Skip to main content
Log in

Natural risk measures

  • Published:
Mathematics and Financial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A coherent risk measure with a proper continuity condition cannot be defined on a large set of random variables. However, if one relaxes the sub-additivity condition and replaces it with co-monotone sub-additivity, the proper domain of risk measures can contain the set of all random variables. In this study, by replacing the sub-additivity axiom of law invariant coherent risk measures with co-monotone sub-additivity, we introduce the class of natural risk measures on the space of all bounded-below random variables. We characterize the class of natural risk measures by providing a dual representation of its members.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This convexification can only be regarded as a technical extension since in [25] the authors have a different objective: to compare their co-monotone additive premium function in a competitive market with an arbitrage-free pricing rule, where additivity holds for all risks.

  2. Unlike in financial mathematics literature, which considers a profit variable, we found the loss variable more convenient to deal with.

  3. Càdlàg is a French acronym that translates into English as “right continuous and left limited”.

  4. The definition of a natural risk measure is motivated by the definition of a natural risk statistics introduced on \(\mathbb {R}^n\) in [17].

  5. Robust optimization is an approach to model uncertainty when the uncertain parameters are known to be within certain bounds. For more reading on the robust analysis approach, see [7, 20, 26, 27].

  6. In general, for any two topological vector spaces \(V,V'\) with bilinear dual relation \((v.v')\), \(\sigma (V,V')\) denotes the smallest topology on V under which all members of \(V'\) are continuous.

  7. \(\mathrm {supp}\left( \lambda \right) \) stands for support of \(\lambda \).

  8. \(\vert \mu \vert =\mu _{+}+\mu _{-}\) is the absolute value of \(\mu \).

  9. One would wonder why we use the term ‘statistics’ instead of ‘statistic.’ Actually, there is no reason except that it is the exact term that has been used in the literature; see, e.g. [1].

References

  1. Ahmed, S., Filipović, D., Svindland, G.: A note on natural risk statistics. Oper. Res. Lett. 36(6), 662–664 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Aliprantis, C.D., Burkinshaw, O.: Locally Solid Riesz Spaces, vol. 76. Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers], New York (1978)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., Heath, D.: Coherent measures of risk. Math. Financ. 9(3), 203–228 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Assa, H.: On optimal reinsurance policy with distortion risk measures and premiums. Insur. Math. Econ. 61, 70–75 (2015a)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Assa, H.: Risk management under a prudential policy. Decis. Econ. Financ. 38, 1–14 (2015b)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Assa, H., Karai, K.M.: Hedging, Pareto optimality, and good deals. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 157(3), 900–917 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bertsimas, D., Brown, D.B., Caramanis, C.: Theory and applications of robust optimization. SIAM Rev. 53(3), 464–501 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cai, J., Tan, K.S.: Optimal retention for a stop-loss reinsurance under the VaR and CTE risk measures. Astin Bull. 37(1), 93–112 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Cai, J., Tan, K.S., Weng, C., Zhang, Y.: Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CTE risk measures. Insur. Math. Econ. 43(1), 185–196 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Delbaen, F.: Coherent risk measures on general probability spaces. In: Sandmann, K., Schönbucher, P.J. (eds.) Advances in Finance and Stochastics, pp. 1–37. Springer, Berlin (2002)

  11. Denneberg, D.: Non-additive Measure and Integral, Volume 27 of Theory and Decision Library. Series B: Mathematical and Statistical Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Ekeland, I., Témam, R.: Convex Analysis and Variational Problems. Classics in Applied Mathematics. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Föllmer, H., Schied, A.: Robust preferences and convex measures of risk. In: Sandmann, K., Schönbucher, P.J. (eds.) Advances in Finance and Stochastics, pp. 39–56. Springer, Berlin (2002)

  14. Frittelli, M., Rosazza Gianin, E.: Putting order in risk measures. J. Bank. Financ. 26(7), 1473–1486 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Greco, G.H.: Sulla rappresentazione di funzionali mediante integrali. Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova 66, 21–42 (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Grothendieck, A.: Topological Vector Spaces. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. (Trans: From the French by Orlando Chaljub, Notes on Mathematics and its Applications), (1973)

  17. Kou, S., Peng, X., Heyde, C.C.: External risk measures and basel accords. Math. Oper. Res. 38(3), 393–417 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kusuoka, S.: On law invariant coherent risk measures. In: Kusuoka, S., Maruyama, T. (eds.) Advances in Mathematical Economics, vol. 3, pp. 83–95. Springer, Tokyo (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakano, Y.: Efficient hedging with coherent risk measure. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 293(1), 345–354 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Quaranta, A.G., Zaffaroni, A.: Robust optimization of conditional value at risk and portfolio selection. J. Bank. Financ. 32(10), 2046–2056 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rockafellar, R.T.: Convex analysis. Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Reprint of the 1970 original, Princeton Paperbacks, (1997)

  22. Royden, H.: Real Analysis. Mathematics and Statistics. Macmillan, London (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Rudin, W.: Real and Complex Analysis, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Rudin, W.: Functional Analysis. International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, S.S., Young, V.R., Panjer, H.H.: Axiomatic characterization of insurance prices. Insur. Math. Econ. 21(2), 173–183 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Xing, X., Hu, J., Yang, Y.: Robust minimum variance portfolio with l-infinity constraints. J. Bank. Financ. 46, 107–117 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zymler, S., Rustem, B., Kuhn, D.: Robust portfolio optimization with derivative insurance guarantees. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 210(2), 410–424 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hirbod Assa.

Additional information

The author would like to sincerely thank the reviewers and in particular the associate editor, Alexander Zimper, for their valuable comments, which considerably improved the quality of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Assa, H. Natural risk measures. Math Finan Econ 10, 441–456 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-016-0165-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-016-0165-9

Keywords

Navigation