Abstract
Presently, modern spring gravimeters are the most flexible, technically simple, and comparatively cheap solution for recordings over extended time periods in contrast to superconducting gravimeters. We investigate the accuracy of the state-of-the-art spring gravimeters Micro-g LaCoste gPhone-98 and ZLS Burris Gravity Meter B-64 of the Institut für Erdmessung (IfE). With both instruments gravity was recorded for periods of several months at five stations with high and low microseismic noise. Simultaneous measurements with both instruments as well as the parallel recording of the ZLS Burris gravimeter with the GWR Instruments Observatory Superconducting Gravimeter OSG-054 in Onsala (Sweden) are investigated. Tidal analysis is used to assess the quality of the time series. Diurnal and semi-diurnal amplitude factors agree at the level of 1 
and better from recordings of Burris and OSG gravimeters in Onsala. In addition to gravity recordings a number of calibration experiments were carried out to test the long-term stability of the meters. The linear calibration factor of both gravimeters is stable to 3 × 10−4. The drift of the gPhone-98 decreased over time and is currently reduced with a linear factor of \(\approx 90\) nm/s2 per day. The instrumental drift of Burris B-64 on the other hand can currently not be reduced with a linear factor.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Jentzsch G (2008) The automated Burris Gravity Meter-a new instrument using an old principle. In: Proceedings of symposium on terrestrial gravimetry static and mobile measurements, St Petersburg, pp 20–23
Jiang Z, Pálinkáš V, Francis O, Jousset P, Mäkinen J, Merlet S, Becker M, Coulomb A, Kessler-Schulz KU, Schulz HR, Rothleitner C, Tisserand L, Lequin D (2012) Relative gravity measurement campaign during the 8th International Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters (2009). Metrologia 49(1):95–107. doi:10.1088/0026-1394/49/1/014
LaCoste & Romberg, Inc. (2004) Instruction manual Model G and D gravity meters. LaCoste & Romberg, Inc., Austin
Mammadov S, Jahr T, Jentzsch G, Kadirov F (2011) Primary results of new gravity station Shaki/Azerbaijan. Bull d’Inf Marées Terrest 147:11881–11890
Micro-g LaCoste (2008) gPhone/P.E.T Hardware Manuel V1. Micro-g LaCoste, Lafayette
Olsson PA, Scherneck HG, Ågren J (2009) Effects on gravity from non-tidal sea level variations in the Baltic Sea. J Geodyn 48(3–5):151–156. doi:10.1016/j.jog.2009.09.002
Riccardi U, Rosat S, Hinderer J (2011) Comparison of the Micro-g LaCoste gPhone-054 spring gravimeter and the GWR-C026 superconducting gravimeter in Strasbourg (France) using a 300-day time series. Metrologia 48(1):28–39. doi:10.1088/0026-1394/48/1/003
Richter B, Wenzel HG (1991) Precise instrumental phase lag determination by the step response method. Bull d’Inf Marées Terrest 111:8032–8052
Scherneck HG (2008) Status report to the Global Geodynamics Project: superconducting gravimeter station at the Onsala Space Observatory. The national facility for radio astronomy in Sweden. Technical Report, Onsala Space Observatory
Timmen L (2010) Absolute and relative gravimetry. In: Xu G (ed) Sciences of geodesy - I. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–48. doi:http:10.1007/978-3-642-11741-1_1
Timmen L, Gitlein O (2004) The capacity of the Scintrex Autograv CG-3M no. 4492 gravimeter for “absolute-scale” surveys. Revista Brasileira de Cartografia 56(2):89–95
Timmen L, Wenzel HG (1995) Worldwide synthetic gravity tide parameters. In: Sünkel H, Marson I (eds) Gravity and geoid. International Association of Geodesy symposia, vol 113. Springer, Berlin, pp 92–101. doi:http:10.1007/978-3-642-79721-7_11
Van Camp M, Vauterin P (2005) Tsoft: graphical and interactive software for the analysis of time series and earth tides. Comput Geosci 31(5):631–640
Wenzel HG (1996) The nanogal software: Earth tide data processing package ETERNA 3.30. Bull d’Inf Marées Terrest 124:9425–9439
ZLS Corporation (2011) User guide: Burris Gravity Meter and UltraGrav control system. ZLS Corporation, Austin
Acknowledgements
This work was in part funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG, MU 1141/16-1). The Centre for Quantum Engineering and Space-Time-Research (QUEST) provided funding for the gPhone-98. The authors thank Hans-Georg Scherneck and the Onsala Space Observatory for hosting our instrument and providing gravity and environmental data, and the Leibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics for the cooperation in Hamburg.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schilling, M., Gitlein, O. (2015). Accuracy Estimation of the IfE Gravimeters Micro-g LaCoste gPhone-98 and ZLS Burris Gravity Meter B-64. In: Rizos, C., Willis, P. (eds) IAG 150 Years. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 143. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24603-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30895-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)