Abstract
Background
Previous studies have suggested that patients who are defined as so-called sweet eaters have more difficulties to lose weight and to maintain weight loss after both conservative treatment and restrictive bariatric surgery, such as gastric banding. There is, however, no agreement on the definition of sweet eating. Also, a questionnaire to measure sweet eating is not available. Therefore, the aim of our study was to agree on a definition of sweet eating and to construct a valid and reliable questionnaire that might be of help to assess the influence of sweet eating on weight loss after bariatric surgery.
Methods
A Delphi Study design was chosen to define sweet eating. Based on the Delphi rounds, a questionnaire with self-reported sweets intake was constructed and validated.
Results
Nine experts with different scientific backgrounds participated in the Delphi Study which consisted of four rounds. They finally agreed on the definition that sweet eating can be defined as an eating behavior in which at least 50% of daily consumed carbohydrates consist of simple carbohydrates and which can be triggered by emotional factors (i.e., stress). They did not include the intake of artificial sweeteners in the definition. The Dutch Sweet Eating Questionnaire built on the four Delphi rounds was tested in 138 female patients and appeared to be both valid and reliable.
Conclusion
A shortcoming of this study is that the results may not be applicable to males and to non-Western populations. The definition and the questionnaire may be useful in future research regarding sweet eating and bariatric surgery outcomes in morbidly obese patients.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.
Hörchner R, Tuinebreijer W, Kelder H. Eating patterns in morbidly obese patients before and after a gastric restrictive operation. Obes Surg. 2002;12(1):108–12(5).
Nugent C, Bai CH, Elariny H, et al. Metabolic syndrome after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1278–86.
Hudson S, Dixon J, O’Brien P. Sweet eating is not a predictor of outcome after lap-band® placement. Can we finally bury the myth? Obes Surg. 2002;12(6):789–94(6).
Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, Kern B, et al. Predictors of outcome in treatment of morbid obesity by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: results of a prospective study of 380 patients. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2008;4(4):500–6.
Sugerman HJ, Starkey JV, Birkenhauer R. A randomized prospective trial of gastric bypass versus vertical banded gastroplasty for morbid obesity and their effects on sweets versus non-sweets eaters. Annual Surgery. 1987;205(6):613–24.
Busetto L, Segato G, De Luca M, et al. Weight loss and postoperative complications in morbidly obese patients with binge eating disorder treated by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2005;15:195–201.
Dixon JB, O’Brien PE. Selecting the optimal patient for LAP-BAND placement. Am J Surg. 2002;184(6B):17S–20S.
van Strien T, Herman CP, Verheijden MW. Eating style, overeating, and overweight in a representative Dutch sample. Does external eating play a role? Appetite. 2009;52(2):380–7.
Smith ER, Mackie DM. Social psychology. 3rd ed. New York: Psychology Press; 2007.
Schmitt N, Oswald FL. The impact of corrections for faking on the validity of noncognitive measures in selection settings. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(3):613–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van den Heuvel, M., Hörchner, R., Wijtsma, A. et al. Sweet Eating: A Definition and the Development of the Dutch Sweet Eating Questionnaire. OBES SURG 21, 714–721 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0094-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0094-2