Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analytic hierarchy models for regional groundwater monitoring well allocation in Southeast Asian countries and South Korea

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater has played an important role in economic development in Southeast Asian countries, but some problems caused by nature or human actions such as contamination, over pumping, and land subsidence bring the necessity of more systematic groundwater monitoring wells. The analytical hierarchy process with pairwise comparison was used to allocate and organize the regional groundwater monitoring wells in five regions, Thailand, Cambodia, East/West Malaysia, and South Korea. Five different multi criteria decision models, which were composed of three primary criteria and eight secondary criteria, were developed based on the answers of the questionnaire from 76 groundwater experts in Thailand, 100 in Cambodia, 101 in East Malaysia, 87 in West Malaysia, and 93 in South Korea. It was revealed that the weights of model criteria for each country, which also represent relative importance on groundwater monitoring, were different according to the diverse groundwater situation. The most important factor to determine the number of monitoring well was ‘number of households using only groundwater as a water source’ for Thailand and South Korea, ‘number of contamination sources’ for Cambodia, ‘amount of groundwater use for drinking-water supply’ for East Malaysia, and ‘number of wells with contaminated water’ for West Malaysia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berg M, Stengel C, Trang PTK, Viet PH, Sampson ML, Leng M, Samreth S, Fredericks D (2007) Magnitude of arsenic pollution in the Mekong and Red River Deltas-Cambodia and Vietnam. Sci Total Environ 372:413–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CCOP (Coordinating Committee for Geoscience Programmes in East, Southeast Asia) (2007) Annual report 2006. Bangkok, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon W, Chiswell B (1996) Review of aquatic monitoring program design. Water Resour Res 30(9):1935–1948

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE (Department of Environment) (2006) Malaysia environmental quality report 2005. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Kuala Lumpur

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman JR, Jin W, Kyem PAK, Toledano J (1995) Raster procedures four multi-criteria/multi-objective decisions. Photogram Eng Rem Sens 61(5):539–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman PR, Rosenboom JW (2001) Cambodia drinking water quality assessment. World Health Organization of the UN (WHO) in cooperation with Cambodian Ministry of Rural Development and the Ministry of Industry. Mines and Energy, Phnom Penh

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman PR, Rosenboom JW, Saray M, Navuth P, Samnang C, Iddings S (2007) Assessment of the chemical quality of drinking water in Cambodia. J Water Health 5(1):101–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafeez K, Zhang Y, Malak N (2002) Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytical hierarchy process. Int J Product Econ 76:39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heng CL (2004) Member country report of Malaysia: The 41th Annual Session of Coordinating Committee for Geoscience Programmes in East and Southeast Asia. Tsukuba, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Jandric Z, Srdjevic B (2000) Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in selecting best groundwater pond. 31st International Geological Congress, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp 6–17

  • Javaheri H, Nasrabadi T, Jafarian MH, Rowshan GR, Khoshnam H (2006) Site selection of municipal solid waste landfills using analytical hierarchy process method in a geographical information technology environment in Giroft. Iranian J Environ Health Sci Eng 3(3):177–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Jousma G (2006) Guideline on: groundwater monitoring for general reference purposes. IGRAC (International Groundwater Resources Assessment Centre), Utrecht, The Netherlands

  • Kallas Z, Gomez-Limon JA, Hurle JB (2007) Decomposing the value of agricultural multifunctionality: combining contingent valuation and the analytical hierarchy process. J Agric Econ 58(2):218–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim GB (2005) Nationwide monitoring and assessment of groundwater in Korea. Seoul, Korea

  • Kim GB, Lee KK, Lee JY, Yi MJ (2007a) Case study for determination of a water level monitoring frequency for nationwide groundwater monitoring networks in Korea. J Hydrol 342:223–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JW, Lee JY, Yi MJ, Kim GB, Won JH, Lee KK (2007b) Allocating local groundwater monitoring stations for South Korea using an analytical hierarchy process. Hydrogeol J 15:615–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knopman D, Voss C (1989) Multi-objective sampling design for parameter estimation and model discrimination in groundwater solute transport. Water Resour Res 25(10):2245–2258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane EF, Verdini WA (1989) A consistency test for AHP decision makers. Decision Sci 20(3):575–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Yi MJ, Yoo YK, Ahn KH, Kim GB, Won JH (2007) A review of the national groundwater monitoring network in Korea. Hydrol Proc 21:907–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy JK, Hartmann J, Li KW, An Y, Asgary A (2007) Multi-criteria decision support systems for flood hazard mitigation and emergency response in urban watersheds. JAWRA (J American Water Resour Assoc) 43(2):346–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luria P, Aspinall PA (2003) Evaluating a multi-criteria model for hazard assessment in urban design: the Proto Marghera case study. Environ Impact Assess Rev 23:625–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamit JD (2007) Strategic management of water resources in Malaysia. The 13th General Assembly of Asia-Pacific Parliamentarians’ Conference on Environment and Development (APPCED), Islamabad, Pakistan

  • MNRE (Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment) (2005) Thailand: Partnership for development. Bangkok, Thailand

  • MOCT (Ministry of Construction and Transportation) (2002) Master plan for groundwater management of Korea. Daejon, Korea

  • MOCT (Ministry of Construction and Transportation) (2006) Annual report of groundwater in Korea. Seoul, Korea

  • Peng P, Pin N (2003) Groundwater contamination in Cambodia, ESCAP-IWMI seminar on environmental and public health risks due to contamination of soils, crops, surface and groundwater from urban, industrial and natural sources in South East Asia. IWMI (International Water Management Institute) and USESCAP (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific), Bangkok, Thailand

  • Phien-wej N, Giao PH, Nutalaya P (2006) Land subsidence in Bangkok, Thailand. Eng Geol 82(4):187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polya DA, Gault AG, Diebe N, Feldman P, Rosenboom JW, Gilligan E, Fredericks D, Milton AH, Sampson M, Rowland HAL, Lythgoe PR, Jones JC, Middleton C, Cooke DA (2005) Arsenic hazard in shallow Cambodian groundwaters. Mineral Mag 69(5):807–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed P, Minsker B, Valocchi AJ (2000) Cost effective long term groundwater monitoring design using a genetic algorithm and global mass interpolation. Water Resour Res 36(12):3731–3741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenboom JW (2004) Arsenic in Asia: a regional overview, People-centered approaches to water and environmental sanitation. 30th WEDC International Conference, Vientiane, Lao PDR, pp 625–628

  • Roy B (1996) Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Kluwer, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resources allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1994) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24(6):19–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1999) Decision making for readers: the analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world, 3rd edn. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Srdjevic B, Jandric Z, Potkonjak S (2000) Evaluation of potential reservoir purpose by analytic hierarchy process. J Vodoprivreda 32:183–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen F (2002) GW-Mate case profile collection, Thailand: strengthening capacity in groundwater resources management. The World Bank, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank (2003) Cambodia environment monitor 2003. Washington DC, USA

  • The World Bank (2005a) Towards a more effective operational response—Arsenic contamination of groundwater in South and East Asian Countries. Vol I. Policy Report. Washington DC, USA

  • The World Bank (2005b) Towards a more effective operational response—Arsenic contamination of groundwater in South and East Asian Countries, Vol II. Technical Report. Washington DC, USA

  • UNESCO (2003) World water development report: water for people water for life. UNESCO Publishing and Berghahn Books, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2006) Water: a shared responsibility, the United Nations world water development report 2. Berghahn Books, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • WEPA (Water Environmental Partnership in Asia) (2007) State of water environmental issues: Malaysia. http://www.wepa-db.net/policies/state/malaysia/groundwater.htm

  • Zhou Y (1996) Sampling frequency of monitoring the actual state of groundwater systems. J Hydrol 180:301–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gyoo-Bum Kim.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, GB., Ahn, JS. & Marui, A. Analytic hierarchy models for regional groundwater monitoring well allocation in Southeast Asian countries and South Korea. Environ Earth Sci 59, 325–338 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0029-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0029-1

Keywords

Navigation