Skip to main content
Log in

Survival of Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at 5 to 23 Years

  • Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Recent literature suggests patients achieve substantial short-term functional improvement after combined bicompartmental implants but longer-term durability has not been documented. We therefore asked whether (1) bicompartmental arthroplasty (either combined medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and femoropatellar arthroplasty (PFA) or medial UKA/PFA, or combined medial and lateral UKA or bicompartmental UKA) reliably improved Knee Society pain and function scores; (2) bicompartmental arthroplasty was durable (survivorship, radiographic loosening, or symptomatic disease progression); (3) we could achieve durable alignment; and (4) the arthritis would progress in the unresurfaced compartment. We retrospectively reviewed 84 patients (100 knees) with bicompartmental UKA and 71 patients (77 knees) with medial UKA/PFA. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed at a minimum followup of 5 years (mean, 12 years; range, 5–23 years). Bicompartmental arthroplasty reliably alleviated pain and improved function. Prosthesis survivorship at 17 years was 78% in the bicompartmental UKA group and 54% in the medial UKA/PFA group. The high revision rate, compared with total knee arthroplasty, may be related to several factors such as implant design, patient selection, crude or absent instrumentation, or component malalignment, which can all contribute to the relatively high failure rate in this series.

Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3A–B
Fig. 4A–D

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahlback S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1968;Suppl 277:7–72.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW. The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1328–1335.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac JM. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:2235–2239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Argenson JN, Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: an update. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:50–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Argenson JN, Guillaume JM, Aubaniac JM. Is there a place for patellofemoral arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;321:162–167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Aubaniac JM, Dennis DA, Northcut EJ, Anderson DT, Agostini S. In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:1049–1054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Banks SA, Fregly BJ, Boniforti F, Reinschmidt C, Romagnoli S. Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13:551–556.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Sheinkop MB, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. The progression of patellofemoral arthrosis after medial unicompartmental replacement: results at 11 to 15 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:92–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cloutier JM, Sabouret P, Deghrar A. Total knee arthroplasty with retention of both cruciate ligaments. A nine to eleven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:697–702.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Cerveri P, De Momi E. Bi-unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty: a matched paired study with early clinical results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Aug 12 [Epub ahead of print].

  11. Cooke D, Scudamore A, Li J, Wyss U, Bryant T, Costigan P. Axial lower-limb alignment: comparison of knee geometry in normal volunteers and osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1997;5:39–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooke TD, Scudamore RA, Bryant JT, Sorbie C, Siu D, Fisher B. A quantitative approach to radiography of the lower limb. Principles and applications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:715–720.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dennis MG, Di Cesare PE. Surgical management of the middle age arthritic knee. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2003;61:172–178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Engh GA. A bi-compartmental solution: what the Deuce? Orthopedics. 2007;30:770–771.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN. A 12-28-year followup study of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:91–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fuchs S, Tibesku CO, Frisse D, Genkinger M, Laass H, Rosenbaum D. Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13:197–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fuchs S, Tibesku CO, Genkinger M, Laass H, Rosenbaum D. Proprioception with bicondylar sledge prostheses retaining cruciate ligaments. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;406:148–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fuchs S, Tibesku CO, Genkinger M, Volmer M, Laass H, Rosenbaum D. Clinical and functional comparison of bicondylar sledge prostheses retaining all ligaments and constrained total knee replacement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon.) 2004;19:263–269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gibson PH, Goodfellow JW. Stress radiography in degenerative arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68:608–609.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goodfellow JW, O’Connor J. Clinical results of the Oxford Knee: surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;205:21–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hanssen AD, Stuart MJ, Scott RD, Scuderi GR. Surgical options for the middle-aged patient with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:499–511.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Insall J, Walker P. Unicondylar knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;120:83–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric observation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kennedy WR, White RP. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;221:278–285.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Koff MF, Parratte S, Amrami KK, Kaufman KR. Examiner repeatability of patellar cartilage T(2) values. Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;27:131–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Komistek RD, Allain J, Anderson DT, Dennis DA, Goutallier D. In vivo kinematics for subjects with and without an anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:315–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ornetti P, Parratte S, Gossec L, Tavernier C, Argenson JN, Roos EM, Guillemin F, Maillefert JF. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in knee osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:423–428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pagnano MW, Clarke HD, Jacofsky DJ, Amendola A, Repicci JA. Surgical treatment of the middle-aged patient with arthritic knees. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:251–259.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rolston L, Bresch J, Engh G, Franz A, Kreuzer S, Nadaud M, Puri L, Wood D. Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a bone-sparing, ligament-sparing, and minimally invasive alternative for active patients. Orthopedics. 2007;30:70–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Roos EM, Lohmander LS. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Scott RD. Three decades of experience with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: mistakes made and lessons learned. Orthopedics. 2006;29:829–831.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sohn DH, Toth AP. Meniscus transplantation: current concepts. J Knee Surg. 2008;21:163–172.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stewart HD, Newton G. Long-term results of the Manchester knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;278:138–146.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Cloutier JM, Dennis DA. The cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty: a kinematic analysis of 2 total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:545–550.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Stuart MJ, Lubowitz JH. What, if any, are the indications for arthroscopic débridement of the osteoarthritic knee? Arthroscopy. 2006;22:238–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mrs Suzanne Aznavourian for clinical review of the patients.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Noel A. Argenson MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

About this article

Cite this article

Parratte, S., Pauly, V., Aubaniac, JM. et al. Survival of Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at 5 to 23 Years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 64–72 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1018-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1018-0

Keywords

Navigation