). “Cornerville as Narration.” In P. J. Frost, L. F. Moore, M. R. Louis, C. C. Lundberg and J. Martin (Editors), Reframing Organizational Culture. London: Sage.
Said, E. W. (1989). “Representing the Colonized: Anthopology’s Interlocutors.” Critical Inquiry, Volume 15, pp. 205–255.
Spielberg, H. (1972). Phenomenology in Psychology and Psychiatry: A Historical Introduction. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. London: Sage.
Thompson, J. B. (1990). Ideology and Modern Culture. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
Toraskar, K. V. (1991). “How Managerial Users Evaluate Their Decision Support: A Grounded Theory Approach.” In H-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein and R. Hirschheim (Editors), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Van Maanen, J. (1979). “Reclaiming Qualitative Methods for Organizational Research: A Preface.” Administrative Science Quarterly, Volume 24, pp. 520–26.
Vidgen, R., and McMaster, T. (1996). “Black Boxes, Non-human Stakeholders and the Translation of IT Through Mediation.” In W. J. Orlikowski, G. Walsham, M. R. Jones, and J. I. DeGross (Editors), Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work. London: Chapman and Hall.
Vidich, A. J., and Lyman, S. M. (1994). “Qualitative Methods: Their History in Sociology and Anthropology.” In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Editors), Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Vogel, D. R., and Wetherbe, J. C. (1984). “MIS research: A Profile of Leading Journals and Universities.” DataBase, Volume 16, Number 3.
Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. Chichester, England: Wiley.
Walsham, G. (1995). “Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and Method.” European Journal of Information Systems, Volume 4, pp. 74–81.
Weill, P., and Olson, M. H. (1989). “An Assessment of the Contingency Theory of Management Information Systems.” Journal of Management Information Systems, Volume 6, Number 1, pp. 59–86.
Westrup, C. (1996). “Transforming Organizations Through Systems Analysis: Developing New Techniques for Organizational Analysis in IS Development.” In W. J. Orlikowski, G. Walsham, M. R. Jones, and J. I. DeGross (Editors), Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work. London: Chapman and Hall.
Wood-Harper, A. T. (1985). “Research Methods in Information Systems: Using Action Research.” In E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald and A. T. Wood-Harper (Editors), Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research, Design and Methods, Second Edition. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.
Zuboff, S. (1996). “The Emperor’s New Information Technology.” In W. J. Orlikowski, G. Walsham, M. R. Jones, and J. I. DeGross (Editors), Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work. London: Chapman and Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Garcia, L., Quek, F. (1997). Qualitative Research in Information Systems: Time to be Subjective?. In: Lee, A.S., Liebenau, J., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Information Systems and Qualitative Research. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35309-8_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35309-8_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5487-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35309-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive