Skip to main content
Log in

Societal views of pacemaker reutilization for those with untreated symptomatic bradycardia in underserved nations

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Significant healthcare disparities exist between the developed world and low and middle income countries (LMIC), specifically in the field of cardiac electrophysiology. As a result, pacemaker reutilization has been proposed as a viable option for those in LMIC and no other means of obtaining a device. Little data exist regarding the feasibility of establishing a reuse program in addition to understanding the views of society on device reutilization. This study investigated the views of funeral directors, patients with cardiac devices, and members of the general population regarding reutilization of previously implanted pacemakers.

Methods

Ninety funeral directors in Michigan were surveyed regarding current practice as well as preferences for post-mortem device disposal. One hundred and fourteen patients with devices and 1,009 members of the general population were surveyed regarding post-mortem device handling.

Results

Funeral directors had an average of 21 years of experience with an annual volume of 120 deceased persons per year, with a cremation rate of 35%. When asked about disposal methods of explanted devices, the majority of devices (84%) were discarded as medical waste or stored with no intended purpose, with a total of 171 devices currently in possession at the funeral homes. Eighty-nine percent of funeral directors expressed a desire to donate devices for reuse in LMIC and 10% acknowledged previous device donation. Eighty-seven percent of device patients and 71% of the general population also expressed a desire to donate devices.

Conclusions

The results of our survey show that a large percentage of funeral directors, patients with implantable devices, and members of the general population support a pacemaker reutilization initiative. This study lends further evidence that collection of devices for reuse is feasible and that establishing a framework for regional pacemaker reutilization program is warranted. If successful, the feasibility of this model should be investigated in other parts of the country in order to alleviate the burden of untreated symptomatic bradycardia in our world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Joshi, R., Jan, S., Wu, Y., & MacMahon, S. (2008). Global inequalities in access to cardiovascular health care: our greatest challenge. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 52(23), 1817–1825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mond, H. G., Irwin, M., Ector, H., & Proclemer, A. (2008). The world survey of cardiac pacing and cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2005 an International Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology Society (ICPES) project. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 31(9), 1202–1212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Anilkumar, R., & Balachander, J. (2004). Refurbishing pacemakers: a viable approach. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J, 4(1), 1–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baman, T. S., Romero, A., Kirkpatrick, J. N., Romero, J., Lange, D. C., Sison, E. O., et al. (2009). Safety and efficacy of pacemaker reuse in underdeveloped nations: a case series. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 54(16), 1557–1558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Costa, R., Moreira, L. F., Pego-Fernandes, P. M., Martinelli Filho, M. M., Stolf, N. A., Verginelli, G., et al. (1983). Reuse of pacemaker generators. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 40(5), 317–318.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Linde, C. L., Bocray, A., Jonsson, H., Rosenqvist, M., Radegran, K., & Ryden, L. (1998). Re-used pacemakers–as safe as new? A retrospective case-control study. European Heart Journal, 19(1), 154–157.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mond, H., Tartaglia, S., Cole, A., & Sloman, G. (1980). The refurbished pulse generator. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 3(3), 311–317.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mugica, J., Duconge, R., & Henry, L. (1986). Survival and mortality in 3, 701 pacemaker patients: arguments in favor of pacemaker reuse. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 9(6 Pt 2), 1282–1287.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Namboodiri, K. K., Sharma, Y. P., Bali, H. K., & Grover, A. (2004). Re-use of explanted DDD pacemakers as VDD—clinical utility and cost effectiveness. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J, 4(1), 3–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Panja, M., Sarkar, C. N., Kumar, S., Kar, A. K., Mitra, S., Sinha, D. P., et al. (1996). Reuse of pacemaker. Indian Heart Journal, 48(6), 677–680.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pringle, R. A., Leman, R. B., Kratz, J. M., & Gillette, P. C. (1986). An argument for pacemaker reuse: pacemaker mortality in 169 patients over ten years. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 9(6 Pt 2), 1295–1298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosengarten, M., Chiu, R., & Hoffman, R. (1989). A prospective trial of new versus refurbished cardiac pacemakers: a Canadian experience. The Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 5(3), 155–160.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosengarten, M. D., Portnoy, D., Chiu, R. C., & Paterson, A. K. (1985). Reuse of permanent cardiac pacemakers. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 133(4), 279–283.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sethi, K. K., Bhargava, M., Pandit, N., Mohan, J. C., Arora, R., Khanna, S. K., et al. (1992). Experience with recycled cardiac pacemakers. Indian Heart Journal, 44(2), 91–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Romero, J., Romero, A., Kirkpatrick, J. N., Lange, D. C., Eagle, K. A., & Baman, T. S. (2009). Pacemaker Reuse in a 65-year-old woman in the Philippines with severe medical need. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 33(1), e8–e9. 10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kirkpatrick, J. N., Burke, M. C., & Knight, B. P. (2006). Postmortem analysis and retrieval of implantable pacemakers and defibrillators. The New England Journal of Medicine, 354(15), 1649–1650.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirkpatrick, J. N., Ghani, S. N., Burke, M. C., & Knight, B. P. (2007). Postmortem interrogation and retrieval of implantable pacemakers and defibrillators: a survey of morticians and patients. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 18(5), 478–482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Romero J., Meier P., Gakenheimer L., Kirkpatrick, J.N., Sovitch, P., Oral, H., et al. (2010). “Pacemaker reutilization is a safe and effective means of delivering electrophysiological healthcare in Third World countries: a meta-analysis (Abstract P96)” Quality of Care and Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Scientific Sessions, Washington, DC

  19. Carlson, M. D., Wilkoff, B. L., Maisel, W. H., Ellenbogen, K. A., Saxon, L. A., Prystowsky, E. N., et al. (2006). Recommendations from the Heart Rhythm Society Task Force on Device Performance Policies and Guidelines Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the American Heart Association (AHA) and the International Coalition of Pacing and Electrophysiology Organizations (COPE). Heart Rhythm, 3(10), 1250–1273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mond, H. G., Mick, W., & Maniscalco, B. S. (2009). Heartbeat International: making “poor” hearts beat better. Heart Rhythm, 6(10), 1538–1540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Baman, T. S., Kirkpatrick, J. N., Romero, J., Gakenheimer, L., Romero, A., Lange, D. C., et al. (2010). Pacemaker reuse: an initiative to alleviate the burden of symptomatic bradyarrhythmia in impoverished nations around the world. Circulation, 122(16), 1649–1656.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kirkpatrick, J. N., Papini, C., Baman, T. S., Khota, K., Eagle, K. A., Verdino, R. J., et al. (2010). Reuse of pacemakers and defibrillators in developing countries: logistical, legal, and ethical barriers and solutions. Heart Rhythm, 7(11), 1623–1627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Grant support

Project My Heart–Your Heart Pacemaker Donation Initiative is supported by grants from the Hewlett Foundation, the Mardigian Foundation, University of Michigan Cardiovascular Center, and a gift from Sheldon Davis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timir S. Baman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gakenheimer, L., Lange, D.C., Romero, J. et al. Societal views of pacemaker reutilization for those with untreated symptomatic bradycardia in underserved nations. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 30, 261–266 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-010-9534-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-010-9534-0

Keywords

Navigation