Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of daylength, irradiance and settlement density on the growth and reproduction of Undaria pinnatifida gametophytes

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of daylength, irradiance and spore settlement density on the growth, maturation and sporophyte production of Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar gametophytes were examined using a factorial experimental design in culture. The growth of Undaria gametophytes increased with increasing daylength (8, 12 and 16 h), but the maximum fertility occurred at a daylength of 12 h followed by 8 and 16 h. Gametophytes grew better at the 16 h daylength under the same mean daily irradiance (MDI) of 20 μmol photons m−2 s−1. However, the fertility was higher at the short daylength (8 h), indicating that the maturation of U. pinnatifida gametophytes is influenced by daylength rather than by the MDI. Vegetative growth and sporophyte production of gametophytes were better at 60 μmol photons m−2 s−1 than at 30 μmol photons m−2 s−1 under a 8:16 h LD (Light: Dark) cycle, and their growth and maturation were density-dependant in 16 and 12 h daylength, respectively. These results suggest that the U. pinnatifida gametophytes require a certain amount of light for the growth and reproduction, and intraspecific competition occurred under the optimal growth and maturation conditions. However, the sporophyte recruits per unit has been enhanced with increasing spore settlement density at 8 and 12 h daylengths indicating that high settlement density gives a benefit for maintaining population, even though the sporophyte production of each female plant is inhibited. In conclusion, the vegetative growth, reproduction and sporophyte production of U. pinnatifida gametophytes are retarded at a low irradiance above growth saturation and a high settlement density, and are determined by daylength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akiyama K (1965) Studies of ecology and culture of Undaria pinnatifida (Harv.) Sur. II. Environmental factors affecting the growing and maturation of gamtophyte. Bull. Tohoku Reg. Fish. Res. Lab. 25: 143–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akiyama K, Kurogi M (1982) Cultivation of Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar, the decrease in crops from natural plants following crop increase from cultivation. Bull. Tohoku Reg. Fish. Res. Lab. 44: 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castric-Fey A, Beaupoil C, Bouchain J, Pradier E, L'Hardy-Halos MTh (1999) The introduced alga Undaria pinnatifida (Laminariales, Alariaceae) in the rocky shore ecosystem of the St Malo area: Growth rate and longevity of the sporophyte. Bot. Mar. 42: 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremades J, Salinas JM, Granja A, Barbara I, Veiga AJ, Perez-Cirera JL, Fuertes C (1997) Influence of the culture factors in the viability and development of Undaria pinnatifida (Laminariales, Phaeophyta): Fouling, seedling-size and adaptation periods before sowing. Nova Acta Cient. Compostelana 7: 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman ARO, Burrows EM (1970) Experimental investigations into the controlling effects of light conditions on the development and growth of Desmarestia aculeata (L.) Lamour. Phycologia 9: 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deysher LE, Dean TA (1986) In situ recruitment of sporophytes of the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera (L.) C.A. Agardh: Effects of physical factors. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 103: 41–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang TC, Jixun D, Dengoin C (1982) Parthenogenesis and the genetic properties of parthenosporophytes of Undaria pinnatifida. Acta Oceanol. Sinica 1: 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks CR (1982) Fundamental concepts in the design of experiments, 3rd ed., Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, NY, p. 425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann AJ, Santelices B (1982) Effects of light intensity and nutrients on gametophytes and gametogenesis of Lessonia nigrescens Bory (Phaeophyta). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 60: 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54: 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim YS, Nam KW (1997) Temperature and light responses on the growth and maturation of gametophytes of Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar in Korea. J. Korean Fish. Soc. 30: 505–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobban CS, Harrison PJ (1994) Seaweed Ecology and Physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüning K (1981) Egg release in gametophytes of Laminaria saccharina: Induction by darkness and inhibition by blue light and U.V. Br. Phycol. J. 16: 379–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüning K, Dring MJ (1975) Reproduction, growth and photosynthesis of gametophytes of Laminaria saccharina grown in blue and red light. Mar. Biol. 29: 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüning K, Neushul M (1978) Light and temperature demands for growth and reproduction of laminarian gametophytes in southern and central California. Mar. Biol. 45: 297–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morita T, Kurashima A, Maegawa M (2003) Temperature requirements for the growth and maturation of the gametophytes of Undaria pinnatifida and U. undarioides (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae). Phycol. Res. 51: 154–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang S, Lüning K (2004) Photoperiodic long-day control of sporophyll and hair formation in the brown alga Undaria pinnatifida. J. Appl. Phycol. 16: 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provasoli L (1968) Media and prospects for the cultivation of marine algae. In Watanabe A, Hottori A (eds), Cultures and Collections of Algae. Proceedings of the US-Japan Conference, Hakone, September 1966. Japanese Society of Plant Physiologists, Tokyo, pp. 63–75.

  • Reed DC (1990) The effects of variable settlement and early competition on patterns of kelp recruitment. Ecology 71: 776–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed DC, Neushul M, Ebeling AW (1991) Role of settlement density on gametophyte growth and reproduction in the kelps Pterygophora californica and Macrocystis pyrifera (Phaeophyceae). J. Phycol. 27: 361–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito Y (1956a) An ecological study of Undaria pinnatifida Sur. I. On the influence of environmental factors upon the development of gametophytes. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 22: 229–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito Y (1956b) An ecological study of Undaria pinnatifida Sur. II. On the influence of environmental factors upon the maturity of gametophytes and early development of sporophytes. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 22: 235–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng CK, Ren KZ, Wu CY (1959) On the discharge of eggs and spermatozoids of Laminaria japonica and the morphology of the spermatozoids. Kexue Tongbao 4: 129–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1981) Techniques of analysis of variance in experimental marine biology and ecology. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 19: 513–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamanaka R, Akiyama K (1993) Cultivation and utilization of Undaria pinnatifida (wakame) as food. J. Appl. Phycol. 5: 249–253.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han Gil Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, H.G., Kim, Y.S., Lee, S.J. et al. Effects of daylength, irradiance and settlement density on the growth and reproduction of Undaria pinnatifida gametophytes. J Appl Phycol 17, 423–430 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-005-0432-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-005-0432-2

Key words

Navigation